Loading…

Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex

We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categorie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991) N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461
Main Authors: Downing, P. E., Chan, A. W.-Y., Peelen, M. V., Dodds, C. M., Kanwisher, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3
container_end_page 1461
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1453
container_title Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)
container_volume 16
creator Downing, P. E.
Chan, A. W.-Y.
Peelen, M. V.
Dodds, C. M.
Kanwisher, N.
description We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cercor/bhj086
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68795461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19317072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbK0u3UpRcBc778dS4qNq0YVVpJshmU5watLUmQTsv3ckxYIbV_de7uGD7wBwjOAFgoqMjPWm9qP8fQEl3wF9RDlMMFJqN-6QioRghHrgIIQFhEhghvdBD3FCFJS0D86u6ipzy-HzyhpXOOOa9TCery60WTlMa9_Yr0OwV2RlsEebOQAvN9fTdJxMnm7v0stJYijmTWKMYiynyhREsgLTHAtaSIPwHOZMYlYQYeaZNMIKQYRkglKCcZYzhgVCxpABOO9yV77-bG1odOWCsWWZLW3dBs2lUIxy9C-IFEECChzB0z_gom79MpaIjBScKyojlHSQ8XUI3hZ65V2V-bVGUP841p1j3TmO_MkmtM0rO9_SG6nbQBeivd9_5j80j82ZHr_N9BjdP6ZiNtUP5BuJvYWx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>198766948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-3211</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2199</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj086</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16339084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; bodies ; Brain Mapping ; cortex ; Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology ; faces ; fMRI ; Humans ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; scenes ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Visual Cortex - physiology ; visual selectivity</subject><ispartof>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16339084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peelen, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><title>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</title><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><description>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>bodies</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>cortex</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>faces</subject><subject>fMRI</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>scenes</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Visual Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>visual selectivity</subject><issn>1047-3211</issn><issn>1460-2199</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AURgdRbK0u3UpRcBc778dS4qNq0YVVpJshmU5watLUmQTsv3ckxYIbV_de7uGD7wBwjOAFgoqMjPWm9qP8fQEl3wF9RDlMMFJqN-6QioRghHrgIIQFhEhghvdBD3FCFJS0D86u6ipzy-HzyhpXOOOa9TCery60WTlMa9_Yr0OwV2RlsEebOQAvN9fTdJxMnm7v0stJYijmTWKMYiynyhREsgLTHAtaSIPwHOZMYlYQYeaZNMIKQYRkglKCcZYzhgVCxpABOO9yV77-bG1odOWCsWWZLW3dBs2lUIxy9C-IFEECChzB0z_gom79MpaIjBScKyojlHSQ8XUI3hZ65V2V-bVGUP841p1j3TmO_MkmtM0rO9_SG6nbQBeivd9_5j80j82ZHr_N9BjdP6ZiNtUP5BuJvYWx</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Downing, P. E.</creator><creator>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creator><creator>Peelen, M. V.</creator><creator>Dodds, C. M.</creator><creator>Kanwisher, N.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</title><author>Downing, P. E. ; Chan, A. W.-Y. ; Peelen, M. V. ; Dodds, C. M. ; Kanwisher, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>bodies</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>cortex</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>faces</topic><topic>fMRI</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>scenes</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Visual Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>visual selectivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Downing, P. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, A. W.-Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peelen, M. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodds, C. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanwisher, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Downing, P. E.</au><au>Chan, A. W.-Y.</au><au>Peelen, M. V.</au><au>Dodds, C. M.</au><au>Kanwisher, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex</atitle><jtitle>Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991)</jtitle><addtitle>Cereb. Cortex</addtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1453</spage><epage>1461</epage><pages>1453-1461</pages><issn>1047-3211</issn><eissn>1460-2199</eissn><abstract>We investigated the prevalence and specificity of category-selective regions in human visual cortex. In the broadest survey to date of category selectivity in visual cortex, 12 participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging while viewing scenes and 19 different object categories in a blocked-design experiment. As expected, we found selectivity for faces in the fusiform face area (FFA), for scenes in the parahippocampal place area (PPA), and for bodies in the extrastriate body area (EBA). In addition, we describe 3 main new findings. First, evidence for the selectivity of the FFA, PPA, and EBA was strengthened by the finding that each area responded significantly more strongly to its preferred category than to the next most effective of the remaining 19 stimulus categories tested. Second, a region in the middle temporal gyrus that has been reported to respond significantly more strongly to tools than to animals did not respond significantly more strongly to tools than to other nontool categories (such as fruits and vegetables), casting doubt on the characterization of this region as tool selective. Finally, we did not find any new regions in the occipitotemporal pathway that were strongly selective for other categories. Taken together, these results demonstrate both the strong selectivity of a small number of regions and the scarcity of such regions in visual cortex.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>16339084</pmid><doi>10.1093/cercor/bhj086</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-3211
ispartof Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. 1991), 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.1453-1461
issn 1047-3211
1460-2199
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68795461
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Adult
bodies
Brain Mapping
cortex
Evoked Potentials, Visual - physiology
faces
fMRI
Humans
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
scenes
Sensitivity and Specificity
Visual Cortex - physiology
visual selectivity
title Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A50%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domain%20Specificity%20in%20Visual%20Cortex&rft.jtitle=Cerebral%20cortex%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.%201991)&rft.au=Downing,%20P.%20E.&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1453&rft.epage=1461&rft.pages=1453-1461&rft.issn=1047-3211&rft.eissn=1460-2199&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cercor/bhj086&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19317072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-cc955b49cf385f24b274f8c12d0b5825f37cda8c7e773785744322ab552711cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198766948&rft_id=info:pmid/16339084&rfr_iscdi=true