Loading…

Permeability studies in chitosan membranes. Effects of crosslinking and poly(ethylene oxide) addition

Pure chitosan, glutaraldehyde crosslinked chitosan, and a blend of chitosan with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) membranes were prepared and characterized in terms of their swelling capacity and permeability to a drug model (sulfamerazine sodium salt). Pure chitosan, glutaraldehyde crosslinked chitosan,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Carbohydrate research 2005-12, Vol.340 (17), p.2630-2636
Main Authors: Neto, C.G.T., Dantas, T.N.C., Fonseca, J.L.C., Pereira, M.R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pure chitosan, glutaraldehyde crosslinked chitosan, and a blend of chitosan with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) membranes were prepared and characterized in terms of their swelling capacity and permeability to a drug model (sulfamerazine sodium salt). Pure chitosan, glutaraldehyde crosslinked chitosan, and a blend of chitosan with poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) membranes were prepared. The three membranes were characterized in terms of their swelling capacities as well as their permeabilities to a drug model (sulfamerazine sodium salt). For the permeation experiments, the variables analyzed were the type of membrane and the initial drug concentration in the liquid phase (from 0.1% to 1.5%). Permeability coefficients were calculated using UV spectroscopy. The results showed that for the three analyzed membranes, the permeability did not change with time (over the studied time interval). An increase in the permeability for CHI/PEO membranes compared to those made of pure chitosan was also observed, possibly due to microporous region formation and/or crystallinity reduction. For the crosslinked membrane, an even higher increase in the permeability coefficient was observed. In this case, the increase was attributed to free volume variation.
ISSN:0008-6215
1873-426X
DOI:10.1016/j.carres.2005.09.011