Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment

According to (2), the CoM position can be found by first filtering the CoP position with a first-order lowpass filter with cut-off frequency (about 0.5Hz), and then filtering again by the same filter with reversed time (e.g. with the Matlab 'filtfilt' function). [...]both signals are subtr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biomechanics 2005-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2134-2135
Main Author: Hof, At L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Body Weight
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Methods
Postural Balance - physiology
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3
container_end_page 2135
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2134
container_title Journal of biomechanics
container_volume 38
creator Hof, At L.
description According to (2), the CoM position can be found by first filtering the CoP position with a first-order lowpass filter with cut-off frequency (about 0.5Hz), and then filtering again by the same filter with reversed time (e.g. with the Matlab 'filtfilt' function). [...]both signals are subtracted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.029
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68457276</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021929005001727</els_id><sourcerecordid>2743967381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN-L1DAQx4Mo3t7pv3AEBN9aJ7_bN2VRTzjw5XwObTp1U7bNmrSC_72z7Irgi08hmc_MfPNh7F5ALUDYd1M99THNGA61BDA1qBpk-4ztRONUJVUDz9kOQIqqlS3csNtSJgBw2rUv2Y0wrZLOuB172qf51OVY0sLTyNdDRuQzroc0FL4mjmWNc7ciVZAHXFbMZ27uSuHDluPynffdsVsCcnrCUmZiXrEXY3cs-Pp63rFvnz4-7R-qx6-fv-w_PFZBW1irYXTWODMAjKCExa5vGi3cCFJDa6VxGJQKQloVKGsYetOjdS3dtNG6GdUde3uZe8rpx0ZR_RxLwCPlwbQVbxttnHSWwDf_gFPa8kLZvAClW0EbJVH2QoWcSsk4-lOmz-dfBPmzdT_5P9b92boH5ck6Nd5fx2_9jMPftqtmAt5fACQbPyNmX0JEkjbEjGH1Q4r_2_Eb7aCVkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1034912402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hof, At L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hof, At L.</creatorcontrib><description>According to (2), the CoM position can be found by first filtering the CoP position with a first-order lowpass filter with cut-off frequency (about 0.5Hz), and then filtering again by the same filter with reversed time (e.g. with the Matlab 'filtfilt' function). [...]both signals are subtracted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15932757</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Body Weight ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Humans ; Methods ; Postural Balance - physiology ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanics, 2005-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2134-2135</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15932757$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hof, At L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment</title><title>Journal of biomechanics</title><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><description>According to (2), the CoM position can be found by first filtering the CoP position with a first-order lowpass filter with cut-off frequency (about 0.5Hz), and then filtering again by the same filter with reversed time (e.g. with the Matlab 'filtfilt' function). [...]both signals are subtracted.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Postural Balance - physiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0021-9290</issn><issn>1873-2380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkN-L1DAQx4Mo3t7pv3AEBN9aJ7_bN2VRTzjw5XwObTp1U7bNmrSC_72z7Irgi08hmc_MfPNh7F5ALUDYd1M99THNGA61BDA1qBpk-4ztRONUJVUDz9kOQIqqlS3csNtSJgBw2rUv2Y0wrZLOuB172qf51OVY0sLTyNdDRuQzroc0FL4mjmWNc7ciVZAHXFbMZ27uSuHDluPynffdsVsCcnrCUmZiXrEXY3cs-Pp63rFvnz4-7R-qx6-fv-w_PFZBW1irYXTWODMAjKCExa5vGi3cCFJDa6VxGJQKQloVKGsYetOjdS3dtNG6GdUde3uZe8rpx0ZR_RxLwCPlwbQVbxttnHSWwDf_gFPa8kLZvAClW0EbJVH2QoWcSsk4-lOmz-dfBPmzdT_5P9b92boH5ck6Nd5fx2_9jMPftqtmAt5fACQbPyNmX0JEkjbEjGH1Q4r_2_Eb7aCVkA</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Hof, At L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment</title><author>Hof, At L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Postural Balance - physiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hof, At L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hof, At L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomech</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2134</spage><epage>2135</epage><pages>2134-2135</pages><issn>0021-9290</issn><eissn>1873-2380</eissn><abstract>According to (2), the CoM position can be found by first filtering the CoP position with a first-order lowpass filter with cut-off frequency (about 0.5Hz), and then filtering again by the same filter with reversed time (e.g. with the Matlab 'filtfilt' function). [...]both signals are subtracted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>15932757</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.029</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9290
ispartof Journal of biomechanics, 2005-10, Vol.38 (10), p.2134-2135
issn 0021-9290
1873-2380
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68457276
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Algorithms
Body Weight
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Humans
Methods
Postural Balance - physiology
Studies
title Comparison of three methods to estimate the center of mass during balance assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T07%3A56%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20methods%20to%20estimate%20the%20center%20of%20mass%20during%20balance%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanics&rft.au=Hof,%20At%20L.&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2134&rft.epage=2135&rft.pages=2134-2135&rft.issn=0021-9290&rft.eissn=1873-2380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.03.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2743967381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-df76575d00f0316eab88417f024096257ec33c1263c757cdb5be6793c745448f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1034912402&rft_id=info:pmid/15932757&rfr_iscdi=true