Loading…

Stepwise sequential screening for fetal aneuploidy

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate stepwise sequential screening for fetal aneuploidy. Study Design Women who received first-trimester screening were also offered second-trimester tests with second-trimester risks that were based on both sets of markers. Screen-positive rates, use o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007-09, Vol.197 (3), p.312.e1-312.e5
Main Authors: Benn, Peter A., DSc, Campbell, Winston A., MD, Zelop, Carolyn M., MD, Ingardia, Charles, MD, Egan, James F.X., MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate stepwise sequential screening for fetal aneuploidy. Study Design Women who received first-trimester screening were also offered second-trimester tests with second-trimester risks that were based on both sets of markers. Screen-positive rates, use of second-trimester testing and invasive testing, sensitivity, and changes in risks were evaluated. Results Of 1528 women who received first-trimester screening, 133 women (8.7%) had an indication for invasive testing that was based on first-trimester results alone; 1173 women (76.8%) received second-trimester tests, which reduced the net number of women with an indication for invasive testing to 105 (6.9%). In unaffected pregnancies, the addition of the second-trimester testing reduced the median Down syndrome risk from 1:2368 to 1:10,301. Six of 10 chromosome abnormalities (60%) were identified by first-trimester screening, and 9 of 10 chromosome abnormalities (90%) were identified by sequential screening. Conclusion Sequential screening can be introduced successfully into clinical practice, is effective, and can reduce the number of invasive tests that are performed.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.054