Loading…

Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA

In the United States, housing density has substantially increased in and adjacent to forests. Our goal in this study was to identify how housing density and human populations are associated with avian diversity. We compared these associations to those between landscape pattern and avian diversity, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological applications 2007-10, Vol.17 (7), p.1989-2010
Main Authors: Pidgeon, A.M, Radeloff, V.C, Flather, C.H, Lepczyk, C.A, Clayton, M.K, Hawbaker, T.J, Hammer, R.B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073
container_end_page 2010
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1989
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 17
creator Pidgeon, A.M
Radeloff, V.C
Flather, C.H
Lepczyk, C.A
Clayton, M.K
Hawbaker, T.J
Hammer, R.B
description In the United States, housing density has substantially increased in and adjacent to forests. Our goal in this study was to identify how housing density and human populations are associated with avian diversity. We compared these associations to those between landscape pattern and avian diversity, and we examined how these associations vary across the conterminous forested United States. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, the U.S. Census, and the National Land Cover Database, we focused on forest and woodland bird communities and conducted our analysis at multiple levels of model specificity, first using a coarse-thematic resolution (basic models), then using a larger number of fine-thematic resolution variables (refined models). We found that housing development was associated with forest bird species richness in all forested ecoregions of the conterminous United States. However, there were important differences among ecoregions. In the basic models, housing density accounted for
doi_str_mv 10.1890/06-1489.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68459328</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40062093</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40062093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtrHDEQhEVIiB3bB_-AJDoFchinW4_R6LgYPwKGGOw9C41G8srsribSLMb_3nJmcU4hOkiC-qqobkJOEc6w0_AD2gZFp8_wHTlEzXUjZcfe1z9IbEC1eEA-lfII9TDGPpIDVFoJztUhMYtSkot2imlbaAo0pOzLRPuYB1pG76IvNEe32vpS6FOcVnSVdiVuH6jdDnRdr-Ls6Olop8nnmmFdThWdVp4u7xbH5EOw6-JP9u8RWV5e3J9fNze_rn6eL24aJ6Cthb1Ubhic8i0LiGwADQJwEEwFGwQozqHngQcFvXNOIjgWlA5gQ69llY_Itzl3zOn3rk5gNrE4v64Ffe1r2k5IzVn3X5CBQOx4W8HvM_hnnuyDGXPc2PxsEMzr2g205nXtBiv7ZR-66zd--Evu91wBOQNPce2f_51kLha3DEChUqg7XX2fZ99jmVJ-8wmAloHmVf8668EmYx9yLGZ5xwA5QMeVlpK_ABounv0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20411836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Pidgeon, A.M ; Radeloff, V.C ; Flather, C.H ; Lepczyk, C.A ; Clayton, M.K ; Hawbaker, T.J ; Hammer, R.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Pidgeon, A.M ; Radeloff, V.C ; Flather, C.H ; Lepczyk, C.A ; Clayton, M.K ; Hawbaker, T.J ; Hammer, R.B</creatorcontrib><description>In the United States, housing density has substantially increased in and adjacent to forests. Our goal in this study was to identify how housing density and human populations are associated with avian diversity. We compared these associations to those between landscape pattern and avian diversity, and we examined how these associations vary across the conterminous forested United States. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, the U.S. Census, and the National Land Cover Database, we focused on forest and woodland bird communities and conducted our analysis at multiple levels of model specificity, first using a coarse-thematic resolution (basic models), then using a larger number of fine-thematic resolution variables (refined models). We found that housing development was associated with forest bird species richness in all forested ecoregions of the conterminous United States. However, there were important differences among ecoregions. In the basic models, housing density accounted for &lt;5% of variance in avian species richness. In refined models, 85% of models included housing density and/or residential land cover as significant variables. The strongest guild response was demonstrated in the Adirondack-New England ecoregion, where 29% of variation in richness of the permanent resident guild was associated with housing density. Model improvements due to regional stratification were most pronounced for cavity nesters and short-distance migrants, suggesting that these guilds may be especially sensitive to regional processes. The varying patterns of association between avian richness and attributes associated with landscape structure suggested that landscape context was an important mediating factor affecting how biodiversity responds to landscape changes. Our analysis suggested that simple, broadly applicable, land use recommendations cannot be derived from our results. Rather, anticipating future avian response to land use intensification (or reversion to native vegetation) has to be conditioned on the current landscape context and the species group of interest. Our results show that housing density and residential land cover were significant predictors of forest bird species richness, and their prediction strengths are likely to increase as development continues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/06-1489.1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17974337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aves ; Biodiversity ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) ; Ecoregions ; Ecosystem ; estimated richness ; forest ; forest birds ; Forest cover ; Forest ecology ; forest habitats ; Forests ; geographical variation ; guilds ; Housing ; housing density ; human impact ; human population ; human-wildlife relations ; Humans ; Land cover ; landscape ; landscape ecology ; Mixed forests ; National Land Cover Data (NLCD) ; Population Density ; residential areas ; Species ; species diversity ; Trees ; U.S. Census ; United States ; wild birds ; woodland</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2007-10, Vol.17 (7), p.1989-2010</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2007 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2007 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40062093$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40062093$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974337$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pidgeon, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radeloff, V.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flather, C.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepczyk, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, R.B</creatorcontrib><title>Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>In the United States, housing density has substantially increased in and adjacent to forests. Our goal in this study was to identify how housing density and human populations are associated with avian diversity. We compared these associations to those between landscape pattern and avian diversity, and we examined how these associations vary across the conterminous forested United States. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, the U.S. Census, and the National Land Cover Database, we focused on forest and woodland bird communities and conducted our analysis at multiple levels of model specificity, first using a coarse-thematic resolution (basic models), then using a larger number of fine-thematic resolution variables (refined models). We found that housing development was associated with forest bird species richness in all forested ecoregions of the conterminous United States. However, there were important differences among ecoregions. In the basic models, housing density accounted for &lt;5% of variance in avian species richness. In refined models, 85% of models included housing density and/or residential land cover as significant variables. The strongest guild response was demonstrated in the Adirondack-New England ecoregion, where 29% of variation in richness of the permanent resident guild was associated with housing density. Model improvements due to regional stratification were most pronounced for cavity nesters and short-distance migrants, suggesting that these guilds may be especially sensitive to regional processes. The varying patterns of association between avian richness and attributes associated with landscape structure suggested that landscape context was an important mediating factor affecting how biodiversity responds to landscape changes. Our analysis suggested that simple, broadly applicable, land use recommendations cannot be derived from our results. Rather, anticipating future avian response to land use intensification (or reversion to native vegetation) has to be conditioned on the current landscape context and the species group of interest. Our results show that housing density and residential land cover were significant predictors of forest bird species richness, and their prediction strengths are likely to increase as development continues.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding Bird Survey (BBS)</subject><subject>Ecoregions</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>estimated richness</subject><subject>forest</subject><subject>forest birds</subject><subject>Forest cover</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>forest habitats</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>geographical variation</subject><subject>guilds</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>housing density</subject><subject>human impact</subject><subject>human population</subject><subject>human-wildlife relations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>landscape ecology</subject><subject>Mixed forests</subject><subject>National Land Cover Data (NLCD)</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>residential areas</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>U.S. Census</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>wild birds</subject><subject>woodland</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtrHDEQhEVIiB3bB_-AJDoFchinW4_R6LgYPwKGGOw9C41G8srsribSLMb_3nJmcU4hOkiC-qqobkJOEc6w0_AD2gZFp8_wHTlEzXUjZcfe1z9IbEC1eEA-lfII9TDGPpIDVFoJztUhMYtSkot2imlbaAo0pOzLRPuYB1pG76IvNEe32vpS6FOcVnSVdiVuH6jdDnRdr-Ls6Olop8nnmmFdThWdVp4u7xbH5EOw6-JP9u8RWV5e3J9fNze_rn6eL24aJ6Cthb1Ubhic8i0LiGwADQJwEEwFGwQozqHngQcFvXNOIjgWlA5gQ69llY_Itzl3zOn3rk5gNrE4v64Ffe1r2k5IzVn3X5CBQOx4W8HvM_hnnuyDGXPc2PxsEMzr2g205nXtBiv7ZR-66zd--Evu91wBOQNPce2f_51kLha3DEChUqg7XX2fZ99jmVJ-8wmAloHmVf8668EmYx9yLGZ5xwA5QMeVlpK_ABounv0</recordid><startdate>200710</startdate><enddate>200710</enddate><creator>Pidgeon, A.M</creator><creator>Radeloff, V.C</creator><creator>Flather, C.H</creator><creator>Lepczyk, C.A</creator><creator>Clayton, M.K</creator><creator>Hawbaker, T.J</creator><creator>Hammer, R.B</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200710</creationdate><title>Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA</title><author>Pidgeon, A.M ; Radeloff, V.C ; Flather, C.H ; Lepczyk, C.A ; Clayton, M.K ; Hawbaker, T.J ; Hammer, R.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding Bird Survey (BBS)</topic><topic>Ecoregions</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>estimated richness</topic><topic>forest</topic><topic>forest birds</topic><topic>Forest cover</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>forest habitats</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>geographical variation</topic><topic>guilds</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>housing density</topic><topic>human impact</topic><topic>human population</topic><topic>human-wildlife relations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>landscape ecology</topic><topic>Mixed forests</topic><topic>National Land Cover Data (NLCD)</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>residential areas</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>U.S. Census</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>wild birds</topic><topic>woodland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pidgeon, A.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radeloff, V.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flather, C.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepczyk, C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clayton, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawbaker, T.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammer, R.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pidgeon, A.M</au><au>Radeloff, V.C</au><au>Flather, C.H</au><au>Lepczyk, C.A</au><au>Clayton, M.K</au><au>Hawbaker, T.J</au><au>Hammer, R.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2007-10</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1989</spage><epage>2010</epage><pages>1989-2010</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>In the United States, housing density has substantially increased in and adjacent to forests. Our goal in this study was to identify how housing density and human populations are associated with avian diversity. We compared these associations to those between landscape pattern and avian diversity, and we examined how these associations vary across the conterminous forested United States. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, the U.S. Census, and the National Land Cover Database, we focused on forest and woodland bird communities and conducted our analysis at multiple levels of model specificity, first using a coarse-thematic resolution (basic models), then using a larger number of fine-thematic resolution variables (refined models). We found that housing development was associated with forest bird species richness in all forested ecoregions of the conterminous United States. However, there were important differences among ecoregions. In the basic models, housing density accounted for &lt;5% of variance in avian species richness. In refined models, 85% of models included housing density and/or residential land cover as significant variables. The strongest guild response was demonstrated in the Adirondack-New England ecoregion, where 29% of variation in richness of the permanent resident guild was associated with housing density. Model improvements due to regional stratification were most pronounced for cavity nesters and short-distance migrants, suggesting that these guilds may be especially sensitive to regional processes. The varying patterns of association between avian richness and attributes associated with landscape structure suggested that landscape context was an important mediating factor affecting how biodiversity responds to landscape changes. Our analysis suggested that simple, broadly applicable, land use recommendations cannot be derived from our results. Rather, anticipating future avian response to land use intensification (or reversion to native vegetation) has to be conditioned on the current landscape context and the species group of interest. Our results show that housing density and residential land cover were significant predictors of forest bird species richness, and their prediction strengths are likely to increase as development continues.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><pmid>17974337</pmid><doi>10.1890/06-1489.1</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2007-10, Vol.17 (7), p.1989-2010
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68459328
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Aves
Biodiversity
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding Bird Survey (BBS)
Ecoregions
Ecosystem
estimated richness
forest
forest birds
Forest cover
Forest ecology
forest habitats
Forests
geographical variation
guilds
Housing
housing density
human impact
human population
human-wildlife relations
Humans
Land cover
landscape
landscape ecology
Mixed forests
National Land Cover Data (NLCD)
Population Density
residential areas
Species
species diversity
Trees
U.S. Census
United States
wild birds
woodland
title Associations of forest bird species richness with housing and landscape patterns across the USA
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-09T01%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations%20of%20forest%20bird%20species%20richness%20with%20housing%20and%20landscape%20patterns%20across%20the%20USA&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Pidgeon,%20A.M&rft.date=2007-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1989&rft.epage=2010&rft.pages=1989-2010&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/06-1489.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40062093%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4069-5e57cddc7e62f112d090401d427faf407330b3f3f70bccc510c2f79f0afb95073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20411836&rft_id=info:pmid/17974337&rft_jstor_id=40062093&rfr_iscdi=true