Loading…
Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces
Biomacromolecules like gelatin and chitosan have emerged as highly versatile biomimetic coatings for applications in tissue engineering. The elucidation of the interfacial kinetics of cell adhesion on biomacromolecular surfaces will pave the way for the rational design of chitosan/gelatin‐based syst...
Saved in:
Published in: | Macromolecular bioscience 2005-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1022-1031 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3 |
container_end_page | 1031 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1022 |
container_title | Macromolecular bioscience |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Fang, Ning Zhu, Aiping Chan-Park, Mary B. Chan, Vincent |
description | Biomacromolecules like gelatin and chitosan have emerged as highly versatile biomimetic coatings for applications in tissue engineering. The elucidation of the interfacial kinetics of cell adhesion on biomacromolecular surfaces will pave the way for the rational design of chitosan/gelatin‐based systems for cell regeneration. Biomacromolecular ultra‐thin films, chemically immobilized on fused silica are ideal experimental models for determining the effect of surface properties on the biophysical cascades following cell seeding. In this study, confocal reflectance interference contrast microscopy (C‐RICM), in conjunction with phase contrast microscopy and fluorescence confocal microscopy, was applied to detect the adhesion contact dynamics of 3T3 fibroblasts on chitosan and gelatin ultrathin films. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the immobilization of chitosan or gelatin on the silanized glass surface. Both the initial cell deformation rate and the change of two‐dimensional spread area of the 3T3 fibroblasts are higher on gelatin‐modified surfaces than on chitosan surfaces. The steady‐state adhesion energy of 3T3 fibroblasts on gelatin film is three times higher than that on chitosan film. Immuno‐staining of actin further demonstrates the different organization of cytoskeleton, likely induced by the change in cell signaling mechanism on the two biomacromolecular surfaces. The better attachment of 3T3 fibroblast to gelatin is postulated to be caused by the presence of adhesive domains on gelatin.
C‐RICM images of a typical 3T3 cell on a gelatin‐immobilized substrate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mabi.200500123 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68717400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68717400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1P3DAQBmALUQGlXDlWucAtW39_HJdtF5CgSNCqR2vWcVRDElM7Ed1_X6NdLb1x8lh6ZsZ-EToleEYwpl96WIUZxVhgTCjbQ0dEElkLYsT-rtbqEH3M-bEQpQ09QIdEUqylJkdoOW9--xziUC3iMIIbq6_rAfrgchXbahlWKa46yGO5DtVFiD24FPvYeTd1kKqHKbXgfP6EPrTQZX-yPY_Rz-W3H4ur-ubu8noxv6kd55TVIB1tyl7aYNPqUmnSagwGZNMwwbjgTFDhuTGae09YIz1vBDe-pZo64dgxOt_MfU7xz-TzaPuQne86GHycspVaEcUxfhcSwxknghY428Dyr5yTb-1zCj2ktSXYvkZsXyO2u4hLw-ft5GnV--aNbzMt4GwLIDvo2gSDC_nNKaINxqo4s3EvofPrd9ba2_nF9f-PqDe9IY_-764X0pOViilhf32_tPdXD7fSqKWl7B9jtqKu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19434152</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Fang, Ning ; Zhu, Aiping ; Chan-Park, Mary B. ; Chan, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Fang, Ning ; Zhu, Aiping ; Chan-Park, Mary B. ; Chan, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Biomacromolecules like gelatin and chitosan have emerged as highly versatile biomimetic coatings for applications in tissue engineering. The elucidation of the interfacial kinetics of cell adhesion on biomacromolecular surfaces will pave the way for the rational design of chitosan/gelatin‐based systems for cell regeneration. Biomacromolecular ultra‐thin films, chemically immobilized on fused silica are ideal experimental models for determining the effect of surface properties on the biophysical cascades following cell seeding. In this study, confocal reflectance interference contrast microscopy (C‐RICM), in conjunction with phase contrast microscopy and fluorescence confocal microscopy, was applied to detect the adhesion contact dynamics of 3T3 fibroblasts on chitosan and gelatin ultrathin films. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the immobilization of chitosan or gelatin on the silanized glass surface. Both the initial cell deformation rate and the change of two‐dimensional spread area of the 3T3 fibroblasts are higher on gelatin‐modified surfaces than on chitosan surfaces. The steady‐state adhesion energy of 3T3 fibroblasts on gelatin film is three times higher than that on chitosan film. Immuno‐staining of actin further demonstrates the different organization of cytoskeleton, likely induced by the change in cell signaling mechanism on the two biomacromolecular surfaces. The better attachment of 3T3 fibroblast to gelatin is postulated to be caused by the presence of adhesive domains on gelatin.
C‐RICM images of a typical 3T3 cell on a gelatin‐immobilized substrate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1616-5187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-5195</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mabi.200500123</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16208681</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>3T3 Cells ; Actins - metabolism ; adhesion dynamics ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry ; biophysics ; Cell Adhesion ; Chitosan - chemistry ; Coated Materials, Biocompatible ; cytoskeleton ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fibroblasts - metabolism ; Gelatin - chemistry ; Gelatin - ultrastructure ; Immunohistochemistry ; Kinetics ; Macromolecular Substances ; Mice ; Microscopy, Atomic Force ; Microscopy, Confocal ; Microscopy, Interference ; Natural polymers ; Physicochemistry of polymers ; polymer ; Proteins ; Silicon Dioxide - chemistry ; Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission ; Starch and polysaccharides ; Substrate Specificity ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Macromolecular bioscience, 2005-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1022-1031</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17189007$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16208681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Aiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan-Park, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces</title><title>Macromolecular bioscience</title><addtitle>Macromol. Biosci</addtitle><description>Biomacromolecules like gelatin and chitosan have emerged as highly versatile biomimetic coatings for applications in tissue engineering. The elucidation of the interfacial kinetics of cell adhesion on biomacromolecular surfaces will pave the way for the rational design of chitosan/gelatin‐based systems for cell regeneration. Biomacromolecular ultra‐thin films, chemically immobilized on fused silica are ideal experimental models for determining the effect of surface properties on the biophysical cascades following cell seeding. In this study, confocal reflectance interference contrast microscopy (C‐RICM), in conjunction with phase contrast microscopy and fluorescence confocal microscopy, was applied to detect the adhesion contact dynamics of 3T3 fibroblasts on chitosan and gelatin ultrathin films. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the immobilization of chitosan or gelatin on the silanized glass surface. Both the initial cell deformation rate and the change of two‐dimensional spread area of the 3T3 fibroblasts are higher on gelatin‐modified surfaces than on chitosan surfaces. The steady‐state adhesion energy of 3T3 fibroblasts on gelatin film is three times higher than that on chitosan film. Immuno‐staining of actin further demonstrates the different organization of cytoskeleton, likely induced by the change in cell signaling mechanism on the two biomacromolecular surfaces. The better attachment of 3T3 fibroblast to gelatin is postulated to be caused by the presence of adhesive domains on gelatin.
C‐RICM images of a typical 3T3 cell on a gelatin‐immobilized substrate.</description><subject>3T3 Cells</subject><subject>Actins - metabolism</subject><subject>adhesion dynamics</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</subject><subject>biophysics</subject><subject>Cell Adhesion</subject><subject>Chitosan - chemistry</subject><subject>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</subject><subject>cytoskeleton</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fibroblasts - metabolism</subject><subject>Gelatin - chemistry</subject><subject>Gelatin - ultrastructure</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Macromolecular Substances</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Microscopy, Atomic Force</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal</subject><subject>Microscopy, Interference</subject><subject>Natural polymers</subject><subject>Physicochemistry of polymers</subject><subject>polymer</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission</subject><subject>Starch and polysaccharides</subject><subject>Substrate Specificity</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>1616-5187</issn><issn>1616-5195</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1P3DAQBmALUQGlXDlWucAtW39_HJdtF5CgSNCqR2vWcVRDElM7Ed1_X6NdLb1x8lh6ZsZ-EToleEYwpl96WIUZxVhgTCjbQ0dEElkLYsT-rtbqEH3M-bEQpQ09QIdEUqylJkdoOW9--xziUC3iMIIbq6_rAfrgchXbahlWKa46yGO5DtVFiD24FPvYeTd1kKqHKbXgfP6EPrTQZX-yPY_Rz-W3H4ur-ubu8noxv6kd55TVIB1tyl7aYNPqUmnSagwGZNMwwbjgTFDhuTGae09YIz1vBDe-pZo64dgxOt_MfU7xz-TzaPuQne86GHycspVaEcUxfhcSwxknghY428Dyr5yTb-1zCj2ktSXYvkZsXyO2u4hLw-ft5GnV--aNbzMt4GwLIDvo2gSDC_nNKaINxqo4s3EvofPrd9ba2_nF9f-PqDe9IY_-764X0pOViilhf32_tPdXD7fSqKWl7B9jtqKu</recordid><startdate>20051020</startdate><enddate>20051020</enddate><creator>Fang, Ning</creator><creator>Zhu, Aiping</creator><creator>Chan-Park, Mary B.</creator><creator>Chan, Vincent</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley-VCH</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051020</creationdate><title>Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces</title><author>Fang, Ning ; Zhu, Aiping ; Chan-Park, Mary B. ; Chan, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>3T3 Cells</topic><topic>Actins - metabolism</topic><topic>adhesion dynamics</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - chemistry</topic><topic>biophysics</topic><topic>Cell Adhesion</topic><topic>Chitosan - chemistry</topic><topic>Coated Materials, Biocompatible</topic><topic>cytoskeleton</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fibroblasts - metabolism</topic><topic>Gelatin - chemistry</topic><topic>Gelatin - ultrastructure</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Macromolecular Substances</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Microscopy, Atomic Force</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal</topic><topic>Microscopy, Interference</topic><topic>Natural polymers</topic><topic>Physicochemistry of polymers</topic><topic>polymer</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Silicon Dioxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission</topic><topic>Starch and polysaccharides</topic><topic>Substrate Specificity</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fang, Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Aiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan-Park, Mary B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Macromolecular bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fang, Ning</au><au>Zhu, Aiping</au><au>Chan-Park, Mary B.</au><au>Chan, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces</atitle><jtitle>Macromolecular bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>Macromol. Biosci</addtitle><date>2005-10-20</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1022</spage><epage>1031</epage><pages>1022-1031</pages><issn>1616-5187</issn><eissn>1616-5195</eissn><abstract>Biomacromolecules like gelatin and chitosan have emerged as highly versatile biomimetic coatings for applications in tissue engineering. The elucidation of the interfacial kinetics of cell adhesion on biomacromolecular surfaces will pave the way for the rational design of chitosan/gelatin‐based systems for cell regeneration. Biomacromolecular ultra‐thin films, chemically immobilized on fused silica are ideal experimental models for determining the effect of surface properties on the biophysical cascades following cell seeding. In this study, confocal reflectance interference contrast microscopy (C‐RICM), in conjunction with phase contrast microscopy and fluorescence confocal microscopy, was applied to detect the adhesion contact dynamics of 3T3 fibroblasts on chitosan and gelatin ultrathin films. X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the immobilization of chitosan or gelatin on the silanized glass surface. Both the initial cell deformation rate and the change of two‐dimensional spread area of the 3T3 fibroblasts are higher on gelatin‐modified surfaces than on chitosan surfaces. The steady‐state adhesion energy of 3T3 fibroblasts on gelatin film is three times higher than that on chitosan film. Immuno‐staining of actin further demonstrates the different organization of cytoskeleton, likely induced by the change in cell signaling mechanism on the two biomacromolecular surfaces. The better attachment of 3T3 fibroblast to gelatin is postulated to be caused by the presence of adhesive domains on gelatin.
C‐RICM images of a typical 3T3 cell on a gelatin‐immobilized substrate.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>16208681</pmid><doi>10.1002/mabi.200500123</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1616-5187 |
ispartof | Macromolecular bioscience, 2005-10, Vol.5 (10), p.1022-1031 |
issn | 1616-5187 1616-5195 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68717400 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | 3T3 Cells Actins - metabolism adhesion dynamics Animals Applied sciences Biocompatible Materials - chemistry biophysics Cell Adhesion Chitosan - chemistry Coated Materials, Biocompatible cytoskeleton Exact sciences and technology Fibroblasts - metabolism Gelatin - chemistry Gelatin - ultrastructure Immunohistochemistry Kinetics Macromolecular Substances Mice Microscopy, Atomic Force Microscopy, Confocal Microscopy, Interference Natural polymers Physicochemistry of polymers polymer Proteins Silicon Dioxide - chemistry Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission Starch and polysaccharides Substrate Specificity Surface Properties |
title | Adhesion Contact Dynamics of Fibroblasts on Biomacromolecular Surfaces |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A39%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adhesion%20Contact%20Dynamics%20of%20Fibroblasts%20on%20Biomacromolecular%20Surfaces&rft.jtitle=Macromolecular%20bioscience&rft.au=Fang,%20Ning&rft.date=2005-10-20&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1022&rft.epage=1031&rft.pages=1022-1031&rft.issn=1616-5187&rft.eissn=1616-5195&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mabi.200500123&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68717400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4423-a6c2d6812d09f8d6881f80a9a6dd3534543525e49984ee13d6e4d549ef282c5c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19434152&rft_id=info:pmid/16208681&rfr_iscdi=true |