Loading…
A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001
This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale...
Saved in:
Published in: | Health care management science 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473 |
container_end_page | 206 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 189 |
container_title | Health care management science |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Wholey, Douglas R Engberg, John Bryce, Cindy |
description | This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68721522</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68721522</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9AblUqIec4hYe4esYrdI2UqRe2jPCGO-S2MYBvNL21xdrV43Uw8ATzLw3DAhdUfKFEiK_Zkok6IYQ0Ugh6vIGnVMuodFM6be1Zko0WgA5Qxc5PxFCOBH0PTqjQmnOKDtH7g53PrsU5hL2HtvJDoccMo49tnuf7NbjOcVucfU6lAO2Y5y2eOftUHZ4tGEqfrKT8zimrZ3CH1tCnPINplpxXCIGQugH9K63Q_YfT_sl-v3t_tfmR_P48_vD5u6xcYyp0jABmrdSiVa3EgRRgrFb0TnZKk6UdlzLXinoKXW6A-409Eo4ohyD1ulbyS7R9bFvdfyy-FzMGLLzw2AnH5dshJJAOUAlfv6P-BSXVJ-eDYCszoGzSqJHkksx5-R7M6cw2nQwlJg1fnOM39T4zRq_WR08HDXJz979Ezzbeeds8qPZG2Z1xaECViGzYS0r5gqqtIF6uitj7fXpZHJpR9-9Tj_9HfsLEAGXLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>227985253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</creator><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-9620</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9389</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16895313</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Springer</publisher><subject>Data envelopment analysis ; Efficiency ; Efficiency, Organizational - trends ; Health care expenditures ; Health maintenance organizations ; Health Maintenance Organizations - economics ; Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration ; HMOs ; Independent practice associations ; Managed care ; Models, Statistical ; Nonprofit organizations ; Physicians ; Production functions ; Productivity ; Studies ; Trends ; United States</subject><ispartof>Health care management science, 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/227985253/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/227985253?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74767</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16895313$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/kaphcarem/v_3a9_3ay_3a2006_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a189-206.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><title>Health care management science</title><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><description>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</description><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Efficiency, Organizational - trends</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Health maintenance organizations</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</subject><subject>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</subject><subject>HMOs</subject><subject>Independent practice associations</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Nonprofit organizations</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Production functions</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1386-9620</issn><issn>1572-9389</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUU1v3CAURFWr5qP9AblUqIec4hYe4esYrdI2UqRe2jPCGO-S2MYBvNL21xdrV43Uw8ATzLw3DAhdUfKFEiK_Zkok6IYQ0Ugh6vIGnVMuodFM6be1Zko0WgA5Qxc5PxFCOBH0PTqjQmnOKDtH7g53PrsU5hL2HtvJDoccMo49tnuf7NbjOcVucfU6lAO2Y5y2eOftUHZ4tGEqfrKT8zimrZ3CH1tCnPINplpxXCIGQugH9K63Q_YfT_sl-v3t_tfmR_P48_vD5u6xcYyp0jABmrdSiVa3EgRRgrFb0TnZKk6UdlzLXinoKXW6A-409Eo4ohyD1ulbyS7R9bFvdfyy-FzMGLLzw2AnH5dshJJAOUAlfv6P-BSXVJ-eDYCszoGzSqJHkksx5-R7M6cw2nQwlJg1fnOM39T4zRq_WR08HDXJz979Ezzbeeds8qPZG2Z1xaECViGzYS0r5gqqtIF6uitj7fXpZHJpR9-9Tj_9HfsLEAGXLg</recordid><startdate>200605</startdate><enddate>200605</enddate><creator>Wholey, Douglas R</creator><creator>Engberg, John</creator><creator>Bryce, Cindy</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200605</creationdate><title>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</title><author>Wholey, Douglas R ; Engberg, John ; Bryce, Cindy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Efficiency, Organizational - trends</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Health maintenance organizations</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - economics</topic><topic>Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration</topic><topic>HMOs</topic><topic>Independent practice associations</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Nonprofit organizations</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Production functions</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wholey, Douglas R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Engberg, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryce, Cindy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wholey, Douglas R</au><au>Engberg, John</au><au>Bryce, Cindy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001</atitle><jtitle>Health care management science</jtitle><addtitle>Health Care Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2006-05</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>189-206</pages><issn>1386-9620</issn><eissn>1572-9389</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the evolution of average productivity among HMOs for 4,419 Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) from 1985 to 2001. For both IPA and non-IPA HMOs, HMO productivity increased from 1990 to 1996 and rapidly decreased from 1997 to 2001. In contrast to cost functions that show scale economies for IPA and non-IPA HMOs, production functions showed scale economies for IPA HMOs were constant and non-IPA HMOs having only slight scale economies. This suggests that much of the scale economies observed in cost functions are due to lower prices for resources used rather than improvements in production organization. Non-IPA HMOs and non-profit HMOs are more productive than IPA HMOs and for profit HMOs. Production organization for non-IPA HMOs appears to have improved over time, resulting in non-IPA HMOs being able to produce more member months of coverage with their production organization in 1997 to 2001 than they would have with their production organization in 1985 to 1990. Regulations requiring consumer involvement in HMO governance reduce productivity.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>16895313</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-9620 |
ispartof | Health care management science, 2006-05, Vol.9 (2), p.189-206 |
issn | 1386-9620 1572-9389 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68721522 |
source | Business Source Ultimate; EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Data envelopment analysis Efficiency Efficiency, Organizational - trends Health care expenditures Health maintenance organizations Health Maintenance Organizations - economics Health Maintenance Organizations - organization & administration HMOs Independent practice associations Managed care Models, Statistical Nonprofit organizations Physicians Production functions Productivity Studies Trends United States |
title | A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T04%3A42%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20descriptive%20analysis%20of%20average%20productivity%20among%20health%20maintenance%20organizations,%201985%20to%202001&rft.jtitle=Health%20care%20management%20science&rft.au=Wholey,%20Douglas%20R&rft.date=2006-05&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=189-206&rft.issn=1386-9620&rft.eissn=1572-9389&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68721522%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-36295b786b9b7260863346dc7b85089c597f882f11c9d25c92f86c08c32bc9473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=227985253&rft_id=info:pmid/16895313&rfr_iscdi=true |