Loading…
Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex
We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categorie...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3 |
container_end_page | 1461 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1453 |
container_title | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Downing, P. E. Chan, A. W.-Y. Peelen, M. V. Dodds, C. M. Kanwisher, N. |
description | We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/cercor/bhj086 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68795461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19317072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbK0u3UpRcBc778dS4qNq0YVVpJshmU5watLUmQTsv3ckxYIbV_de7uGD7wBwjOAFgoqMjPWm9qP8fQEl3wF9RDlMMFJqN-6QioRghHrgIIQFhEhghvdBD3FCFJS0D86u6ipzy-HzyhpXOOOa9TCery60WTlMa9_Yr0OwV2RlsEebOQAvN9fTdJxMnm7v0stJYijmTWKMYiynyhREsgLTHAtaSIPwHOZMYlYQYeaZNMIKQYRkglKCcZYzhgVCxpABOO9yV77-bG1odOWCsWWZLW3dBs2lUIxy9C-IFEECChzB0z_gom79MpaIjBScKyojlHSQ8XUI3hZ65V2V-bVGUP841p1j3TmO_MkmtM0rO9_SG6nbQBeivd9_5j80j82ZHr_N9BjdP6ZiNtUP5BuJvYWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198766948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16339084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; bodies ; Brain Mapping ; cortex ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; faces ; fMRI ; Humans ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; scenes ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; visual selectivity</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peelen, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><description>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>bodies</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>cortex</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>faces</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>scenes</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>visual selectivity</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbK0u3UpRcBc778dS4qNq0YVVpJshmU5watLUmQTsv3ckxYIbV_de7uGD7wBwjOAFgoqMjPWm9qP8fQEl3wF9RDlMMFJqN-6QioRghHrgIIQFhEhghvdBD3FCFJS0D86u6ipzy-HzyhpXOOOa9TCery60WTlMa9_Yr0OwV2RlsEebOQAvN9fTdJxMnm7v0stJYijmTWKMYiynyhREsgLTHAtaSIPwHOZMYlYQYeaZNMIKQYRkglKCcZYzhgVCxpABOO9yV77-bG1odOWCsWWZLW3dBs2lUIxy9C-IFEECChzB0z_gom79MpaIjBScKyojlHSQ8XUI3hZ65V2V-bVGUP841p1j3TmO_MkmtM0rO9_SG6nbQBeivd9_5j80j82ZHr_N9BjdP6ZiNtUP5BuJvYWx</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Downing, P. E.</creator><creator>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creator><creator>Peelen, M. V.</creator><creator>Dodds, C. M.</creator><creator>Kanwisher, N.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><author>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>bodies</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>cortex</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>faces</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>scenes</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>visual selectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peelen, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Downing, P. E.</au><au>Chan, A. W.-Y.</au><au>Peelen, M. V.</au><au>Dodds, C. M.</au><au>Kanwisher, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1453</spage><epage>1461</epage><pages>1453-1461</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16339084</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhj086</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1047-3211 |
ispartof | Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461 |
issn | 1047-3211 1460-2199 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68795461 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Adult bodies Brain Mapping cortex Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology faces fMRI Humans Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology scenes Sensitivity and Specificity Visual Cortex - physiology visual selectivity |
title | Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domain%20Specificity%20in%20Visual%20Cortex&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Downing,%20P.%20E.&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1453&rft.epage=1461&rft.pages=1453-1461&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhj086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19317072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198766948&rft_id=info:pmid/16339084&rfr_iscdi=true |