Loading…
Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)
The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7...
Saved in:
Published in: | Calcified tissue international 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173 |
container_end_page | 425 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | Calcified tissue international |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Messent, E A Buckland-Wright, J C Blake, G M |
description | The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68438006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17118653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EIsvCA3BBFgeUHAba45_xHpNAACkoF5C4WT3eHmWS-QluD9K-Aw-Nl10JiQuntspfl60qIV4qeKsAmncMUNe6AjAVKAdV80islNF1Bb5uHosVqEZVG9d8PxHPmO8AlHHOPRUnynptLOiV-HWVMGYcJE447LhnOXcyJ2wpLgMm2c4TyX6S9xORnDnTjCnfpj4X8vTm_EyWiXKcE0mmiYv-k-SI6Z7S3mnbMyGXu4x5YZlvcTpYjv1EqTy7_bO0k6cXX96fPRdPOhyYXhznWny7-vD18lN1ffPx8-X5dRW1bXKlvHbRxtp6j4BdJNvaongfy2HjOjBF1OgsIUWDjfbonImwabUhUo1eizcH34c0_1iIcxh7jjQMONG8cHDeaA_g_guWfJV3Vhfw9T_g3bykEimHWmmorSvUWqgDFNPMnKgLD6kvWe2CgrAvNBwKDaXQsC807L_66mi8tCNt_24cG9S_AcUQm-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213025665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</creator><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-967X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15834503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density - physiology ; Female ; Fractals ; Humans ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - pathology</subject><ispartof>Calcified tissue international, 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15834503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckland-Wright, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><title>Calcified tissue international</title><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - pathology</subject><issn>0171-967X</issn><issn>1432-0827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EIsvCA3BBFgeUHAba45_xHpNAACkoF5C4WT3eHmWS-QluD9K-Aw-Nl10JiQuntspfl60qIV4qeKsAmncMUNe6AjAVKAdV80islNF1Bb5uHosVqEZVG9d8PxHPmO8AlHHOPRUnynptLOiV-HWVMGYcJE447LhnOXcyJ2wpLgMm2c4TyX6S9xORnDnTjCnfpj4X8vTm_EyWiXKcE0mmiYv-k-SI6Z7S3mnbMyGXu4x5YZlvcTpYjv1EqTy7_bO0k6cXX96fPRdPOhyYXhznWny7-vD18lN1ffPx8-X5dRW1bXKlvHbRxtp6j4BdJNvaongfy2HjOjBF1OgsIUWDjfbonImwabUhUo1eizcH34c0_1iIcxh7jjQMONG8cHDeaA_g_guWfJV3Vhfw9T_g3bykEimHWmmorSvUWqgDFNPMnKgLD6kvWe2CgrAvNBwKDaXQsC807L_66mi8tCNt_24cG9S_AcUQm-o</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Messent, E A</creator><creator>Buckland-Wright, J C</creator><creator>Blake, G M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><author>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckland-Wright, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Messent, E A</au><au>Buckland-Wright, J C</au><au>Blake, G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</atitle><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>419-425</pages><issn>0171-967X</issn><eissn>1432-0827</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15834503</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0171-967X |
ispartof | Calcified tissue international, 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425 |
issn | 0171-967X 1432-0827 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68438006 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Absorptiometry, Photon Aged Aged, 80 and over Bone Density - physiology Female Fractals Humans Male Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis Sensitivity and Specificity Tibia - diagnostic imaging Tibia - pathology |
title | Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fractal%20analysis%20of%20trabecular%20bone%20in%20knee%20osteoarthritis%20(OA)%20is%20a%20more%20sensitive%20marker%20of%20disease%20status%20than%20bone%20mineral%20density%20(BMD)&rft.jtitle=Calcified%20tissue%20international&rft.au=Messent,%20E%20A&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=419-425&rft.issn=0171-967X&rft.eissn=1432-0827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17118653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213025665&rft_id=info:pmid/15834503&rfr_iscdi=true |