Loading…
Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding
In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3 |
container_end_page | 655 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 645 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | DiCarlo, Julie C. Hargreaves, Brian A. Nayak, Krishna S. Hu, Bob S. Pauly, John M. Nishimura, Dwight G. |
description | In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.20594 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68527642</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68527642</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQV0gs0voZx0vEoyC1RYJCl5bjTCCQR7FToH9PSgqsELOZkebcuzgIHRI8IBjTYeGKAcVC8S3UJYLSgDb3NupiyXHAiOIdtOf9M8ZYKcl3UYeEOGqGdRF7MC4zcQ5BAqXP6lW_KiHwT1XdT6uly8D13yCv7PoDpa2SrHzcRzupyT0cbHYP3V9ezM6ugvHN6PrsdBxYTiUPRBRbRSQngqQYQmVowqiMAJIojiWjkUoVx0IobGNsJFdGWCwSEoWJZWAS1kPHbe_CVa9L8LUuMm8hz00J1dLrMBJUhpz-CzYGSEgJacCTFrSu8t5BqhcuK4xbaYL1WqVuVOovlQ17tCldxgUkv-TGXQMMW-A9y2H1d5Oe3E6-K4M2kfkaPn4Sxr3oUDIp9Hw60tPZnRiT-bmesU9rtIu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19416211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</creator><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><description>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20594</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16088883</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology ; Blood Flow Velocity - physiology ; Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging ; Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology ; Fourier Analysis ; Fourier velocity encoding ; Hemorheology - instrumentation ; Humans ; magnetic resonance imaging ; peak velocity ; Phantoms, Imaging ; quantitative flow imaging ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Ultrasonography, Doppler ; variable-density sampling</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16088883$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Fourier Analysis</subject><subject>Fourier velocity encoding</subject><subject>Hemorheology - instrumentation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>peak velocity</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>quantitative flow imaging</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler</subject><subject>variable-density sampling</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4AdQV0gs0voZx0vEoyC1RYJCl5bjTCCQR7FToH9PSgqsELOZkebcuzgIHRI8IBjTYeGKAcVC8S3UJYLSgDb3NupiyXHAiOIdtOf9M8ZYKcl3UYeEOGqGdRF7MC4zcQ5BAqXP6lW_KiHwT1XdT6uly8D13yCv7PoDpa2SrHzcRzupyT0cbHYP3V9ezM6ugvHN6PrsdBxYTiUPRBRbRSQngqQYQmVowqiMAJIojiWjkUoVx0IobGNsJFdGWCwSEoWJZWAS1kPHbe_CVa9L8LUuMm8hz00J1dLrMBJUhpz-CzYGSEgJacCTFrSu8t5BqhcuK4xbaYL1WqVuVOovlQ17tCldxgUkv-TGXQMMW-A9y2H1d5Oe3E6-K4M2kfkaPn4Sxr3oUDIp9Hw60tPZnRiT-bmesU9rtIu8</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creator><creator>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creator><creator>Nayak, Krishna S.</creator><creator>Hu, Bob S.</creator><creator>Pauly, John M.</creator><creator>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</title><author>DiCarlo, Julie C. ; Hargreaves, Brian A. ; Nayak, Krishna S. ; Hu, Bob S. ; Pauly, John M. ; Nishimura, Dwight G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aorta, Abdominal - physiology</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity - physiology</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Fourier Analysis</topic><topic>Fourier velocity encoding</topic><topic>Hemorheology - instrumentation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>peak velocity</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>quantitative flow imaging</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler</topic><topic>variable-density sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DiCarlo, Julie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, Brian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nayak, Krishna S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Bob S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pauly, John M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishimura, Dwight G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DiCarlo, Julie C.</au><au>Hargreaves, Brian A.</au><au>Nayak, Krishna S.</au><au>Hu, Bob S.</au><au>Pauly, John M.</au><au>Nishimura, Dwight G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>645</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>645-655</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>In areas of highly pulsatile and turbulent flow, real‐time imaging with high temporal, spatial, and velocity resolution is essential. The use of 1D Fourier velocity encoding (FVE) was previously demonstrated for velocity measurement in real time, with fewer effects resulting from off‐resonance. The application of variable‐density sampling is proposed to improve velocity measurement without a significant increase in readout time or the addition of aliasing artifacts. Two sequence comparisons are presented to improve velocity resolution or increase the velocity field of view (FOV) to unambiguously measure velocities up to 5 m/s without aliasing. The results from a tube flow phantom, a stenosis phantom, and healthy volunteers are presented, along with a comparison of measurements using Doppler ultrasound (US). The studies confirm that variable‐density acquisition of kz‐kv space improves the velocity resolution and FOV of such data, with the greatest impact on the improvement of FOV to include velocities in stenotic ranges. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>16088883</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.20594</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2005-09, Vol.54 (3), p.645-655 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68527642 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Aorta, Abdominal - physiology Blood Flow Velocity - physiology Constriction, Pathologic - diagnostic imaging Constriction, Pathologic - physiopathology Fourier Analysis Fourier velocity encoding Hemorheology - instrumentation Humans magnetic resonance imaging peak velocity Phantoms, Imaging quantitative flow imaging Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Ultrasonography, Doppler variable-density sampling |
title | Variable-density one-shot fourier velocity encoding |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A59%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variable-density%20one-shot%20fourier%20velocity%20encoding&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=DiCarlo,%20Julie%20C.&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=645&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=645-655&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.20594&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68527642%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4274-58bc9174151f0e69a2d3278eed8bb73289f9405590cb0a749a5c05d186dc3ead3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19416211&rft_id=info:pmid/16088883&rfr_iscdi=true |