Loading…

Emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery for acute coronary syndrome : Beating heart versus conventional cardioplegic cardiac arrest strategies

Aim of this study was to compare the outcome of beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) strategies in acute coronary syndromes for emergency indications. 638 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving emergency CABG surgery via midline sternotomy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2006-07, Vol.114 (1), p.I477-I485
Main Authors: RASTAN, Ardawan Julian, ECKENSTEIN, Judith Isabell, HENTSCHEL, Bettina, FUNKAT, Anne Kathrin, GUMMERT, Jan Fritz, DOLL, Nicolas, WALTHER, Thomas, FALK, Volkmar, MOHR, Friedrich Wilhelm
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim of this study was to compare the outcome of beating heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) strategies in acute coronary syndromes for emergency indications. 638 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) receiving emergency CABG surgery via midline sternotomy from January 2000 to September 2005 were evaluated. Propensity score analysis was used to predict the probability of undergoing beating heart (BH) (n=240) versus cardioplegic cardiac arrest (CA) (n=398) strategies. Patients presented with stable hemodynamics (n=531) or in cardiogenic shock (CS) (n=107). Hospital and follow-up outcome was compared by propensity score adjusted multiregression analysis. BH included 116 on-pump and 124 off-pump (OPCAB) procedures. There was a propensity to operate CS patients on the beating heart (multivariate odds ratio [OR], 3.8; P=0.001). Under stable hemodynamics significant predictors for BH selection were logEuroSCORE >20% (OR, 2.05), creatinine >1.8 mg/dL (OR, 4.12), complicated percutaneous coronary intervention (OR, 1.88), ejection fraction
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.001545