Loading…
Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Children With Low Urinary Tract Abnormality
Patients with end-stage renal disease and lower urinary tract abnormality are often considered high risk for renal transplantation. To examine the degree of risk, we studied patients who received renal transplants between 1985 and 2003. Forty eight patients had congenital lower urinary tract anomali...
Saved in:
Published in: | Transplantation proceedings 2005-09, Vol.37 (7), p.3071-3074 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Patients with end-stage renal disease and lower urinary tract abnormality are often considered high risk for renal transplantation.
To examine the degree of risk, we studied patients who received renal transplants between 1985 and 2003. Forty eight patients had congenital lower urinary tract anomalies and 168 patients comprised a control group without these anomalies.
Mean age and distribution of sex were not significantly different between the case and the control group. Among patients with anomalies, 8% had delayed graft function; 75%, acute rejection; and 39.5%, chronic rejection. Among the controls 2.3% had delayed graft function; 59%, acute rejection; and 35%, chronic rejection. None of these differences was significant. Mean survival time was 6 years in affected patients and 7.3 years in the control group (
P = .7). Among patients with anomalies the rate of graft survival in the first year after transplantation was 90%; and those in the third, fifth, and seventh years, 76%, 65%, and 40%, respectively. For the controls, the graft survivals were 88% at 1 year; 73% at 3 years; 70% at 5 years; and 49% at 7 years after transplantation.
This study showed that a history of lower urinary tract anomalies had no effect on graft function. Graft survival was not different among these patients compared with patients free of these anomalies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.08.026 |