Loading…

Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)

The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Calcified tissue international 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425
Main Authors: Messent, E A, Buckland-Wright, J C, Blake, G M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173
container_end_page 425
container_issue 6
container_start_page 419
container_title Calcified tissue international
container_volume 76
creator Messent, E A
Buckland-Wright, J C
Blake, G M
description The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P < 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P < 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68438006</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17118653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EIsvCA3BBFgeUHAba45_xHpNAACkoF5C4WT3eHmWS-QluD9K-Aw-Nl10JiQuntspfl60qIV4qeKsAmncMUNe6AjAVKAdV80islNF1Bb5uHosVqEZVG9d8PxHPmO8AlHHOPRUnynptLOiV-HWVMGYcJE447LhnOXcyJ2wpLgMm2c4TyX6S9xORnDnTjCnfpj4X8vTm_EyWiXKcE0mmiYv-k-SI6Z7S3mnbMyGXu4x5YZlvcTpYjv1EqTy7_bO0k6cXX96fPRdPOhyYXhznWny7-vD18lN1ffPx8-X5dRW1bXKlvHbRxtp6j4BdJNvaongfy2HjOjBF1OgsIUWDjfbonImwabUhUo1eizcH34c0_1iIcxh7jjQMONG8cHDeaA_g_guWfJV3Vhfw9T_g3bykEimHWmmorSvUWqgDFNPMnKgLD6kvWe2CgrAvNBwKDaXQsC807L_66mi8tCNt_24cG9S_AcUQm-o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>213025665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</creator><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0171-967X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0827</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15834503</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Bone Density - physiology ; Female ; Fractals ; Humans ; Male ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tibia - diagnostic imaging ; Tibia - pathology</subject><ispartof>Calcified tissue international, 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15834503$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckland-Wright, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><title>Calcified tissue international</title><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Bone Density - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tibia - pathology</subject><issn>0171-967X</issn><issn>1432-0827</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1uFDEQhC0EIsvCA3BBFgeUHAba45_xHpNAACkoF5C4WT3eHmWS-QluD9K-Aw-Nl10JiQuntspfl60qIV4qeKsAmncMUNe6AjAVKAdV80islNF1Bb5uHosVqEZVG9d8PxHPmO8AlHHOPRUnynptLOiV-HWVMGYcJE447LhnOXcyJ2wpLgMm2c4TyX6S9xORnDnTjCnfpj4X8vTm_EyWiXKcE0mmiYv-k-SI6Z7S3mnbMyGXu4x5YZlvcTpYjv1EqTy7_bO0k6cXX96fPRdPOhyYXhznWny7-vD18lN1ffPx8-X5dRW1bXKlvHbRxtp6j4BdJNvaongfy2HjOjBF1OgsIUWDjfbonImwabUhUo1eizcH34c0_1iIcxh7jjQMONG8cHDeaA_g_guWfJV3Vhfw9T_g3bykEimHWmmorSvUWqgDFNPMnKgLD6kvWe2CgrAvNBwKDaXQsC807L_66mi8tCNt_24cG9S_AcUQm-o</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Messent, E A</creator><creator>Buckland-Wright, J C</creator><creator>Blake, G M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</title><author>Messent, E A ; Buckland-Wright, J C ; Blake, G M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Bone Density - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tibia - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tibia - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Messent, E A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckland-Wright, J C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blake, G M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Messent, E A</au><au>Buckland-Wright, J C</au><au>Blake, G M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)</atitle><jtitle>Calcified tissue international</jtitle><addtitle>Calcif Tissue Int</addtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>419</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>419-425</pages><issn>0171-967X</issn><eissn>1432-0827</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to determine whether fractal analysis (FSA) of macroradiographs or bone mineral density (BMD) is more sensitive in detecting disease-related cancellous bone alterations in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Differences in BMD between 11 OA (6 females) and 11 non-OA reference (7 females) tibiae were compared with differences in trabecular organization measured by computerized method of fractal signature analysis (FSA) of digitized macroradiographs (x3.5 to x5). OA knees had anatomic and radiographic evidence of medial compartment disease. FSA measured cancellous bone organization at 4 regions of interest (ROI): medial and lateral subchondral (Sc) and subarticular (Sa) sites, dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measured BMD at the same ROIs. Compared to non-OA, OA tibiae had significant increased (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region (trabecular size range: 0.42-0.54; 0.90-1.98 mm) and significant decrease (P &lt; 0.05) in FSA for some horizontal trabeculae in the Sc region (trabecular size range: medial side 0.12-0.18 mm; lateral side 0.12-0.24 mm). Compared to non-OA, BMD of OA tibiae was not significantly different at any ROI. BMD was not sensitive to changes in trabecular organization detected by FSA. The increase in FSA of vertical trabeculae in the medial Sa region was consistent with trabecular fenestration and thinning, which may have been detected as decreased BMD in a larger sample. For studies involving small sample sizes, quantifying changes in trabecular organization is more sensitive than BMD for detecting bone alterations in knee OA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15834503</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0171-967X
ispartof Calcified tissue international, 2005-06, Vol.76 (6), p.419-425
issn 0171-967X
1432-0827
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68438006
source Springer Link
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Density - physiology
Female
Fractals
Humans
Male
Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnosis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tibia - diagnostic imaging
Tibia - pathology
title Fractal analysis of trabecular bone in knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a more sensitive marker of disease status than bone mineral density (BMD)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fractal%20analysis%20of%20trabecular%20bone%20in%20knee%20osteoarthritis%20(OA)%20is%20a%20more%20sensitive%20marker%20of%20disease%20status%20than%20bone%20mineral%20density%20(BMD)&rft.jtitle=Calcified%20tissue%20international&rft.au=Messent,%20E%20A&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=419&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=419-425&rft.issn=0171-967X&rft.eissn=1432-0827&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00223-004-0160-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17118653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-1836c5c2588a0afce5b536c88c5b596f04afc3a65eaec4a738a664c09b34ee173%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=213025665&rft_id=info:pmid/15834503&rfr_iscdi=true