Loading…
Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice?
To compare the intraoperative results of inguinal versus subinguinal varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe, in terms of vein ligation and arterial preservation, recurrence rate, and patient tolerability. Ninety-nine patients were randomized to undergo a varicocele repair with an inguinal or a subin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2005-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1075-1079 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73 |
container_end_page | 1079 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1075 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Gontero, Paolo Pretti, Giuliano Fontana, Francesco Zitella, Andrea Marchioro, Giansilvio Frea, Bruno |
description | To compare the intraoperative results of inguinal versus subinguinal varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe, in terms of vein ligation and arterial preservation, recurrence rate, and patient tolerability.
Ninety-nine patients were randomized to undergo a varicocele repair with an inguinal or a subinguinal approach under local anesthesia. Data concerning the number of veins ligated and arterial preservation were recorded during each procedure. The amount of intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The recurrence rate was documented by color Doppler ultrasound examination.
The average number of ligated veins was 5.6 with a subinguinal dissection and 4.4 with the inguinal approach. Inadvertent injury of the spermatic artery occurred in 6 of 47 subinguinal and 3 of 50 inguinal dissections; the artery could not be identified during 2 subinguinal and 1 inguinal dissection. Recurrent varicocele was detected in 8% and 14.9% of patients after an inguinal and a subinguinal approach, respectively. The intraoperative VAS score was significantly higher in the inguinal than in the subinguinal patients (
P = 0.008).
In our hands, the inguinal approach to the spermatic cord showed a trend toward an easier preservation of the artery and a reduced incidence of persistent pathologic vein reflux. The subinguinal approach had a lower degree of intraoperative pain. On the whole, an inguinal repair might be preferable when magnifying loupe are used for varicocelectomy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.009 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68800433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429505006473</els_id><sourcerecordid>68800433</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoMo7rj6CEoueusx6UySjpdlWfyzsOBF8RjS6eqZGnrSbdJZmCfxdU0zjXsUClJUfl_lSxUhbznbcsbVx-M2x3EY9-dtzZjcLsHMM7LhstaVMUY-J5tSYdWuNvKKvErpyBhTSumX5IqrulG81hvy5z7sMwY30EeIKSeacov_Si6iHz0MUG4x0AH3bsYx0JwKQ09uH7A_L-kw5gloDh3EkvuidQHSfICE7hP9dUB_oDP4Q8DfGSgmOkXoIbq2tC6N_YABF9UUnZ_Rw81r8qJ3Q4I363lNfn75_OPuW_Xw_ev93e1D5YURc1VLJqTphJB9q4X0TijR7FTf-r4F3UNnnFQdMzuutdM1-BpMw53STZHoIrkmHy59pzgWa2m2J0zlx0PxP-ZkVdMwthOigPIC-jimVNzbKeLJxbPlzC4bsUe7bsQuG7FLMFN079YHcnuC7km1rqAA71fApTKCPrrgMT1xum50Yxbu5sJBGccjQrTJIwQPHUbws-1G_I-VvzRPsJU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68800433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice?</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gontero, Paolo ; Pretti, Giuliano ; Fontana, Francesco ; Zitella, Andrea ; Marchioro, Giansilvio ; Frea, Bruno</creator><creatorcontrib>Gontero, Paolo ; Pretti, Giuliano ; Fontana, Francesco ; Zitella, Andrea ; Marchioro, Giansilvio ; Frea, Bruno</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the intraoperative results of inguinal versus subinguinal varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe, in terms of vein ligation and arterial preservation, recurrence rate, and patient tolerability.
Ninety-nine patients were randomized to undergo a varicocele repair with an inguinal or a subinguinal approach under local anesthesia. Data concerning the number of veins ligated and arterial preservation were recorded during each procedure. The amount of intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The recurrence rate was documented by color Doppler ultrasound examination.
The average number of ligated veins was 5.6 with a subinguinal dissection and 4.4 with the inguinal approach. Inadvertent injury of the spermatic artery occurred in 6 of 47 subinguinal and 3 of 50 inguinal dissections; the artery could not be identified during 2 subinguinal and 1 inguinal dissection. Recurrent varicocele was detected in 8% and 14.9% of patients after an inguinal and a subinguinal approach, respectively. The intraoperative VAS score was significantly higher in the inguinal than in the subinguinal patients (
P = 0.008).
In our hands, the inguinal approach to the spermatic cord showed a trend toward an easier preservation of the artery and a reduced incidence of persistent pathologic vein reflux. The subinguinal approach had a lower degree of intraoperative pain. On the whole, an inguinal repair might be preferable when magnifying loupe are used for varicocelectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16286127</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia, Local ; Biological and medical sciences ; Groin ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Ligation - instrumentation ; Ligation - methods ; Male ; Male genital diseases ; Medical sciences ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Non tumoral diseases ; Testis - blood supply ; Varicocele - surgery ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods ; Veins</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2005-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1075-1079</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17287897$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16286127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gontero, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretti, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontana, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitella, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchioro, Giansilvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frea, Bruno</creatorcontrib><title>Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice?</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To compare the intraoperative results of inguinal versus subinguinal varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe, in terms of vein ligation and arterial preservation, recurrence rate, and patient tolerability.
Ninety-nine patients were randomized to undergo a varicocele repair with an inguinal or a subinguinal approach under local anesthesia. Data concerning the number of veins ligated and arterial preservation were recorded during each procedure. The amount of intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The recurrence rate was documented by color Doppler ultrasound examination.
The average number of ligated veins was 5.6 with a subinguinal dissection and 4.4 with the inguinal approach. Inadvertent injury of the spermatic artery occurred in 6 of 47 subinguinal and 3 of 50 inguinal dissections; the artery could not be identified during 2 subinguinal and 1 inguinal dissection. Recurrent varicocele was detected in 8% and 14.9% of patients after an inguinal and a subinguinal approach, respectively. The intraoperative VAS score was significantly higher in the inguinal than in the subinguinal patients (
P = 0.008).
In our hands, the inguinal approach to the spermatic cord showed a trend toward an easier preservation of the artery and a reduced incidence of persistent pathologic vein reflux. The subinguinal approach had a lower degree of intraoperative pain. On the whole, an inguinal repair might be preferable when magnifying loupe are used for varicocelectomy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia, Local</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Groin</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Ligation - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Male genital diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Non tumoral diseases</subject><subject>Testis - blood supply</subject><subject>Varicocele - surgery</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Veins</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc-KFDEQxoMo7rj6CEoueusx6UySjpdlWfyzsOBF8RjS6eqZGnrSbdJZmCfxdU0zjXsUClJUfl_lSxUhbznbcsbVx-M2x3EY9-dtzZjcLsHMM7LhstaVMUY-J5tSYdWuNvKKvErpyBhTSumX5IqrulG81hvy5z7sMwY30EeIKSeacov_Si6iHz0MUG4x0AH3bsYx0JwKQ09uH7A_L-kw5gloDh3EkvuidQHSfICE7hP9dUB_oDP4Q8DfGSgmOkXoIbq2tC6N_YABF9UUnZ_Rw81r8qJ3Q4I363lNfn75_OPuW_Xw_ev93e1D5YURc1VLJqTphJB9q4X0TijR7FTf-r4F3UNnnFQdMzuutdM1-BpMw53STZHoIrkmHy59pzgWa2m2J0zlx0PxP-ZkVdMwthOigPIC-jimVNzbKeLJxbPlzC4bsUe7bsQuG7FLMFN079YHcnuC7km1rqAA71fApTKCPrrgMT1xum50Yxbu5sJBGccjQrTJIwQPHUbws-1G_I-VvzRPsJU</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Gontero, Paolo</creator><creator>Pretti, Giuliano</creator><creator>Fontana, Francesco</creator><creator>Zitella, Andrea</creator><creator>Marchioro, Giansilvio</creator><creator>Frea, Bruno</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice?</title><author>Gontero, Paolo ; Pretti, Giuliano ; Fontana, Francesco ; Zitella, Andrea ; Marchioro, Giansilvio ; Frea, Bruno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia, Local</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Groin</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Ligation - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Male genital diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Non tumoral diseases</topic><topic>Testis - blood supply</topic><topic>Varicocele - surgery</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Veins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gontero, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretti, Giuliano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontana, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zitella, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchioro, Giansilvio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frea, Bruno</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gontero, Paolo</au><au>Pretti, Giuliano</au><au>Fontana, Francesco</au><au>Zitella, Andrea</au><au>Marchioro, Giansilvio</au><au>Frea, Bruno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice?</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1075</spage><epage>1079</epage><pages>1075-1079</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>To compare the intraoperative results of inguinal versus subinguinal varicocelectomy using magnifying loupe, in terms of vein ligation and arterial preservation, recurrence rate, and patient tolerability.
Ninety-nine patients were randomized to undergo a varicocele repair with an inguinal or a subinguinal approach under local anesthesia. Data concerning the number of veins ligated and arterial preservation were recorded during each procedure. The amount of intraoperative and postoperative pain was assessed by means of visual analogue scale (VAS) scores. The recurrence rate was documented by color Doppler ultrasound examination.
The average number of ligated veins was 5.6 with a subinguinal dissection and 4.4 with the inguinal approach. Inadvertent injury of the spermatic artery occurred in 6 of 47 subinguinal and 3 of 50 inguinal dissections; the artery could not be identified during 2 subinguinal and 1 inguinal dissection. Recurrent varicocele was detected in 8% and 14.9% of patients after an inguinal and a subinguinal approach, respectively. The intraoperative VAS score was significantly higher in the inguinal than in the subinguinal patients (
P = 0.008).
In our hands, the inguinal approach to the spermatic cord showed a trend toward an easier preservation of the artery and a reduced incidence of persistent pathologic vein reflux. The subinguinal approach had a lower degree of intraoperative pain. On the whole, an inguinal repair might be preferable when magnifying loupe are used for varicocelectomy.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>16286127</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.009</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2005-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1075-1079 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68800433 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Anesthesia, Local Biological and medical sciences Groin Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Ligation - instrumentation Ligation - methods Male Male genital diseases Medical sciences Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Non tumoral diseases Testis - blood supply Varicocele - surgery Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods Veins |
title | Inguinal versus subinguinal varicocele vein ligation using magnifying loupe under local anesthesia: Which technique is preferable in clinical practice? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A28%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inguinal%20versus%20subinguinal%20varicocele%20vein%20ligation%20using%20magnifying%20loupe%20under%20local%20anesthesia:%20Which%20technique%20is%20preferable%20in%20clinical%20practice?&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Gontero,%20Paolo&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1075&rft.epage=1079&rft.pages=1075-1079&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68800433%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-250359d335fb735ca363846fbcfbe7fed9a56d094177a72ec2e981a6783357b73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68800433&rft_id=info:pmid/16286127&rfr_iscdi=true |