Loading…

Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding

In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655
Main Authors: DiCarlo, Julie C., Hargreaves, Brian A., Nayak, Krishna S., Hu, Bob S., Pauly, John M., Nishimura, Dwight G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3
container_end_page 655
container_issue 3
container_start_page 645
container_title Magnetic resonance in medicine
container_volume 54
creator DiCarlo, Julie C.
Hargreaves, Brian A.
Nayak, Krishna S.
Hu, Bob S.
Pauly, John M.
Nishimura, Dwight G.
description In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrm.20594
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68527642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68527642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQV0gs0voZx0vEoyC1RYJCl5bjTCCQR7FToH9PSgqsELOZkebcuzgIHRI8IBjTYeGKAcVC8S3UJYLSgDb3NupiyXHAiOIdtOf9M8ZYKcl3UYeEOGqGdRF7MC4zcQ5BAqXP6lW_KiHwT1XdT6uly8D13yCv7PoDpa2SrHzcRzupyT0cbHYP3V9ezM6ugvHN6PrsdBxYTiUPRBRbRSQngqQYQmVowqiMAJIojiWjkUoVx0IobGNsJFdGWCwSEoWJZWAS1kPHbe_CVa9L8LUuMm8hz00J1dLrMBJUhpz-CzYGSEgJacCTFrSu8t5BqhcuK4xbaYL1WqVuVOovlQ17tCldxgUkv-TGXQMMW-A9y2H1d5Oe3E6-K4M2kfkaPn4Sxr3oUDIp9Hw60tPZnRiT-bmesU9rtIu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19416211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</creator><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><description>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16088883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging ; Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology ; Fourier Analysis ; Fourier velocity encoding ; Hemorheology - instrumentation ; Humans ; magnetic resonance imaging ; peak velocity ; Phantoms, Imaging ; quantitative flow imaging ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; variable-density sampling</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16088883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Fourier velocity encoding</subject><subject>Hemorheology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>peak velocity</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>quantitative flow imaging</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>variable-density sampling</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQV0gs0voZx0vEoyC1RYJCl5bjTCCQR7FToH9PSgqsELOZkebcuzgIHRI8IBjTYeGKAcVC8S3UJYLSgDb3NupiyXHAiOIdtOf9M8ZYKcl3UYeEOGqGdRF7MC4zcQ5BAqXP6lW_KiHwT1XdT6uly8D13yCv7PoDpa2SrHzcRzupyT0cbHYP3V9ezM6ugvHN6PrsdBxYTiUPRBRbRSQngqQYQmVowqiMAJIojiWjkUoVx0IobGNsJFdGWCwSEoWJZWAS1kPHbe_CVa9L8LUuMm8hz00J1dLrMBJUhpz-CzYGSEgJacCTFrSu8t5BqhcuK4xbaYL1WqVuVOovlQ17tCldxgUkv-TGXQMMW-A9y2H1d5Oe3E6-K4M2kfkaPn4Sxr3oUDIp9Hw60tPZnRiT-bmesU9rtIu8</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creator><creator>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creator><creator>Nayak, Krishna S.</creator><creator>Hu, Bob S.</creator><creator>Pauly, John M.</creator><creator>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><author>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Fourier velocity encoding</topic><topic>Hemorheology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>peak velocity</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>quantitative flow imaging</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>variable-density sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiCarlo, Julie C.</au><au>Hargreaves, Brian A.</au><au>Nayak, Krishna S.</au><au>Hu, Bob S.</au><au>Pauly, John M.</au><au>Nishimura, Dwight G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>645-655</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16088883</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20594</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0740-3194
ispartof Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655
issn 0740-3194
1522-2594
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68527642
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Aorta, Abdominal - physiology
Blood Flow Velocity - physiology
Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging
Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology
Fourier Analysis
Fourier velocity encoding
Hemorheology - instrumentation
Humans
magnetic resonance imaging
peak velocity
Phantoms, Imaging
quantitative flow imaging
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Ultrasonography, Doppler
variable-density sampling
title Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variable-density%20one-shot%20fourier%20velocity%20encoding&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=DiCarlo,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=645-655&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68527642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19416211&rft_id=info:pmid/16088883&rfr_iscdi=true