Loading…
Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape
Two types of trap, the BT Trap and PC(TM) pitfall cone trap, were evaluated against the most widely used method of sampling and sieving for their ability to detect low numbers of storage mites (Acarus siro, Tyrophagus longior and Lepidoglyphus destructor) in bulk oilseed rape, under UK maritime cond...
Saved in:
Published in: | Experimental & applied acarology 2005-10, Vol.37 (1-2), p.131-140 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3 |
container_end_page | 140 |
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Experimental & applied acarology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Dunn, J.A Prickett, A.J Thind, B.B |
description | Two types of trap, the BT Trap and PC(TM) pitfall cone trap, were evaluated against the most widely used method of sampling and sieving for their ability to detect low numbers of storage mites (Acarus siro, Tyrophagus longior and Lepidoglyphus destructor) in bulk oilseed rape, under UK maritime conditions. In addition, a synthetic lure (2-nonanone) was incorporated into the two types of trap to assess whether its presence improved trapping performance. The BT traps and PC traps were significantly more effective in detecting low numbers of mites of all species compared with sampling and sieving. The PC trap with synthetic lure was the most effective method. As the PC trap is already widely used for monitoring insects in cereal bulks in the UK, extending its application to include oilseed rape, and to detect mites, would be a logical and cost effective extension of its use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10493-005-0360-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68619891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68619891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgei28AO4gIVUboEZJ7bjY1XxJVXiAD1bjjPZeknixU4O_fc42pUqceFk2XresUYvY28QPiKA_pQRGlNXALKCWkEln7EdSi0qo0E8ZztA1VYtKnHBLnM-QIGg5Et2gQrbMsDs2OEmZ8p5onnhceBTnMMSU5j3fKLlIfaZDzFxcml85D0t5JcQ500uD4mI5yP5QHl7yCXn9sSnsBAPM-_W8TePYcxEPU_uSK_Yi8GV6-vzecXuv3z-dfutuvvx9fvtzV3lG8Slcn0nXdM708pOEACi9kJq4zowXhNK713fw-AG1eih9h1KM4ASQtZN09WuvmIfTnOPKf5ZKS92CtnTOLqZ4pqtahWa1uB_IWo0Dba6wPf_wENc01yWsOVbKYxumoLwhHyKOSca7DGFyaVHi2C3uuypLltasFtdVpbM2_PgtZuof0qc-yng-gxc9m4ckpt9yE9OCxRCbe7dyQ0uWrdPxdz_FIA1IKhaQ13_BeSbppM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225529744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dunn, J.A ; Prickett, A.J ; Thind, B.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Dunn, J.A ; Prickett, A.J ; Thind, B.B</creatorcontrib><description>Two types of trap, the BT Trap and PC(TM) pitfall cone trap, were evaluated against the most widely used method of sampling and sieving for their ability to detect low numbers of storage mites (Acarus siro, Tyrophagus longior and Lepidoglyphus destructor) in bulk oilseed rape, under UK maritime conditions. In addition, a synthetic lure (2-nonanone) was incorporated into the two types of trap to assess whether its presence improved trapping performance. The BT traps and PC traps were significantly more effective in detecting low numbers of mites of all species compared with sampling and sieving. The PC trap with synthetic lure was the most effective method. As the PC trap is already widely used for monitoring insects in cereal bulks in the UK, extending its application to include oilseed rape, and to detect mites, would be a logical and cost effective extension of its use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10493-005-0360-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16180079</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EAACEM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>2-nonanone ; Acaridae ; Acaridae - growth & development ; Acarus siro ; Animals ; baits ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brassica napus - parasitology ; Brassica napus var. napus ; detection ; equipment performance ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrates ; Ketones ; Lepidoglyphus destructor ; Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control ; Mite Infestations - prevention & control ; Mites ; Monitoring methods ; pest monitoring ; Pests of stored products ; rapeseed ; storage mites ; trapping ; traps ; Tyrophagus longior ; volatile compounds</subject><ispartof>Experimental & applied acarology, 2005-10, Vol.37 (1-2), p.131-140</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27898,27899</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17212269$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16180079$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dunn, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prickett, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thind, B.B</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape</title><title>Experimental & applied acarology</title><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><description>Two types of trap, the BT Trap and PC(TM) pitfall cone trap, were evaluated against the most widely used method of sampling and sieving for their ability to detect low numbers of storage mites (Acarus siro, Tyrophagus longior and Lepidoglyphus destructor) in bulk oilseed rape, under UK maritime conditions. In addition, a synthetic lure (2-nonanone) was incorporated into the two types of trap to assess whether its presence improved trapping performance. The BT traps and PC traps were significantly more effective in detecting low numbers of mites of all species compared with sampling and sieving. The PC trap with synthetic lure was the most effective method. As the PC trap is already widely used for monitoring insects in cereal bulks in the UK, extending its application to include oilseed rape, and to detect mites, would be a logical and cost effective extension of its use.</description><subject>2-nonanone</subject><subject>Acaridae</subject><subject>Acaridae - growth & development</subject><subject>Acarus siro</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>baits</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brassica napus - parasitology</subject><subject>Brassica napus var. napus</subject><subject>detection</subject><subject>equipment performance</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Ketones</subject><subject>Lepidoglyphus destructor</subject><subject>Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control</subject><subject>Mite Infestations - prevention & control</subject><subject>Mites</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>pest monitoring</subject><subject>Pests of stored products</subject><subject>rapeseed</subject><subject>storage mites</subject><subject>trapping</subject><subject>traps</subject><subject>Tyrophagus longior</subject><subject>volatile compounds</subject><issn>0168-8162</issn><issn>1572-9702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1v1DAQBmALgei28AO4gIVUboEZJ7bjY1XxJVXiAD1bjjPZeknixU4O_fc42pUqceFk2XresUYvY28QPiKA_pQRGlNXALKCWkEln7EdSi0qo0E8ZztA1VYtKnHBLnM-QIGg5Et2gQrbMsDs2OEmZ8p5onnhceBTnMMSU5j3fKLlIfaZDzFxcml85D0t5JcQ500uD4mI5yP5QHl7yCXn9sSnsBAPM-_W8TePYcxEPU_uSK_Yi8GV6-vzecXuv3z-dfutuvvx9fvtzV3lG8Slcn0nXdM708pOEACi9kJq4zowXhNK713fw-AG1eih9h1KM4ASQtZN09WuvmIfTnOPKf5ZKS92CtnTOLqZ4pqtahWa1uB_IWo0Dba6wPf_wENc01yWsOVbKYxumoLwhHyKOSca7DGFyaVHi2C3uuypLltasFtdVpbM2_PgtZuof0qc-yng-gxc9m4ckpt9yE9OCxRCbe7dyQ0uWrdPxdz_FIA1IKhaQ13_BeSbppM</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Dunn, J.A</creator><creator>Prickett, A.J</creator><creator>Thind, B.B</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape</title><author>Dunn, J.A ; Prickett, A.J ; Thind, B.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>2-nonanone</topic><topic>Acaridae</topic><topic>Acaridae - growth & development</topic><topic>Acarus siro</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>baits</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brassica napus - parasitology</topic><topic>Brassica napus var. napus</topic><topic>detection</topic><topic>equipment performance</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Ketones</topic><topic>Lepidoglyphus destructor</topic><topic>Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control</topic><topic>Mite Infestations - prevention & control</topic><topic>Mites</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>pest monitoring</topic><topic>Pests of stored products</topic><topic>rapeseed</topic><topic>storage mites</topic><topic>trapping</topic><topic>traps</topic><topic>Tyrophagus longior</topic><topic>volatile compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dunn, J.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prickett, A.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thind, B.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dunn, J.A</au><au>Prickett, A.J</au><au>Thind, B.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape</atitle><jtitle>Experimental & applied acarology</jtitle><addtitle>Exp Appl Acarol</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>131-140</pages><issn>0168-8162</issn><eissn>1572-9702</eissn><coden>EAACEM</coden><abstract>Two types of trap, the BT Trap and PC(TM) pitfall cone trap, were evaluated against the most widely used method of sampling and sieving for their ability to detect low numbers of storage mites (Acarus siro, Tyrophagus longior and Lepidoglyphus destructor) in bulk oilseed rape, under UK maritime conditions. In addition, a synthetic lure (2-nonanone) was incorporated into the two types of trap to assess whether its presence improved trapping performance. The BT traps and PC traps were significantly more effective in detecting low numbers of mites of all species compared with sampling and sieving. The PC trap with synthetic lure was the most effective method. As the PC trap is already widely used for monitoring insects in cereal bulks in the UK, extending its application to include oilseed rape, and to detect mites, would be a logical and cost effective extension of its use.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16180079</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10493-005-0360-5</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-8162 |
ispartof | Experimental & applied acarology, 2005-10, Vol.37 (1-2), p.131-140 |
issn | 0168-8162 1572-9702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68619891 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | 2-nonanone Acaridae Acaridae - growth & development Acarus siro Animals baits Biological and medical sciences Brassica napus - parasitology Brassica napus var. napus detection equipment performance Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Invertebrates Ketones Lepidoglyphus destructor Medically important nuisances and vectors, pests of stored products and materials: population survey and control Mite Infestations - prevention & control Mites Monitoring methods pest monitoring Pests of stored products rapeseed storage mites trapping traps Tyrophagus longior volatile compounds |
title | Assessment of monitoring methods for early detection of three species of storage mite in bulk oilseed rape |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-05T02%3A19%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20monitoring%20methods%20for%20early%20detection%20of%20three%20species%20of%20storage%20mite%20in%20bulk%20oilseed%20rape&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20&%20applied%20acarology&rft.au=Dunn,%20J.A&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=131-140&rft.issn=0168-8162&rft.eissn=1572-9702&rft.coden=EAACEM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10493-005-0360-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68619891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-adb5a4da985b2e00117c2579ab09c7e15ccadd0faf647f3cb159f06225344b3a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225529744&rft_id=info:pmid/16180079&rfr_iscdi=true |