Loading…

Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects

In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of applied psychology 2005-07, Vol.90 (4), p.677-691
Main Authors: Keith, Nina, Frese, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603
container_end_page 691
container_issue 4
container_start_page 677
container_title Journal of applied psychology
container_volume 90
creator Keith, Nina
Frese, Michael
description In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory processes mediating this effect. Fifty-five volunteer students learned a computer program under 1 of 3 conditions: error avoidant training, error management training, or error management training supplemented with a metacognitive module. As predicted, both forms of error management training led to better transfer performance than did error avoidant training ( d = 0.75). Mediation hypotheses were fully supported: Emotion control and metacognitive activity (from verbal protocols) mediated performance differences. These findings highlight the potential of promoting self-regulatory processing during training.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68437979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ936608</ericid><sourcerecordid>903405201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2PEzEMhiMEYsvCH0AIVQg4McVO0nwc0arLhxYhQe-RJ81UWU0zQzJz2H_PzLbaShzgYsvy41e2X8ZeIqwQhP4IwLGyMJUWVnKltH7EFmiFrdCs5WO2eAAu2LNSbgFQCgtP2QUqUKCNWrAPv0LbVD_DfmxpiF1axrTc5Nzl5XdKtA-HkIblNlNMMe2fsycNtSW8OOVLtr3ebK--VDc_Pn-9-nRT0RphqKznQlvwBFyFpiGj1gI91IQo9G7XcE11IKOl0QJsDb6WvgZTm-C5VyAu2fujbJ-732MogzvE4kPbUgrdWJwyctLX9r_gWiOg5WYC3_wF3nZjTtMNTqGUKCTn_4I4Cis53kP8CPnclZJD4_ocD5TvHIKbXXHz09389Ck46SZXpqHXJ-WxPoTdeeRkwwS8OwFUPLVNpuRjOXMaQAKfhV4duZCjf2hvvlmhFMxnvj22qSfXlztPeYi-DcVR357X-QOLyaba</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614413422</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Keith, Nina ; Frese, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina ; Frese, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory processes mediating this effect. Fifty-five volunteer students learned a computer program under 1 of 3 conditions: error avoidant training, error management training, or error management training supplemented with a metacognitive module. As predicted, both forms of error management training led to better transfer performance than did error avoidant training ( d = 0.75). Mediation hypotheses were fully supported: Emotion control and metacognitive activity (from verbal protocols) mediated performance differences. These findings highlight the potential of promoting self-regulatory processing during training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16060786</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPGBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adaptation, Psychological ; Adult ; Affect ; Applied psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Computer Software ; Employee development ; Error analysis ; Error Correction ; Errors ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Learning ; Male ; Management Development ; Management Training ; Metacognition ; Miscellaneous ; Organizational learning ; Performance measurement ; Prediction ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Self Control ; Self-Regulation ; Selfregulation ; Social Control, Informal ; Studies ; Teaching - methods ; Training ; Transfer of Training</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied psychology, 2005-07, Vol.90 (4), p.677-691</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jul 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ936608$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17004027$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16060786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frese, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects</title><title>Journal of applied psychology</title><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><description>In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory processes mediating this effect. Fifty-five volunteer students learned a computer program under 1 of 3 conditions: error avoidant training, error management training, or error management training supplemented with a metacognitive module. As predicted, both forms of error management training led to better transfer performance than did error avoidant training ( d = 0.75). Mediation hypotheses were fully supported: Emotion control and metacognitive activity (from verbal protocols) mediated performance differences. These findings highlight the potential of promoting self-regulatory processing during training.</description><subject>Adaptation, Psychological</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Applied psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Employee development</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Error Correction</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management Development</subject><subject>Management Training</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Organizational learning</subject><subject>Performance measurement</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Self Control</subject><subject>Self-Regulation</subject><subject>Selfregulation</subject><subject>Social Control, Informal</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teaching - methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Transfer of Training</subject><issn>0021-9010</issn><issn>1939-1854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2PEzEMhiMEYsvCH0AIVQg4McVO0nwc0arLhxYhQe-RJ81UWU0zQzJz2H_PzLbaShzgYsvy41e2X8ZeIqwQhP4IwLGyMJUWVnKltH7EFmiFrdCs5WO2eAAu2LNSbgFQCgtP2QUqUKCNWrAPv0LbVD_DfmxpiF1axrTc5Nzl5XdKtA-HkIblNlNMMe2fsycNtSW8OOVLtr3ebK--VDc_Pn-9-nRT0RphqKznQlvwBFyFpiGj1gI91IQo9G7XcE11IKOl0QJsDb6WvgZTm-C5VyAu2fujbJ-732MogzvE4kPbUgrdWJwyctLX9r_gWiOg5WYC3_wF3nZjTtMNTqGUKCTn_4I4Cis53kP8CPnclZJD4_ocD5TvHIKbXXHz09389Ck46SZXpqHXJ-WxPoTdeeRkwwS8OwFUPLVNpuRjOXMaQAKfhV4duZCjf2hvvlmhFMxnvj22qSfXlztPeYi-DcVR357X-QOLyaba</recordid><startdate>20050701</startdate><enddate>20050701</enddate><creator>Keith, Nina</creator><creator>Frese, Michael</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050701</creationdate><title>Self-Regulation in Error Management Training</title><author>Keith, Nina ; Frese, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adaptation, Psychological</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Applied psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Employee development</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Error Correction</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management Development</topic><topic>Management Training</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Organizational learning</topic><topic>Performance measurement</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Self Control</topic><topic>Self-Regulation</topic><topic>Selfregulation</topic><topic>Social Control, Informal</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teaching - methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Transfer of Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Keith, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frese, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Keith, Nina</au><au>Frese, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ936608</ericid><atitle>Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Psychol</addtitle><date>2005-07-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>677</spage><epage>691</epage><pages>677-691</pages><issn>0021-9010</issn><eissn>1939-1854</eissn><coden>JAPGBP</coden><abstract>In error management training, participants are explicitly encouraged to make errors and learn from them. Error management training has frequently been shown to lead to better performance than conventional trainings that adopt an error avoidant approach. The present study investigated self-regulatory processes mediating this effect. Fifty-five volunteer students learned a computer program under 1 of 3 conditions: error avoidant training, error management training, or error management training supplemented with a metacognitive module. As predicted, both forms of error management training led to better transfer performance than did error avoidant training ( d = 0.75). Mediation hypotheses were fully supported: Emotion control and metacognitive activity (from verbal protocols) mediated performance differences. These findings highlight the potential of promoting self-regulatory processing during training.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>16060786</pmid><doi>10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9010
ispartof Journal of applied psychology, 2005-07, Vol.90 (4), p.677-691
issn 0021-9010
1939-1854
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68437979
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; PsycARTICLES; ERIC
subjects Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Affect
Applied psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Computer Software
Employee development
Error analysis
Error Correction
Errors
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Learning
Male
Management Development
Management Training
Metacognition
Miscellaneous
Organizational learning
Performance measurement
Prediction
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Self Control
Self-Regulation
Selfregulation
Social Control, Informal
Studies
Teaching - methods
Training
Transfer of Training
title Self-Regulation in Error Management Training: Emotion Control and Metacognition as Mediators of Performance Effects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A59%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-Regulation%20in%20Error%20Management%20Training:%20Emotion%20Control%20and%20Metacognition%20as%20Mediators%20of%20Performance%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20psychology&rft.au=Keith,%20Nina&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=677&rft.epage=691&rft.pages=677-691&rft.issn=0021-9010&rft.eissn=1939-1854&rft.coden=JAPGBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.677&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903405201%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a510t-9c23790ca026effa86531c0ba1137ddf27abea87487309b0cb4cb08b8ec2c603%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614413422&rft_id=info:pmid/16060786&rft_ericid=EJ936608&rfr_iscdi=true