Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements

Preserving both cruciate ligaments in unicondylar knee arthroplasty likely provides more normal knee mechanics and contributes to enhanced patient function. It follows that preserving both cruciate ligaments with total knee arthroplasty should provide functional benefit compared to arthroplasty sacr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005-10, Vol.13 (7), p.551-556
Main Authors: Banks, Scott A, Fregly, Benjamin J, Boniforti, Filippo, Reinschmidt, Christoph, Romagnoli, Sergio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Aged
Anterior Cruciate Ligament - surgery
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Biomechanical Phenomena
Female
Femur - anatomy & histology
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Joint surgery
Knee
Knee Joint - physiopathology
Knee Prosthesis
Ligaments
Male
Middle Aged
Range of Motion, Articular - physiology
Tibia - anatomy & histology
Weight-Bearing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Preserving both cruciate ligaments in unicondylar knee arthroplasty likely provides more normal knee mechanics and contributes to enhanced patient function. It follows that preserving both cruciate ligaments with total knee arthroplasty should provide functional benefit compared to arthroplasty sacrificing one or both cruciates. The purpose of this study was to compare knee kinematics in patients with optimally functioning cruciate-preserving medial unicondylar and bi-unicondylar arthroplasty to determine if knee motions differed. Eight consenting patients with seven medial unicondylar and five bi-unicondylar arthroplasties were studied using lateral fluoroscopy during treadmill gait, stair stepping, and maximum flexion activities. Patient-specific geometric models based on CT and CAD data were used for shape matching to determine the three-dimensional knee kinematics. Tibiofemoral contact locations were computed for the replaced compartments. Maximum flexion in kneeling was 135 degrees +/-14 degrees for unicondylar knees and 123 degrees +/-14 degrees for bi-unicondylar knees (p=0.22). For 0 degrees -30 degrees flexion during the stair activity, the medial condyle translated posterior 3.5+/-2.5 mm in unicondylar knees and 4.7+/-1.9 mm in bi-unicondylar knees (p>0.05). Lateral posterior translation was 5.0+/-2.3 mm in bi-unicondylar knees for 0 degrees -30 degrees flexion. From heel-strike to mid-stance phase, there was little tibial rotation, but unicondylar knees showed 1.5+/-1.6 mm posterior translation of the medial condyle, while bi-unicondylar knees showed 5.1+/-2.2 mm (p
ISSN:0942-2056
1433-7347
DOI:10.1007/s00167-004-0565-x