Loading…

Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil

In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754
Main Authors: Reeder, Scott B., Wintersperger, Bernd J., Dietrich, Olaf, Lanz, Titus, Greiser, Andreas, Reiser, Maximilian F., Glazer, Gary M., Schoenberg, Stefan O.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563
container_end_page 754
container_issue 3
container_start_page 748
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 54
creator Reeder, Scott B.
Wintersperger, Bernd J.
Dietrich, Olaf
Lanz, Titus
Greiser, Andreas
Reiser, Maximilian F.
Glazer, Gary M.
Schoenberg, Stefan O.
description In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.20636
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68524983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19411554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgr5BYuPU9CbtSQSmaFoRASGysM44zY3DiYGcofRzetO5c6ArVGy_8_Z91zo_Qc0aPGKX8uE_9Eada6AdoxhTnhKtGPkQzWklKBGvkAXqS8w9KadNU8jE6YJrW5agZ-vspgZ28hYBhHFMEu3IZTxFPK4fdbwhrmHwccOxw9ssBApkiGaLPDqfbFzy61MXUw2AdvvLTCo-QIAQXsO9h6Yfla3wyjqH8sPFsEAup9WD3BIahxYAFJ3YFw1Cie8BGH56iRx2E7J7t7kP09d3bL6fvyfzj2fnpyZxYKbgmvKZQad0JxYArwZUC0VkGqgbqgEqxqDhvFq3UuupYqxtgtqY1cw3rnFBaHKKXW2_Zwq-1y5PpfbYuBBhcXGeja8VlU4t7wbJvxpSSBXy1BW2KOSfXmTGVkdO1YdTcFmdKcWZTXGFf7KTrRe_aO3LXVAGOt8CVD-76_yZz8fliryTbhM-T-_MvAemn0ZWolPl2eWYu5Yf5G_WdGyVuAPBwst8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19411554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20636</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16088885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>cardiac imaging ; CINE ; Female ; g-factor ; Heart - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation ; Male ; parallel imaging ; Phantoms, Imaging ; phased array coils ; signal-to-noise ratio ; steady-state free precession ; TSENSE</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16088885$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanz, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>cardiac imaging</subject><subject>CINE</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>g-factor</subject><subject>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>parallel imaging</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>phased array coils</subject><subject>signal-to-noise ratio</subject><subject>steady-state free precession</subject><subject>TSENSE</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctu1DAUhi0EokNhwQsgr5BYuPU9CbtSQSmaFoRASGysM44zY3DiYGcofRzetO5c6ArVGy_8_Z91zo_Qc0aPGKX8uE_9Eada6AdoxhTnhKtGPkQzWklKBGvkAXqS8w9KadNU8jE6YJrW5agZ-vspgZ28hYBhHFMEu3IZTxFPK4fdbwhrmHwccOxw9ssBApkiGaLPDqfbFzy61MXUw2AdvvLTCo-QIAQXsO9h6Yfla3wyjqH8sPFsEAup9WD3BIahxYAFJ3YFw1Cie8BGH56iRx2E7J7t7kP09d3bL6fvyfzj2fnpyZxYKbgmvKZQad0JxYArwZUC0VkGqgbqgEqxqDhvFq3UuupYqxtgtqY1cw3rnFBaHKKXW2_Zwq-1y5PpfbYuBBhcXGeja8VlU4t7wbJvxpSSBXy1BW2KOSfXmTGVkdO1YdTcFmdKcWZTXGFf7KTrRe_aO3LXVAGOt8CVD-76_yZz8fliryTbhM-T-_MvAemn0ZWolPl2eWYu5Yf5G_WdGyVuAPBwst8</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Reeder, Scott B.</creator><creator>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creator><creator>Dietrich, Olaf</creator><creator>Lanz, Titus</creator><creator>Greiser, Andreas</creator><creator>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creator><creator>Glazer, Gary M.</creator><creator>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</title><author>Reeder, Scott B. ; Wintersperger, Bernd J. ; Dietrich, Olaf ; Lanz, Titus ; Greiser, Andreas ; Reiser, Maximilian F. ; Glazer, Gary M. ; Schoenberg, Stefan O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>cardiac imaging</topic><topic>CINE</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>g-factor</topic><topic>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>parallel imaging</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>phased array coils</topic><topic>signal-to-noise ratio</topic><topic>steady-state free precession</topic><topic>TSENSE</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeder, Scott B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietrich, Olaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanz, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greiser, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiser, Maximilian F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glazer, Gary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeder, Scott B.</au><au>Wintersperger, Bernd J.</au><au>Dietrich, Olaf</au><au>Lanz, Titus</au><au>Greiser, Andreas</au><au>Reiser, Maximilian F.</au><au>Glazer, Gary M.</au><au>Schoenberg, Stefan O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>748</spage><epage>754</epage><pages>748-754</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>In this work, two practical methods for the measurement of signal‐to‐noise‐ratio (SNR) performance in parallel imaging are described. Phantoms and human studies were performed with a 32‐channel cardiac coil in the context of ultrafast cardiac CINE imaging at 1.5 T using steady‐state free precession (SSFP) and TSENSE. SNR and g‐factor phantom measurements using a “multiple acquisition” method were compared to measurements from a “difference method”. Excellent agreement was seen between the two methods, and the g‐factor shows qualitative agreement with theoretical predictions from the literature. Examples of high temporal (42.6 ms) and spatial (2.1 × 2.1 × 8 mm3) resolution cardiac CINE SSFP images acquired from human volunteers using TSENSE are shown for acceleration factors up to 7. Image quality agrees qualitatively with phantom SNR measurements, suggesting an optimum acceleration of 4. With this acceleration, a cardiac function study consisting of 6 image planes (3 short‐axis views, 3 long‐axis views) was obtained in an 18‐heartbeat breath‐hold. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16088885</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20636</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.748-754
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68524983
source Wiley
subjects cardiac imaging
CINE
Female
g-factor
Heart - anatomy & histology
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine - instrumentation
Male
parallel imaging
Phantoms, Imaging
phased array coils
signal-to-noise ratio
steady-state free precession
TSENSE
title Practical approaches to the evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio performance with parallel imaging: Application with cardiac imaging and a 32-channel cardiac coil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A29%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Practical%20approaches%20to%20the%20evaluation%20of%20signal-to-noise%20ratio%20performance%20with%20parallel%20imaging:%20Application%20with%20cardiac%20imaging%20and%20a%2032-channel%20cardiac%20coil&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Reeder,%20Scott%20B.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=748&rft.epage=754&rft.pages=748-754&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20636&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19411554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4326-280a766f351a253255a3fc1a58a0ea043b7229bd4667f1d69a1c8081e91fe3563%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19411554&rft_id=info:pmid/16088885&rfr_iscdi=true