Loading…

Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility

To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis. The results of the two types of observer performance tests described abov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2005-11, Vol.34 (6), p.350-352
Main Authors: Yoshiura, K, Okamura, K, Tokumori, K, Nakayama, E, Chikui, T, Goto, T K, Shimizu, M, Kawazu, T
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673
container_end_page 352
container_issue 6
container_start_page 350
container_title Dento-maxillo-facial radiology
container_volume 34
creator Yoshiura, K
Okamura, K
Tokumori, K
Nakayama, E
Chikui, T
Goto, T K
Shimizu, M
Kawazu, T
description To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis. The results of the two types of observer performance tests described above were retrieved from previous studies. Recording media included in those studies were the Compuray and the Dixel, direct digital radiographic systems, and Ektaspeed Plus film. The average numbers of perceptibility of image details from five observers were calculated for each step and for every combination of contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom from the perceptibility test. The average diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries from the same five observers was correlated with the total number of perceptible details from the phantom using regression analysis. Finally, attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis was calculated from the attenuation range of the phantom where the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained. Maximum correlation (r=0.68) was obtained at the combination of five contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom. Attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis corresponded to the 2 mm to 6 mm thickness of aluminium with acrylic block of 12 mm thickness. There is a correlation between perceptibility of low contrast image details and diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries. There may be a possibility to simplify observer performance tests for proximal caries diagnosis by using the standardized phantom simulating its attenuation range.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/dmfr/13550415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68692491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68692491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0DtLA0EYheFBFBOjpa1sZbdm7jNrJ8EbBGwU0i1z-UZG9ubMLpJ_b0IiVqd5OMWL0DXBd4SKaunbkJaECYE5ESdoTriSpeB0c4rmmApcakY3M3SR8xfGmDMhz9GMSEoVV2qO7ld9StCYMfZdYWH8AegKH81n1-cxusI4NyXjtoXpfDFAcjCM0cYmjttLdBZMk-HquAv08fT4vnop12_Pr6uHdemYUGPJWGWpBQ-aehssc44F5axkWBsdFKkEFVppEMRpw4gEEkDZynthgHup2ALdHn6H1H9PkMe6jdlB05gO-inXUsuK8orsYHmALvU5Jwj1kGJr0rYmuN7Hqvex6r9YO39zPJ5sC_5fH-uwX4EUZs8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68692491</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Yoshiura, K ; Okamura, K ; Tokumori, K ; Nakayama, E ; Chikui, T ; Goto, T K ; Shimizu, M ; Kawazu, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshiura, K ; Okamura, K ; Tokumori, K ; Nakayama, E ; Chikui, T ; Goto, T K ; Shimizu, M ; Kawazu, T</creatorcontrib><description>To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis. The results of the two types of observer performance tests described above were retrieved from previous studies. Recording media included in those studies were the Compuray and the Dixel, direct digital radiographic systems, and Ektaspeed Plus film. The average numbers of perceptibility of image details from five observers were calculated for each step and for every combination of contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom from the perceptibility test. The average diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries from the same five observers was correlated with the total number of perceptible details from the phantom using regression analysis. Finally, attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis was calculated from the attenuation range of the phantom where the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained. Maximum correlation (r=0.68) was obtained at the combination of five contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom. Attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis corresponded to the 2 mm to 6 mm thickness of aluminium with acrylic block of 12 mm thickness. There is a correlation between perceptibility of low contrast image details and diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries. There may be a possibility to simplify observer performance tests for proximal caries diagnosis by using the standardized phantom simulating its attenuation range.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/13550415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16227477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Analysis of Variance ; Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Molar, Third - diagnostic imaging ; Radiography, Dental, Digital ; Regression Analysis ; ROC Curve ; X-Ray Film</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2005-11, Vol.34 (6), p.350-352</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16227477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokumori, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikui, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, T K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawazu, T</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis. The results of the two types of observer performance tests described above were retrieved from previous studies. Recording media included in those studies were the Compuray and the Dixel, direct digital radiographic systems, and Ektaspeed Plus film. The average numbers of perceptibility of image details from five observers were calculated for each step and for every combination of contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom from the perceptibility test. The average diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries from the same five observers was correlated with the total number of perceptible details from the phantom using regression analysis. Finally, attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis was calculated from the attenuation range of the phantom where the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained. Maximum correlation (r=0.68) was obtained at the combination of five contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom. Attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis corresponded to the 2 mm to 6 mm thickness of aluminium with acrylic block of 12 mm thickness. There is a correlation between perceptibility of low contrast image details and diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries. There may be a possibility to simplify observer performance tests for proximal caries diagnosis by using the standardized phantom simulating its attenuation range.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molar, Third - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental, Digital</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>X-Ray Film</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0DtLA0EYheFBFBOjpa1sZbdm7jNrJ8EbBGwU0i1z-UZG9ubMLpJ_b0IiVqd5OMWL0DXBd4SKaunbkJaECYE5ESdoTriSpeB0c4rmmApcakY3M3SR8xfGmDMhz9GMSEoVV2qO7ld9StCYMfZdYWH8AegKH81n1-cxusI4NyXjtoXpfDFAcjCM0cYmjttLdBZMk-HquAv08fT4vnop12_Pr6uHdemYUGPJWGWpBQ-aehssc44F5axkWBsdFKkEFVppEMRpw4gEEkDZynthgHup2ALdHn6H1H9PkMe6jdlB05gO-inXUsuK8orsYHmALvU5Jwj1kGJr0rYmuN7Hqvex6r9YO39zPJ5sC_5fH-uwX4EUZs8</recordid><startdate>200511</startdate><enddate>200511</enddate><creator>Yoshiura, K</creator><creator>Okamura, K</creator><creator>Tokumori, K</creator><creator>Nakayama, E</creator><creator>Chikui, T</creator><creator>Goto, T K</creator><creator>Shimizu, M</creator><creator>Kawazu, T</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200511</creationdate><title>Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility</title><author>Yoshiura, K ; Okamura, K ; Tokumori, K ; Nakayama, E ; Chikui, T ; Goto, T K ; Shimizu, M ; Kawazu, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molar, Third - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental, Digital</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>X-Ray Film</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshiura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okamura, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokumori, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakayama, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chikui, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, T K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimizu, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawazu, T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshiura, K</au><au>Okamura, K</au><au>Tokumori, K</au><au>Nakayama, E</au><au>Chikui, T</au><au>Goto, T K</au><au>Shimizu, M</au><au>Kawazu, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2005-11</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>350-352</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>To correlate diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries with perceptibility of low contrast image details using regression analysis. The other purpose was to determine the attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis. The results of the two types of observer performance tests described above were retrieved from previous studies. Recording media included in those studies were the Compuray and the Dixel, direct digital radiographic systems, and Ektaspeed Plus film. The average numbers of perceptibility of image details from five observers were calculated for each step and for every combination of contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom from the perceptibility test. The average diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries from the same five observers was correlated with the total number of perceptible details from the phantom using regression analysis. Finally, attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis was calculated from the attenuation range of the phantom where the maximum correlation coefficient was obtained. Maximum correlation (r=0.68) was obtained at the combination of five contiguous steps of the aluminium test phantom. Attenuation range required for proximal caries diagnosis corresponded to the 2 mm to 6 mm thickness of aluminium with acrylic block of 12 mm thickness. There is a correlation between perceptibility of low contrast image details and diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries. There may be a possibility to simplify observer performance tests for proximal caries diagnosis by using the standardized phantom simulating its attenuation range.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>16227477</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr/13550415</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0250-832X
ispartof Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2005-11, Vol.34 (6), p.350-352
issn 0250-832X
1476-542X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68692491
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adolescent
Analysis of Variance
Dental Caries - diagnostic imaging
Dentistry
Humans
Molar, Third - diagnostic imaging
Radiography, Dental, Digital
Regression Analysis
ROC Curve
X-Ray Film
title Correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceptibility
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20diagnostic%20accuracy%20and%20perceptibility&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=Yoshiura,%20K&rft.date=2005-11&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=350-352&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr/13550415&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68692491%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-339b2bede82dbfb3cc3f7cb6308a8f719525878e51c8a316e1fe7b9dd5ae4d673%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68692491&rft_id=info:pmid/16227477&rfr_iscdi=true