Loading…

Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany

Implementation of outpatient treatment (OT) of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is slow despite clear evidence that it is effective, safe and cost-efficient. An initiative was launched with the help of the Professional Association of Phlebologists of Germany and the industry to familiarize physicians in p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2005-09, Vol.30 (3), p.319-324
Main Authors: Blättler, W., Gerlach, H.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353
container_end_page 324
container_issue 3
container_start_page 319
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 30
creator Blättler, W.
Gerlach, H.E.
description Implementation of outpatient treatment (OT) of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is slow despite clear evidence that it is effective, safe and cost-efficient. An initiative was launched with the help of the Professional Association of Phlebologists of Germany and the industry to familiarize physicians in private practice who had no prior experience with OT of DVT. Data on quality of treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin and phenprocoumon, compliance, clinical outcome, venous ultrasound, patients' satisfaction and quality of life were collected in a registry, which was open from July 1999 to December 2000. The results were published and their impact on further management of patients was assessed in second survey reported here. Patients of both series were followed-up clinically and with ultrasound over the 1st month of treatment. Of 67 physicians entering 827 patients into the registry 26 answered a questionnaire on how they treated further patients. Their case load had increased by 450% and data were provided on 540 consecutive patients managed between January and June 2002. OT increased overall from 76 to 92%, that of popliteo-femoral DVT from 71 to 92%, and that of pelvic DVT from 38 to 65%. Medical reasons to decide against OT decreased from 89 to 56% (p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68435899</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588405002650</els_id><sourcerecordid>68435899</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZk7etyWaTJuBFqtZCoR7q1ZDNzmJK949JutBvb9YWvAkDk3n5zSN5CN0SPCWY8IftFLa9n2YYs-lQmJyhMWE0SzPC2Xk845lImRD5CF15v8URJJRdohFhMpeSiTH6XNbdDmpogg62bZK2Stb70MUhSsnGgQ7D5aA_A3RpD7ZJNl-urYvWW5_E6d3ZXgeIXZtgDfyKC3C1bg7X6KLSOw83pz5BH68vm_lbulovlvOnVWqoFCEFmc-kKCpKBeAi1xSTvBCcl1VlcsGL-HCjISOQGRIBmZWGF7kpuZxxyimjE3R_9O1c-70HH1RtvYHdTjfQ7r3iIqdMSBnB7Aga13rvoFKds7V2B0WwGlJVWzWkqoZU1VCYxKW7k_u-qKH8WznFGIHHIwDxj70Fp7yJARoorQMTVNna__x_AJrTidk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68435899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Blättler, W. ; Gerlach, H.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Blättler, W. ; Gerlach, H.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation of outpatient treatment (OT) of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is slow despite clear evidence that it is effective, safe and cost-efficient. An initiative was launched with the help of the Professional Association of Phlebologists of Germany and the industry to familiarize physicians in private practice who had no prior experience with OT of DVT. Data on quality of treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin and phenprocoumon, compliance, clinical outcome, venous ultrasound, patients' satisfaction and quality of life were collected in a registry, which was open from July 1999 to December 2000. The results were published and their impact on further management of patients was assessed in second survey reported here. Patients of both series were followed-up clinically and with ultrasound over the 1st month of treatment. Of 67 physicians entering 827 patients into the registry 26 answered a questionnaire on how they treated further patients. Their case load had increased by 450% and data were provided on 540 consecutive patients managed between January and June 2002. OT increased overall from 76 to 92%, that of popliteo-femoral DVT from 71 to 92%, and that of pelvic DVT from 38 to 65%. Medical reasons to decide against OT decreased from 89 to 56% (p&lt;.01). Immediate leg compression was changed from bandaging to medical compression stockings in 20 of the 26 centres (p&lt;.05). In total, data were gathered from OT of 1124 patients. No secondary hospitalisations were required and only one patient had a documented progression of the DVT. OT was successfully implemented in private practices through the initiative of individual physicians with support of the professional association and sponsoring by the industry—to the benefit of the providers but as much of the patients and their cost bearers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15949958</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Ambulatory Care ; Anticoagulants - therapeutic use ; Bandages ; Deep-vein thrombosis ; Early Ambulation ; Germany ; Humans ; Implementation ; Outpatient treatment ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Private Practice ; Sponsoring ; Treatment Outcome ; Venous Thrombosis - economics ; Venous Thrombosis - therapy</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2005-09, Vol.30 (3), p.319-324</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15949958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blättler, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, H.E.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>Implementation of outpatient treatment (OT) of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is slow despite clear evidence that it is effective, safe and cost-efficient. An initiative was launched with the help of the Professional Association of Phlebologists of Germany and the industry to familiarize physicians in private practice who had no prior experience with OT of DVT. Data on quality of treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin and phenprocoumon, compliance, clinical outcome, venous ultrasound, patients' satisfaction and quality of life were collected in a registry, which was open from July 1999 to December 2000. The results were published and their impact on further management of patients was assessed in second survey reported here. Patients of both series were followed-up clinically and with ultrasound over the 1st month of treatment. Of 67 physicians entering 827 patients into the registry 26 answered a questionnaire on how they treated further patients. Their case load had increased by 450% and data were provided on 540 consecutive patients managed between January and June 2002. OT increased overall from 76 to 92%, that of popliteo-femoral DVT from 71 to 92%, and that of pelvic DVT from 38 to 65%. Medical reasons to decide against OT decreased from 89 to 56% (p&lt;.01). Immediate leg compression was changed from bandaging to medical compression stockings in 20 of the 26 centres (p&lt;.05). In total, data were gathered from OT of 1124 patients. No secondary hospitalisations were required and only one patient had a documented progression of the DVT. OT was successfully implemented in private practices through the initiative of individual physicians with support of the professional association and sponsoring by the industry—to the benefit of the providers but as much of the patients and their cost bearers.</description><subject>Ambulatory Care</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>Deep-vein thrombosis</subject><subject>Early Ambulation</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Outpatient treatment</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Private Practice</subject><subject>Sponsoring</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - economics</subject><subject>Venous Thrombosis - therapy</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMotla_gAfZk7etyWaTJuBFqtZCoR7q1ZDNzmJK949JutBvb9YWvAkDk3n5zSN5CN0SPCWY8IftFLa9n2YYs-lQmJyhMWE0SzPC2Xk845lImRD5CF15v8URJJRdohFhMpeSiTH6XNbdDmpogg62bZK2Stb70MUhSsnGgQ7D5aA_A3RpD7ZJNl-urYvWW5_E6d3ZXgeIXZtgDfyKC3C1bg7X6KLSOw83pz5BH68vm_lbulovlvOnVWqoFCEFmc-kKCpKBeAi1xSTvBCcl1VlcsGL-HCjISOQGRIBmZWGF7kpuZxxyimjE3R_9O1c-70HH1RtvYHdTjfQ7r3iIqdMSBnB7Aga13rvoFKds7V2B0WwGlJVWzWkqoZU1VCYxKW7k_u-qKH8WznFGIHHIwDxj70Fp7yJARoorQMTVNna__x_AJrTidk</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Blättler, W.</creator><creator>Gerlach, H.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany</title><author>Blättler, W. ; Gerlach, H.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ambulatory Care</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>Deep-vein thrombosis</topic><topic>Early Ambulation</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Outpatient treatment</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Private Practice</topic><topic>Sponsoring</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - economics</topic><topic>Venous Thrombosis - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blättler, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerlach, H.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blättler, W.</au><au>Gerlach, H.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>319</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>319-324</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>Implementation of outpatient treatment (OT) of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) is slow despite clear evidence that it is effective, safe and cost-efficient. An initiative was launched with the help of the Professional Association of Phlebologists of Germany and the industry to familiarize physicians in private practice who had no prior experience with OT of DVT. Data on quality of treatment with the low-molecular-weight heparin tinzaparin and phenprocoumon, compliance, clinical outcome, venous ultrasound, patients' satisfaction and quality of life were collected in a registry, which was open from July 1999 to December 2000. The results were published and their impact on further management of patients was assessed in second survey reported here. Patients of both series were followed-up clinically and with ultrasound over the 1st month of treatment. Of 67 physicians entering 827 patients into the registry 26 answered a questionnaire on how they treated further patients. Their case load had increased by 450% and data were provided on 540 consecutive patients managed between January and June 2002. OT increased overall from 76 to 92%, that of popliteo-femoral DVT from 71 to 92%, and that of pelvic DVT from 38 to 65%. Medical reasons to decide against OT decreased from 89 to 56% (p&lt;.01). Immediate leg compression was changed from bandaging to medical compression stockings in 20 of the 26 centres (p&lt;.05). In total, data were gathered from OT of 1124 patients. No secondary hospitalisations were required and only one patient had a documented progression of the DVT. OT was successfully implemented in private practices through the initiative of individual physicians with support of the professional association and sponsoring by the industry—to the benefit of the providers but as much of the patients and their cost bearers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15949958</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 2005-09, Vol.30 (3), p.319-324
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68435899
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Ambulatory Care
Anticoagulants - therapeutic use
Bandages
Deep-vein thrombosis
Early Ambulation
Germany
Humans
Implementation
Outpatient treatment
Practice Patterns, Physicians
Private Practice
Sponsoring
Treatment Outcome
Venous Thrombosis - economics
Venous Thrombosis - therapy
title Implementation of Outpatient Treatment of Deep-vein Thrombosis in Private Practices in Germany
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A02%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20Outpatient%20Treatment%20of%20Deep-vein%20Thrombosis%20in%20Private%20Practices%20in%20Germany&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Bl%C3%A4ttler,%20W.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=319&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=319-324&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.05.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68435899%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-e94798bf338e0b4a3014b866dffc486b005cae21e2c1e0b92dc6b4cd697636353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68435899&rft_id=info:pmid/15949958&rfr_iscdi=true