Loading…

A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001

This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Health care management science 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206
Main Authors: Wholey, Douglas R, Engberg, John, Bryce, Cindy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473
container_end_page 206
container_issue 2
container_start_page 189
container_title Health care management science
container_volume 9
creator Wholey, Douglas R
Engberg, John
Bryce, Cindy
description This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68721522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68721522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9AblUqIec4hYe4esYrdI2UqRe2jPCGO-S2MYBvNL21xdrV43Uw8ATzLw3DAhdUfKFEiK_Zkok6IYQ0Ugh6vIGnVMuodFM6be1Zko0WgA5Qxc5PxFCOBH0PTqjQmnOKDtH7g53PrsU5hL2HtvJDoccMo49tnuf7NbjOcVucfU6lAO2Y5y2eOftUHZ4tGEqfrKT8zimrZ3CH1tCnPINplpxXCIGQugH9K63Q_YfT_sl-v3t_tfmR_P48_vD5u6xcYyp0jABmrdSiVa3EgRRgrFb0TnZKk6UdlzLXinoKXW6A-409Eo4ohyD1ulbyS7R9bFvdfyy-FzMGLLzw2AnH5dshJJAOUAlfv6P-BSXVJ-eDYCszoGzSqJHkksx5-R7M6cw2nQwlJg1fnOM39T4zRq_WR08HDXJz979Ezzbeeds8qPZG2Z1xaECViGzYS0r5gqqtIF6uitj7fXpZHJpR9-9Tj_9HfsLEAGXLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227985253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</creator><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-9620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16895313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer</publisher><subject>Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Efficiency, Organizational - trends ; Health care expenditures ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health Maintenance Organizations - economics ; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization &amp; administration ; HMOs ; Independent practice associations ; Managed care ; Models, Statistical ; Nonprofit organizations ; Physicians ; Production functions ; Productivity ; Studies ; Trends ; United States</subject><ispartof>Health care management science, 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/227985253/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/227985253?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kaphcarem/v_3a9_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a189-206.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><title>Health care management science</title><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><description>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</description><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational - trends</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Independent practice associations</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Production functions</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1386-9620</issn><issn>1572-9389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9AblUqIec4hYe4esYrdI2UqRe2jPCGO-S2MYBvNL21xdrV43Uw8ATzLw3DAhdUfKFEiK_Zkok6IYQ0Ugh6vIGnVMuodFM6be1Zko0WgA5Qxc5PxFCOBH0PTqjQmnOKDtH7g53PrsU5hL2HtvJDoccMo49tnuf7NbjOcVucfU6lAO2Y5y2eOftUHZ4tGEqfrKT8zimrZ3CH1tCnPINplpxXCIGQugH9K63Q_YfT_sl-v3t_tfmR_P48_vD5u6xcYyp0jABmrdSiVa3EgRRgrFb0TnZKk6UdlzLXinoKXW6A-409Eo4ohyD1ulbyS7R9bFvdfyy-FzMGLLzw2AnH5dshJJAOUAlfv6P-BSXVJ-eDYCszoGzSqJHkksx5-R7M6cw2nQwlJg1fnOM39T4zRq_WR08HDXJz979Ezzbeeds8qPZG2Z1xaECViGzYS0r5gqqtIF6uitj7fXpZHJpR9-9Tj_9HfsLEAGXLg</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Wholey, Douglas R</creator><creator>Engberg, John</creator><creator>Bryce, Cindy</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><author>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational - trends</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Independent practice associations</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Production functions</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wholey, Douglas R</au><au>Engberg, John</au><au>Bryce, Cindy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</atitle><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>189-206</pages><issn>1386-9620</issn><eissn>1572-9389</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16895313</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-9620
ispartof Health care management science, 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206
issn 1386-9620
1572-9389
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68721522
source Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Data envelopment analysis
Efficiency
Efficiency, Organizational - trends
Health care expenditures
Health maintenance organizations
Health Maintenance Organizations - economics
Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration
HMOs
Independent practice associations
Managed care
Models, Statistical
Nonprofit organizations
Physicians
Production functions
Productivity
Studies
Trends
United States
title A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20descriptive%20analysis%20of%20average%20productivity%20among%20health%20maintenance%20organizations,%201985%20to%202001&rft.jtitle=Health%20care%20management%20science&rft.au=Wholey,%20Douglas%20R&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=189-206&rft.issn=1386-9620&rft.eissn=1572-9389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68721522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227985253&rft_id=info:pmid/16895313&rfr_iscdi=true