Loading…

Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain

The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-ai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health Environment & Health, 2005-08, Vol.31 (4), p.249-257
Main Authors: Hlobil, Hynek, Staal, J Bart, Spoelstra, Maaike, Ariëns, Geertje AM, Smid, Tjabe, van Mechelen, Willem
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-4018019b297dd9c7180c4cfce1f030dda429656473698d1bb3385fba8873fcaf3
cites
container_end_page 257
container_issue 4
container_start_page 249
container_title Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
container_volume 31
creator Hlobil, Hynek
Staal, J Bart
Spoelstra, Maaike
Ariëns, Geertje AM
Smid, Tjabe
van Mechelen, Willem
description The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after > 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is.
doi_str_mv 10.5271/sjweh.880
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68578370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>03553140_200507_201011100057_201011100057_249_257</airiti_id><jstor_id>40967500</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40967500</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-4018019b297dd9c7180c4cfce1f030dda429656473698d1bb3385fba8873fcaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFqGzEQhkVpaBy3hz5Awl4ayGHT0UpaScdg0sRgSCAJ9Ca0WonKWa9SSVvTt48cmwaKDqOf-ZiBbxD6iuGSNRx_T-ut_XUpBHxAM8wlq6WEnx_RDAhjNcEUjtFJSmuARhb-EzrGbXkc-Awtr52zJvs_drQpVcFVuoo2T3Gsc6i3IT5XyzHbWPrZh7FyIVYPU6fNlG01hG1dvs_VvfbjZ3Tk9JDsl0Odo6cf14-L23p1d7NcXK1qTSXkmgIWgGXXSN730vCSDDXOWOyAQN9r2siWtZSTVooedx0hgrlOC8GJM9qROTrfz32J4fdkU1Ybn4wdBj3aMCXVCsYF4VDAiz1oYkgpWqdeot_o-FdhUDtv6s2bKt4Ke3YYOnUb27-TB1EF-HYAdDJ6cFGPxqd3jgPljMjCne65dcoh_utTkC1nsFt0u-9rH332ah2K6qJL7W61O5VqABjwUjBgjKGk_wOVqmGcvAIDjJLf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68578370</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Hlobil, Hynek ; Staal, J Bart ; Spoelstra, Maaike ; Ariëns, Geertje AM ; Smid, Tjabe ; van Mechelen, Willem</creator><creatorcontrib>Hlobil, Hynek ; Staal, J Bart ; Spoelstra, Maaike ; Ariëns, Geertje AM ; Smid, Tjabe ; van Mechelen, Willem</creatorcontrib><description>The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after &gt; 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0355-3140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1795-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.880</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16161707</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Helsinki: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</publisher><subject>Back pain ; Behavior Therapy - methods ; Biological and medical sciences ; Control groups ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Diseases of the spine ; Ergonomics ; Experimentation ; Health care outcome assessment ; Humans ; Low back pain ; Low Back Pain - psychology ; Low Back Pain - rehabilitation ; Medical sciences ; Pain ; Patient Education as Topic ; Psychoeducational intervention ; Randomized controlled trials ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods ; Rehabilitation, Vocational - psychology ; Review ; Severity of Illness Index ; Sick Leave ; Workplace absenteeism</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-08, Vol.31 (4), p.249-257</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-4018019b297dd9c7180c4cfce1f030dda429656473698d1bb3385fba8873fcaf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40967500$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40967500$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17047539$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16161707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hlobil, Hynek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staal, J Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoelstra, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariëns, Geertje AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smid, Tjabe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Mechelen, Willem</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain</title><title>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</title><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><description>The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after &gt; 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is.</description><subject>Back pain</subject><subject>Behavior Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Diseases of the spine</subject><subject>Ergonomics</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Health care outcome assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - psychology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Psychoeducational intervention</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</subject><subject>Rehabilitation, Vocational - psychology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Sick Leave</subject><subject>Workplace absenteeism</subject><issn>0355-3140</issn><issn>1795-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFqGzEQhkVpaBy3hz5Awl4ayGHT0UpaScdg0sRgSCAJ9Ca0WonKWa9SSVvTt48cmwaKDqOf-ZiBbxD6iuGSNRx_T-ut_XUpBHxAM8wlq6WEnx_RDAhjNcEUjtFJSmuARhb-EzrGbXkc-Awtr52zJvs_drQpVcFVuoo2T3Gsc6i3IT5XyzHbWPrZh7FyIVYPU6fNlG01hG1dvs_VvfbjZ3Tk9JDsl0Odo6cf14-L23p1d7NcXK1qTSXkmgIWgGXXSN730vCSDDXOWOyAQN9r2siWtZSTVooedx0hgrlOC8GJM9qROTrfz32J4fdkU1Ybn4wdBj3aMCXVCsYF4VDAiz1oYkgpWqdeot_o-FdhUDtv6s2bKt4Ke3YYOnUb27-TB1EF-HYAdDJ6cFGPxqd3jgPljMjCne65dcoh_utTkC1nsFt0u-9rH332ah2K6qJL7W61O5VqABjwUjBgjKGk_wOVqmGcvAIDjJLf</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Hlobil, Hynek</creator><creator>Staal, J Bart</creator><creator>Spoelstra, Maaike</creator><creator>Ariëns, Geertje AM</creator><creator>Smid, Tjabe</creator><creator>van Mechelen, Willem</creator><general>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</general><general>National Institute for Working Life</general><general>Finnish Institute of Occupational Health</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Denmark)</general><general>National Institute of Occupational Health (Norway)</general><general>Scandinavian journal of work, environment &amp; health</general><scope>188</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain</title><author>Hlobil, Hynek ; Staal, J Bart ; Spoelstra, Maaike ; Ariëns, Geertje AM ; Smid, Tjabe ; van Mechelen, Willem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-4018019b297dd9c7180c4cfce1f030dda429656473698d1bb3385fba8873fcaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Back pain</topic><topic>Behavior Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Diseases of the spine</topic><topic>Ergonomics</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Health care outcome assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - psychology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Psychoeducational intervention</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods</topic><topic>Rehabilitation, Vocational - psychology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Sick Leave</topic><topic>Workplace absenteeism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hlobil, Hynek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Staal, J Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spoelstra, Maaike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariëns, Geertje AM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smid, Tjabe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Mechelen, Willem</creatorcontrib><collection>Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hlobil, Hynek</au><au>Staal, J Bart</au><au>Spoelstra, Maaike</au><au>Ariëns, Geertje AM</au><au>Smid, Tjabe</au><au>van Mechelen, Willem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Work Environ Health</addtitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>257</epage><pages>249-257</pages><issn>0355-3140</issn><eissn>1795-990X</eissn><abstract>The effectiveness of return-to-work intervention for subacute low-back pain on work absenteeism, pain severity, and functional status was examined by means of a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Publications in English that met the selection criteria were identified in a computer-aided search and assessed for methodological quality. A best-evidence synthesis was performed instead of statistical data pooling, because of the heterogeneity of the interventions and study populations. Five of nine studies comparing return-to-work intervention with usual care were identified as methodologically high-quality studies. Strong evidence was found for the effectiveness of return to work intervention on the return-to-work rate after 6 months and for the effectiveness of return-to-work intervention on the reduction of days of absence from work after &gt; 12 months. It can be concluded that return-to-work interventions are equal or more effective regarding absence from work due to subacute low-back pain than usual care is.</abstract><cop>Helsinki</cop><pub>Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health</pub><pmid>16161707</pmid><doi>10.5271/sjweh.880</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0355-3140
ispartof Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 2005-08, Vol.31 (4), p.249-257
issn 0355-3140
1795-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68578370
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Back pain
Behavior Therapy - methods
Biological and medical sciences
Control groups
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Diseases of the spine
Ergonomics
Experimentation
Health care outcome assessment
Humans
Low back pain
Low Back Pain - psychology
Low Back Pain - rehabilitation
Medical sciences
Pain
Patient Education as Topic
Psychoeducational intervention
Randomized controlled trials
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Rehabilitation, Vocational - methods
Rehabilitation, Vocational - psychology
Review
Severity of Illness Index
Sick Leave
Workplace absenteeism
title Effectiveness of a return-to-work Intervention for Subacute low-back Pain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A20%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20a%20return-to-work%20Intervention%20for%20Subacute%20low-back%20Pain&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20Journal%20of%20Work,%20Environment%20%EF%BC%86%20Health&rft.au=Hlobil,%20Hynek&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=257&rft.pages=249-257&rft.issn=0355-3140&rft.eissn=1795-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5271/sjweh.880&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40967500%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a490t-4018019b297dd9c7180c4cfce1f030dda429656473698d1bb3385fba8873fcaf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68578370&rft_id=info:pmid/16161707&rft_airiti_id=03553140_200507_201011100057_201011100057_249_257&rft_jstor_id=40967500&rfr_iscdi=true