Finite element simulation of early creep and wear in total hip arthroplasty

• Published in: Journal of biomechanics 2005-12, Vol.38 (12), p.2365-2374
• Main Authors: Bevill, Scott L., Bevill, Grant R., Penmetsa, Janaki R., Petrella, Anthony J., Rullkoetter, Paul J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - adverse effects; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - instrumentation; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - methods; Biocompatible Materials - analysis; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Computer Simulation; Creep; Elasticity; Equipment Failure Analysis - methods; Finite Element Analysis; Hip joint; Hip Joint - physiopathology; Humans; Joint Instability - etiology; Joint Instability - physiopathology; Joint surgery; Materials Testing; Models, Biological; Penetration; Physical Stimulation - methods; Polyethylene - analysis; Polyethylene - chemistry; Polyethylene wear; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Stress, Mechanical; Studies; THR; Viscosity; Wear simulation; Weight-Bearing
• ISSN: 0021-9290; 1873-2380
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.10.022

Polyethylene wear particulate has been implicated in osteolytic lesion development and may lead to implant loosening and revision surgery. Wear in total hip arthroplasty is frequently estimated from patient radiographs by measurement of penetration of the femoral head into the polyethylene liner. Penetration, however, is multi-factorial, and includes components of wear and deformation due to creep. From a clinical perspective, it is of great interest to separate these elements to better evaluate true wear rates in vivo. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine polyethylene creep and wear penetration and volumetric wear during simulated gait loading conditions for variables of head size, liner thickness, and head–liner clearance. A finite element model of hip replacement articulation was developed, and creep and wear simulation was performed to 1 million gait cycles. Creep of the liner occurred quickly and increased the predicted contact areas by up to 56%, subsequently reducing contact pressures by up to 41%. Greater creep penetration was found with smaller heads, thicker liners, and larger clearance. The least volumetric wear but the most linear penetration was found with the smallest head size. Although polyethylene thickness increases from 4 to 16 mm produced only slight increases in volumetric wear and modest effects on total penetration, the fraction of creep in total penetration varied with thickness from 10% to over 50%. With thicker liners and smaller heads, creep will comprise a significant fraction of early penetration. These results will aid an understanding of the complex interaction of creep and wear.