Loading…
Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil
In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563 |
container_end_page | 754 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 748 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Reeder, Scott B. Wintersperger, Bernd J. Dietrich, Olaf Lanz, Titus Greiser, Andreas Reiser, Maximilian F. Glazer, Gary M. Schoenberg, Stefan O. |
description | In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.20636 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68524983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19411554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgr5BYuPU9CbtSQSmaFoRASGysM44zY3DiYGcofRzetO5c6ArVGy_8_Z91zo_Qc0aPGKX8uE_9Eada6AdoxhTnhKtGPkQzWklKBGvkAXqS8w9KadNU8jE6YJrW5agZ-vspgZ28hYBhHFMEu3IZTxFPK4fdbwhrmHwccOxw9ssBApkiGaLPDqfbFzy61MXUw2AdvvLTCo-QIAQXsO9h6Yfla3wyjqH8sPFsEAup9WD3BIahxYAFJ3YFw1Cie8BGH56iRx2E7J7t7kP09d3bL6fvyfzj2fnpyZxYKbgmvKZQad0JxYArwZUC0VkGqgbqgEqxqDhvFq3UuupYqxtgtqY1cw3rnFBaHKKXW2_Zwq-1y5PpfbYuBBhcXGeja8VlU4t7wbJvxpSSBXy1BW2KOSfXmTGVkdO1YdTcFmdKcWZTXGFf7KTrRe_aO3LXVAGOt8CVD-76_yZz8fliryTbhM-T-_MvAemn0ZWolPl2eWYu5Yf5G_WdGyVuAPBwst8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19411554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20636</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16088885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>cardiac imaging ; CINE ; Female ; g-factor ; Heart - anatomy & histology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation ; Male ; parallel imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; phased array coils ; signal-to-noise ratio ; steady-state free precession ; TSENSE</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16088885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanz, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>cardiac imaging</subject><subject>CINE</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>g-factor</subject><subject>Heart - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>parallel imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>phased array coils</subject><subject>signal-to-noise ratio</subject><subject>steady-state free precession</subject><subject>TSENSE</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgr5BYuPU9CbtSQSmaFoRASGysM44zY3DiYGcofRzetO5c6ArVGy_8_Z91zo_Qc0aPGKX8uE_9Eada6AdoxhTnhKtGPkQzWklKBGvkAXqS8w9KadNU8jE6YJrW5agZ-vspgZ28hYBhHFMEu3IZTxFPK4fdbwhrmHwccOxw9ssBApkiGaLPDqfbFzy61MXUw2AdvvLTCo-QIAQXsO9h6Yfla3wyjqH8sPFsEAup9WD3BIahxYAFJ3YFw1Cie8BGH56iRx2E7J7t7kP09d3bL6fvyfzj2fnpyZxYKbgmvKZQad0JxYArwZUC0VkGqgbqgEqxqDhvFq3UuupYqxtgtqY1cw3rnFBaHKKXW2_Zwq-1y5PpfbYuBBhcXGeja8VlU4t7wbJvxpSSBXy1BW2KOSfXmTGVkdO1YdTcFmdKcWZTXGFf7KTrRe_aO3LXVAGOt8CVD-76_yZz8fliryTbhM-T-_MvAemn0ZWolPl2eWYu5Yf5G_WdGyVuAPBwst8</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Reeder, Scott B.</creator><creator>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creator><creator>Dietrich, Olaf</creator><creator>Lanz, Titus</creator><creator>Greiser, Andreas</creator><creator>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creator><creator>Glazer, Gary M.</creator><creator>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><author>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>cardiac imaging</topic><topic>CINE</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>g-factor</topic><topic>Heart - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>parallel imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>phased array coils</topic><topic>signal-to-noise ratio</topic><topic>steady-state free precession</topic><topic>TSENSE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanz, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeder, Scott B.</au><au>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</au><au>Dietrich, Olaf</au><au>Lanz, Titus</au><au>Greiser, Andreas</au><au>Reiser, Maximilian F.</au><au>Glazer, Gary M.</au><au>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>748-754</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16088885</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20636</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68524983 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | cardiac imaging CINE Female g-factor Heart - anatomy & histology Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted magnetic resonance Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation Male parallel imaging Phantoms, Imaging phased array coils signal-to-noise ratio steady-state free precession TSENSE |
title | Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20approaches%20to%20the%20evaluation%20of%20signal-to-noise%20ratio%20performance%20with%20parallel%20imaging:%20Application%20with%20cardiac%20imaging%20and%20a%2032-channel%20cardiac%20coil&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Reeder,%20Scott%20B.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=748-754&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20636&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19411554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19411554&rft_id=info:pmid/16088885&rfr_iscdi=true |