Loading…

Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro

Calcium silicate ceramics have been proposed as new bone repair biomaterials, since they have proved to be bioactive, degradable, and biocompatible. β‐tricalcium phosphate ceramic is a well‐known degradable material for bone repair. This study compared the effects of CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2007-01, Vol.80B (1), p.174-183
Main Authors: Ni, Siyu, Chang, Jiang, Chou, Lee, Zhai, Wanyin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473
container_end_page 183
container_issue 1
container_start_page 174
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
container_volume 80B
creator Ni, Siyu
Chang, Jiang
Chou, Lee
Zhai, Wanyin
description Calcium silicate ceramics have been proposed as new bone repair biomaterials, since they have proved to be bioactive, degradable, and biocompatible. β‐tricalcium phosphate ceramic is a well‐known degradable material for bone repair. This study compared the effects of CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐Ca3(PO4)2 (β‐TCP) ceramics on the early stages of rat osteoblast‐like cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Osteoblast‐like cells were cultured directly on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐TCP ceramics. Attachment of a greater number of cells was observed on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics compared with β‐TCP ceramics after incubation for 6 h. SEM observations showed an intimate contact between cells and the substrates, significant cells adhesion, and that the cells spread and grew on the surfaces of all the materials. In addition, the proliferation rate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of the cells on the CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics were improved when compared with the β‐TCP ceramics. In the presence of CaSiO3, elevated levels of calcium and silicon in the culture medium were observed throughout the 7‐day culture period. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that CaSiO3 ceramics showed greater ability to support cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation than β‐TCP ceramic. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.b.30582
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68369195</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68369195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUQC1ERR-wYo-8YoMy2L7j1xJGMAWVwgLE0nIcR3UniYNvBujfN8NMy65d2bLPPZJ9CHnJ2YIzJt5e1_2iXgCTRjwhJ1xKUS2t4U_v9xqOySni9QwrJuEZOeZKK61BnpDNKvejLwnzQHNLM04x153HqerSJtIQu46WiGMeMCKdMg2-C2nbU0xdCn6K1A8NnUq6Ox-vMo5Xu4sQi-9TQJoG-jtNJT8nR63vML44rGfkx8cP31fn1cXX9afVu4sqgFWiAsuEsFYZbRthtTXLpQIeG8lAGFMLDkJFYLWwrWp9YI0x4D1vwCsj5FLDGXm9944l_9pGnFyfcPcSP8S8RacMKMutfBQUFhQ3s_5RkMndz4oZfLMHQ8mIJbZuLKn35cZx5na13FzL1e5frZl-ddBu6z42_9lDnhnge-BP6uLNQy73-f2XO2m1n0lzy7_3M75snNKgpft5uXbn6tslrNbCabgFMqeuUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20560532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ni, Siyu ; Chang, Jiang ; Chou, Lee ; Zhai, Wanyin</creator><creatorcontrib>Ni, Siyu ; Chang, Jiang ; Chou, Lee ; Zhai, Wanyin</creatorcontrib><description>Calcium silicate ceramics have been proposed as new bone repair biomaterials, since they have proved to be bioactive, degradable, and biocompatible. β‐tricalcium phosphate ceramic is a well‐known degradable material for bone repair. This study compared the effects of CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐Ca3(PO4)2 (β‐TCP) ceramics on the early stages of rat osteoblast‐like cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Osteoblast‐like cells were cultured directly on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐TCP ceramics. Attachment of a greater number of cells was observed on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics compared with β‐TCP ceramics after incubation for 6 h. SEM observations showed an intimate contact between cells and the substrates, significant cells adhesion, and that the cells spread and grew on the surfaces of all the materials. In addition, the proliferation rate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of the cells on the CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics were improved when compared with the β‐TCP ceramics. In the presence of CaSiO3, elevated levels of calcium and silicon in the culture medium were observed throughout the 7‐day culture period. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that CaSiO3 ceramics showed greater ability to support cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation than β‐TCP ceramic. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30582</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16767735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis ; Animals ; bioactive material ; Biocompatible Materials ; Bone Substitutes ; calcium phosphate ; Calcium Phosphates ; Cell Adhesion ; Cell Culture Techniques ; Cell Differentiation ; Cell Proliferation ; Cells, Cultured ; ceramic ; Ceramics ; in vitro ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Osteoblasts - enzymology ; Osteoblasts - ultrastructure ; Rats ; Silicates ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2007-01, Vol.80B (1), p.174-183</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16767735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ni, Siyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Wanyin</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>Calcium silicate ceramics have been proposed as new bone repair biomaterials, since they have proved to be bioactive, degradable, and biocompatible. β‐tricalcium phosphate ceramic is a well‐known degradable material for bone repair. This study compared the effects of CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐Ca3(PO4)2 (β‐TCP) ceramics on the early stages of rat osteoblast‐like cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Osteoblast‐like cells were cultured directly on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐TCP ceramics. Attachment of a greater number of cells was observed on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics compared with β‐TCP ceramics after incubation for 6 h. SEM observations showed an intimate contact between cells and the substrates, significant cells adhesion, and that the cells spread and grew on the surfaces of all the materials. In addition, the proliferation rate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of the cells on the CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics were improved when compared with the β‐TCP ceramics. In the presence of CaSiO3, elevated levels of calcium and silicon in the culture medium were observed throughout the 7‐day culture period. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that CaSiO3 ceramics showed greater ability to support cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation than β‐TCP ceramic. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007</description><subject>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bioactive material</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes</subject><subject>calcium phosphate</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Cell Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Cell Proliferation</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>ceramic</subject><subject>Ceramics</subject><subject>in vitro</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - enzymology</subject><subject>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUQC1ERR-wYo-8YoMy2L7j1xJGMAWVwgLE0nIcR3UniYNvBujfN8NMy65d2bLPPZJ9CHnJ2YIzJt5e1_2iXgCTRjwhJ1xKUS2t4U_v9xqOySni9QwrJuEZOeZKK61BnpDNKvejLwnzQHNLM04x153HqerSJtIQu46WiGMeMCKdMg2-C2nbU0xdCn6K1A8NnUq6Ox-vMo5Xu4sQi-9TQJoG-jtNJT8nR63vML44rGfkx8cP31fn1cXX9afVu4sqgFWiAsuEsFYZbRthtTXLpQIeG8lAGFMLDkJFYLWwrWp9YI0x4D1vwCsj5FLDGXm9944l_9pGnFyfcPcSP8S8RacMKMutfBQUFhQ3s_5RkMndz4oZfLMHQ8mIJbZuLKn35cZx5na13FzL1e5frZl-ddBu6z42_9lDnhnge-BP6uLNQy73-f2XO2m1n0lzy7_3M75snNKgpft5uXbn6tslrNbCabgFMqeuUg</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Ni, Siyu</creator><creator>Chang, Jiang</creator><creator>Chou, Lee</creator><creator>Zhai, Wanyin</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro</title><author>Ni, Siyu ; Chang, Jiang ; Chou, Lee ; Zhai, Wanyin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bioactive material</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes</topic><topic>calcium phosphate</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Cell Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Cell Proliferation</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>ceramic</topic><topic>Ceramics</topic><topic>in vitro</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - enzymology</topic><topic>Osteoblasts - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ni, Siyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chou, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhai, Wanyin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ni, Siyu</au><au>Chang, Jiang</au><au>Chou, Lee</au><au>Zhai, Wanyin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>80B</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>174</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>174-183</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><abstract>Calcium silicate ceramics have been proposed as new bone repair biomaterials, since they have proved to be bioactive, degradable, and biocompatible. β‐tricalcium phosphate ceramic is a well‐known degradable material for bone repair. This study compared the effects of CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐Ca3(PO4)2 (β‐TCP) ceramics on the early stages of rat osteoblast‐like cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Osteoblast‐like cells were cultured directly on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) and β‐TCP ceramics. Attachment of a greater number of cells was observed on CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics compared with β‐TCP ceramics after incubation for 6 h. SEM observations showed an intimate contact between cells and the substrates, significant cells adhesion, and that the cells spread and grew on the surfaces of all the materials. In addition, the proliferation rate and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity of the cells on the CaSiO3 (α‐, and β‐CaSiO3) ceramics were improved when compared with the β‐TCP ceramics. In the presence of CaSiO3, elevated levels of calcium and silicon in the culture medium were observed throughout the 7‐day culture period. In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that CaSiO3 ceramics showed greater ability to support cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation than β‐TCP ceramic. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2007</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16767735</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.30582</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1552-4973
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 2007-01, Vol.80B (1), p.174-183
issn 1552-4973
1552-4981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68369195
source Wiley
subjects Alkaline Phosphatase - analysis
Animals
bioactive material
Biocompatible Materials
Bone Substitutes
calcium phosphate
Calcium Phosphates
Cell Adhesion
Cell Culture Techniques
Cell Differentiation
Cell Proliferation
Cells, Cultured
ceramic
Ceramics
in vitro
Materials Testing
Microscopy, Electron, Scanning
Osteoblasts - enzymology
Osteoblasts - ultrastructure
Rats
Silicates
Time Factors
title Comparison of osteoblast-like cell responses to calcium silicate and tricalcium phosphate ceramics in vitro
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A38%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20osteoblast-like%20cell%20responses%20to%20calcium%20silicate%20and%20tricalcium%20phosphate%20ceramics%20in%20vitro&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20B,%20Applied%20biomaterials&rft.au=Ni,%20Siyu&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=80B&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=174&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=174-183&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.30582&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68369195%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3962-39022996879d2979844631ed503288b21326e30b29f6fac0d883aa1d3a6825473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20560532&rft_id=info:pmid/16767735&rfr_iscdi=true