Loading…
Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso
Objective: This study was implemented to describe safe motherhood programs in Burkina Faso for planning and programming purposes. Methods: Twenty safe motherhood programs were described from November 2003 through May 2004 using a structured questionnaire, interviews with safe motherhood program mana...
Saved in:
| Published in: | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics 2005-10, Vol.91 (1), p.97-104 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3 |
| container_end_page | 104 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 97 |
| container_title | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics |
| container_volume | 91 |
| creator | Hounton, S.H. Meda, N. Hussein, J. Sombie, I. Conombo, G. Graham, W.J. |
| description | Objective: This study was implemented to describe safe motherhood programs in Burkina Faso for planning and programming purposes.
Methods: Twenty safe motherhood programs were described from November 2003 through May 2004 using a structured questionnaire, interviews with safe motherhood program managers and document reviews.
Results: Only 2 of the 20 programs were designed to improve the availability of comprehensive emergency obstetric care, and only 2 comprehensively addressed all components of skilled attendance at delivery. Other gaps identified included poor availability of baseline data, few monitoring measures, and lack of planning for evaluation needs. National geographical coverage was also uneven.
Conclusion: A systematic overview of safe motherhood programs in a country can help to set priorities and aid in decision making for the allocation of resources towards contextually relevant strategies to curtail maternal mortality and severe morbidity. Planning for program design and evaluation may also be aided by such a process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.027 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68571920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0020729205004030</els_id><sourcerecordid>68571920</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1rGzEURUVJaZy0f6CLoFV2M3mSPNKodJM4zUcJBEq6FhrNky3HYyXSuMX_vjI2ZBe6Eg_OvVwdQr4yqBkwebGsw3Ieaw7Q1CBr4OoDmbBW6UpMlT4iEwAOleKaH5OTnJcAwBRjn8gxk4w1UjQT8usas0uhC-s5zdYjHeK4wLSIsacvKc6THTL1MZUjxBTGLc04joX-Rp8WSJ3NSKOnV5v0HNaW3tgcP5OP3q4yfjm8p-T3zY-n2V318Hh7P7t8qNy07KiEF7ZBpXhv0TXokDvfYucEaNfJ1raddko0vcNm2nLdil6w3gJ6rWXnu06ckvN9b9n5usE8miFkh6uVXWPcZCPbRjHNoYB8D7oUc07oTfnMYNPWMDA7k2ZpdibNzqQBaYrJEjo7tG-6Afu3yEFdAeQe-BtWuP2PSnP_8_ZR75q_74NY5PwJmEx2AdcO-5DQjaaP4b1h_wBPE5dE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68571920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Hounton, S.H. ; Meda, N. ; Hussein, J. ; Sombie, I. ; Conombo, G. ; Graham, W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hounton, S.H. ; Meda, N. ; Hussein, J. ; Sombie, I. ; Conombo, G. ; Graham, W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study was implemented to describe safe motherhood programs in Burkina Faso for planning and programming purposes.
Methods: Twenty safe motherhood programs were described from November 2003 through May 2004 using a structured questionnaire, interviews with safe motherhood program managers and document reviews.
Results: Only 2 of the 20 programs were designed to improve the availability of comprehensive emergency obstetric care, and only 2 comprehensively addressed all components of skilled attendance at delivery. Other gaps identified included poor availability of baseline data, few monitoring measures, and lack of planning for evaluation needs. National geographical coverage was also uneven.
Conclusion: A systematic overview of safe motherhood programs in a country can help to set priorities and aid in decision making for the allocation of resources towards contextually relevant strategies to curtail maternal mortality and severe morbidity. Planning for program design and evaluation may also be aided by such a process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7292</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16115635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Burkina Faso ; Burkina Faso - epidemiology ; Design ; Female ; Gaps ; Health Planning ; Health Priorities ; Humans ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; Maternal Mortality ; Maternal Welfare ; Policy ; Pregnancy ; Public Health ; Quality Assurance, Health Care ; Safe motherhood programs ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2005-10, Vol.91 (1), p.97-104</ispartof><rights>2005 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16115635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hounton, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meda, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sombie, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conombo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso</title><title>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Objective: This study was implemented to describe safe motherhood programs in Burkina Faso for planning and programming purposes.
Methods: Twenty safe motherhood programs were described from November 2003 through May 2004 using a structured questionnaire, interviews with safe motherhood program managers and document reviews.
Results: Only 2 of the 20 programs were designed to improve the availability of comprehensive emergency obstetric care, and only 2 comprehensively addressed all components of skilled attendance at delivery. Other gaps identified included poor availability of baseline data, few monitoring measures, and lack of planning for evaluation needs. National geographical coverage was also uneven.
Conclusion: A systematic overview of safe motherhood programs in a country can help to set priorities and aid in decision making for the allocation of resources towards contextually relevant strategies to curtail maternal mortality and severe morbidity. Planning for program design and evaluation may also be aided by such a process.</description><subject>Burkina Faso</subject><subject>Burkina Faso - epidemiology</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gaps</subject><subject>Health Planning</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Maternal Mortality</subject><subject>Maternal Welfare</subject><subject>Policy</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care</subject><subject>Safe motherhood programs</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0020-7292</issn><issn>1879-3479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1rGzEURUVJaZy0f6CLoFV2M3mSPNKodJM4zUcJBEq6FhrNky3HYyXSuMX_vjI2ZBe6Eg_OvVwdQr4yqBkwebGsw3Ieaw7Q1CBr4OoDmbBW6UpMlT4iEwAOleKaH5OTnJcAwBRjn8gxk4w1UjQT8usas0uhC-s5zdYjHeK4wLSIsacvKc6THTL1MZUjxBTGLc04joX-Rp8WSJ3NSKOnV5v0HNaW3tgcP5OP3q4yfjm8p-T3zY-n2V318Hh7P7t8qNy07KiEF7ZBpXhv0TXokDvfYucEaNfJ1raddko0vcNm2nLdil6w3gJ6rWXnu06ckvN9b9n5usE8miFkh6uVXWPcZCPbRjHNoYB8D7oUc07oTfnMYNPWMDA7k2ZpdibNzqQBaYrJEjo7tG-6Afu3yEFdAeQe-BtWuP2PSnP_8_ZR75q_74NY5PwJmEx2AdcO-5DQjaaP4b1h_wBPE5dE</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Hounton, S.H.</creator><creator>Meda, N.</creator><creator>Hussein, J.</creator><creator>Sombie, I.</creator><creator>Conombo, G.</creator><creator>Graham, W.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso</title><author>Hounton, S.H. ; Meda, N. ; Hussein, J. ; Sombie, I. ; Conombo, G. ; Graham, W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Burkina Faso</topic><topic>Burkina Faso - epidemiology</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gaps</topic><topic>Health Planning</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Maternal Mortality</topic><topic>Maternal Welfare</topic><topic>Policy</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care</topic><topic>Safe motherhood programs</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hounton, S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meda, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hussein, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sombie, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conombo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hounton, S.H.</au><au>Meda, N.</au><au>Hussein, J.</au><au>Sombie, I.</au><au>Conombo, G.</au><au>Graham, W.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso</atitle><jtitle>International journal of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Gynaecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>97-104</pages><issn>0020-7292</issn><eissn>1879-3479</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study was implemented to describe safe motherhood programs in Burkina Faso for planning and programming purposes.
Methods: Twenty safe motherhood programs were described from November 2003 through May 2004 using a structured questionnaire, interviews with safe motherhood program managers and document reviews.
Results: Only 2 of the 20 programs were designed to improve the availability of comprehensive emergency obstetric care, and only 2 comprehensively addressed all components of skilled attendance at delivery. Other gaps identified included poor availability of baseline data, few monitoring measures, and lack of planning for evaluation needs. National geographical coverage was also uneven.
Conclusion: A systematic overview of safe motherhood programs in a country can help to set priorities and aid in decision making for the allocation of resources towards contextually relevant strategies to curtail maternal mortality and severe morbidity. Planning for program design and evaluation may also be aided by such a process.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>16115635</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.027</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0020-7292 |
| ispartof | International journal of gynecology and obstetrics, 2005-10, Vol.91 (1), p.97-104 |
| issn | 0020-7292 1879-3479 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68571920 |
| source | Wiley |
| subjects | Burkina Faso Burkina Faso - epidemiology Design Female Gaps Health Planning Health Priorities Humans Maternal Health Services - standards Maternal Mortality Maternal Welfare Policy Pregnancy Public Health Quality Assurance, Health Care Safe motherhood programs Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Describing safe motherhood programs for priority setting: The case of Burkina Faso |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A24%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Describing%20safe%20motherhood%20programs%20for%20priority%20setting:%20The%20case%20of%20Burkina%20Faso&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=Hounton,%20S.H.&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=97-104&rft.issn=0020-7292&rft.eissn=1879-3479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.06.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68571920%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4017-3f3a5e772daec5ece2cf8ebc309cb68a8b9c735dce5482983d31da0ef996bfbb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68571920&rft_id=info:pmid/16115635&rfr_iscdi=true |