Loading…
Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002
A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 no...
Saved in:
Published in: | Infection 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 339 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 333 |
container_title | Infection |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kern, W V de With, Katja Steib-Bauert, Michaela Fellhauer, M Plangger, A Probst, W |
description | A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals.
Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology.
Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up > 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was < 1 PDD/100.
This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68741957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68741957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkcFqHDEMhk1JaTZJH6CXYHLoKW6s8dgeH0No00Kgl_ZsPB45cdi1N_ZMwr59vexCIRcJpO8Xkn5CvgD_BpzrmwqSA2ecSya5NEx8ICvohWHcaHFCVlxwzgbo1Ck5q_WZN9D0-hM5BdXJYVBiReJtmuMY8xw9XSrSmGjKiS0pvmKpcd7Rgo8xJ7emzi8zUu8K0kdMWFrpKddtnN267nU1L_PTG9YZS6L3WDYu7a5pxzmwFroL8jE0Ej8f8zn5--P7n7uf7OH3_a-72wfmhYSZqcGMOPU66ElpgX2v5OSn4MygOwwgAvoutI7xSsOkRnTQiSC99j6MEwZxTr4e5m5LflnaOnYTq8f12iXMS7Vq0D0YqRt49Q58zktpl1bbgVQgBmMaBAfIl1xrwWC3JW5c2Vngdm-CPZhg22_t3gQrmubyOHgZNzj9Vxy_Lv4Boc6C2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215613899</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W ; MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team ; and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><description>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals.
Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology.
Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up > 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was < 1 PDD/100.
This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8126</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16258863</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; beta-Lactams - therapeutic use ; Drug Utilization ; Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use ; Germany ; Glycopeptides - therapeutic use ; Health Facility Size ; Hospital Departments ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, General ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Internal Medicine ; Surgery Department, Hospital</subject><ispartof>Infection, 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339</ispartof><rights>Urban & Vogel München 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16258863$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de With, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellhauer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plangger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><title>Infection</title><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><description>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals.
Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology.
Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up > 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was < 1 PDD/100.
This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</description><subject>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>beta-Lactams - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Drug Utilization</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Glycopeptides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Health Facility Size</subject><subject>Hospital Departments</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, General</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Surgery Department, Hospital</subject><issn>0300-8126</issn><issn>1439-0973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkcFqHDEMhk1JaTZJH6CXYHLoKW6s8dgeH0No00Kgl_ZsPB45cdi1N_ZMwr59vexCIRcJpO8Xkn5CvgD_BpzrmwqSA2ecSya5NEx8ICvohWHcaHFCVlxwzgbo1Ck5q_WZN9D0-hM5BdXJYVBiReJtmuMY8xw9XSrSmGjKiS0pvmKpcd7Rgo8xJ7emzi8zUu8K0kdMWFrpKddtnN267nU1L_PTG9YZS6L3WDYu7a5pxzmwFroL8jE0Ej8f8zn5--P7n7uf7OH3_a-72wfmhYSZqcGMOPU66ElpgX2v5OSn4MygOwwgAvoutI7xSsOkRnTQiSC99j6MEwZxTr4e5m5LflnaOnYTq8f12iXMS7Vq0D0YqRt49Q58zktpl1bbgVQgBmMaBAfIl1xrwWC3JW5c2Vngdm-CPZhg22_t3gQrmubyOHgZNzj9Vxy_Lv4Boc6C2g</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Kern, W V</creator><creator>de With, Katja</creator><creator>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creator><creator>Fellhauer, M</creator><creator>Plangger, A</creator><creator>Probst, W</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</title><author>Kern, W V ; de With, Katja ; Steib-Bauert, Michaela ; Fellhauer, M ; Plangger, A ; Probst, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>beta-Lactams - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Drug Utilization</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Glycopeptides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Health Facility Size</topic><topic>Hospital Departments</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, General</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Surgery Department, Hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kern, W V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de With, Katja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fellhauer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plangger, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Probst, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kern, W V</au><au>de With, Katja</au><au>Steib-Bauert, Michaela</au><au>Fellhauer, M</au><au>Plangger, A</au><au>Probst, W</au><aucorp>MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II Project Team</aucorp><aucorp>and the MABUSE–INTERREGIO–II Project Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002</atitle><jtitle>Infection</jtitle><addtitle>Infection</addtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>333</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>333-339</pages><issn>0300-8126</issn><eissn>1439-0973</eissn><abstract>A previous study from Germany showed high antibiotic use in university hospitals, particularly in intensive care units (ICU) and hematology-oncology services, but there has been no information about recent antibiotic use in non-university hospitals. In the present study, we collected data from 40 non-university regional general hospitals located in the southwestern part of the country, and analyzed use density in the medical and surgical services of these hospitals.
Hospital pharmacy records for the calendar years 2001 and 2002 were evaluated. The number of defined daily doses (DDD, definition according to the WHO/ATC 2001 index) and prescribed daily doses (PDD) per 100 patient days (DDD/100 or PDD/100, respectively) were calculated to compare antibiotic use densities in medical and surgical services. Data for surgery included various subspecialties and gynecology.
Antibiotic use in the participating hospitals increased minimally between 2001 and 2002 both in medicine as well as in surgery. Use density in internal medicine (ICU areas excluded) in the year 2002 ranged between 13.5 and 93.7 DDD/100 with a weighted mean of 49.9 DDD/100 (corresponding to 28.6 PDD/100, respectively). Values for surgery were lower with a weighted mean of 43.4 DDD/100 (corresponding to 26.1 PDD/100, range, 10 to 65.4 DDD/100), respectively. Hospital size was not a strong predictor of use density, while large differences were observed between intensive care areas and normal wards. Mean use densities in intensive care areas in 2002 were 105.6 DDD/100 (or 49.7 PDD/100) in medical intensive care units, 116.9 DDD/100 (or 61.2 PDD/100) in surgical intensive care units, and 112.7 DDD/100 (or 66.7 PDD/100) in mixed, interdisciplinary intensive care units. Betalactams made up > 50% of all PDDs, while fluoroquinolones were the second most frequently prescribed drugs (15% of all PDDs). Fluoroquinolones were usually given orally. Overall glycopeptide and aminoglycoside use was < 1 PDD/100.
This recent data from a large regional nonuniversity acute care hospital sample confirms that hospital antibiotic use density largely depends on patient care areas and less on hospital size. Surprisingly low use was observed for glycopeptides and aminoglycosides. The data may be useful as a benchmark for further pharmaco-epidemiologic evaluation and focused drug use control interventions.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16258863</pmid><doi>10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-8126 |
ispartof | Infection, 2005-10, Vol.33 (5-6), p.333-339 |
issn | 0300-8126 1439-0973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68741957 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Aminoglycosides - therapeutic use Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use beta-Lactams - therapeutic use Drug Utilization Fluoroquinolones - therapeutic use Germany Glycopeptides - therapeutic use Health Facility Size Hospital Departments Hospitals Hospitals, General Humans Intensive Care Units Internal Medicine Surgery Department, Hospital |
title | Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001-2002 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T04%3A32%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antibiotic%20use%20in%20non-university%20regional%20acute%20care%20general%20hospitals%20in%20southwestern%20Germany,%202001-2002&rft.jtitle=Infection&rft.au=Kern,%20W%20V&rft.aucorp=MABUSE-INTERREGIO-II%20Project%20Team&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=333&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=333-339&rft.issn=0300-8126&rft.eissn=1439-0973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s15010-005-5059-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68741957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-689bed47f7d673e4465dcdfa9872ef13fec2f6739c671d6bea123f5c7ccfbdef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215613899&rft_id=info:pmid/16258863&rfr_iscdi=true |