Loading…
Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department
Objective: To review the definition of ‘primary care’ and ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a ‘primary care’ presentation in ED. Method: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used. Results: A total of 34 review...
Saved in:
Published in: | Emergency medicine Australasia 2005-10, Vol.17 (5-6), p.472-479 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323 |
container_end_page | 479 |
container_issue | 5-6 |
container_start_page | 472 |
container_title | Emergency medicine Australasia |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Bezzina, Andrew J Smith, Peter B Cromwell, David Eagar, Kathy |
description | Objective: To review the definition of ‘primary care’ and ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a ‘primary care’ presentation in ED.
Method: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used.
Results: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential ‘primary care’, ‘general practice’, or ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers:
•
Low urgency/acuity – triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale
•
Self‐referred – by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on
•
Presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self‐referred)
•
Unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted
Discussion: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00779.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68823248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68823248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkclOwzAQhi0EYn8F5BOcErxksRESQghapLIcWI6Wk0zApUmKnUL7ILwvDi3lghC-eOT5v_nl-RHClITUn8NhSNOIBUnKeMgIiUNC0lSG0xW0uWysLmtON9CWc0NCmIioXEcbNOGEyYhsoo9bayptZzjXFvBYtwbq1mFT4_YZMFRgn6DOZ7iAsbZt5ZtH-PG5wZ3aK2Yn-BRbeDPwjpvyiymgNLVpTVN_vxyMf_E4-MtjB62VeuRgd3Fvo_uL87uzfjC46V2enQ6CnFMpA8qjnLIs0TkwCQA0TgpI4jQVwIiUPI5klmkuaJllIERBmF-IICIt8pIAZ3wb7c_njm3zOgHXqsq4HEYjXUMzcSoRgnEWCS8Uc2FuG-cslGrxJ0WJ6iJRQ9VtW3WbV10k6isSNfXo3sJjklVQ_ICLDLzgeC54NyOY_XuwOr-68oXHgzluXAvTJa7ti2d4GqvH655Kot4D618TxfgnA02qlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68823248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>Bezzina, Andrew J ; Smith, Peter B ; Cromwell, David ; Eagar, Kathy</creator><creatorcontrib>Bezzina, Andrew J ; Smith, Peter B ; Cromwell, David ; Eagar, Kathy</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To review the definition of ‘primary care’ and ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a ‘primary care’ presentation in ED.
Method: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used.
Results: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential ‘primary care’, ‘general practice’, or ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers:
•
Low urgency/acuity – triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale
•
Self‐referred – by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on
•
Presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self‐referred)
•
Unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted
Discussion: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6723</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00779.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16302940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne, Australia: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Australia ; Canada ; emergency department ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration ; Europe ; Family Practice ; Humans ; inappropriate patient ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care ; Patient Admission ; primary care ; Primary Health Care - organization & administration ; Research Design ; Terminology as Topic ; Triage - methods ; United States</subject><ispartof>Emergency medicine Australasia, 2005-10, Vol.17 (5-6), p.472-479</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16302940$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bezzina, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eagar, Kathy</creatorcontrib><title>Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department</title><title>Emergency medicine Australasia</title><addtitle>Emerg Med Australas</addtitle><description>Objective: To review the definition of ‘primary care’ and ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a ‘primary care’ presentation in ED.
Method: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used.
Results: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential ‘primary care’, ‘general practice’, or ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers:
•
Low urgency/acuity – triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale
•
Self‐referred – by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on
•
Presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self‐referred)
•
Unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted
Discussion: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>Family Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>inappropriate patient</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Admission</subject><subject>primary care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Terminology as Topic</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1742-6731</issn><issn>1742-6723</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkclOwzAQhi0EYn8F5BOcErxksRESQghapLIcWI6Wk0zApUmKnUL7ILwvDi3lghC-eOT5v_nl-RHClITUn8NhSNOIBUnKeMgIiUNC0lSG0xW0uWysLmtON9CWc0NCmIioXEcbNOGEyYhsoo9bayptZzjXFvBYtwbq1mFT4_YZMFRgn6DOZ7iAsbZt5ZtH-PG5wZ3aK2Yn-BRbeDPwjpvyiymgNLVpTVN_vxyMf_E4-MtjB62VeuRgd3Fvo_uL87uzfjC46V2enQ6CnFMpA8qjnLIs0TkwCQA0TgpI4jQVwIiUPI5klmkuaJllIERBmF-IICIt8pIAZ3wb7c_njm3zOgHXqsq4HEYjXUMzcSoRgnEWCS8Uc2FuG-cslGrxJ0WJ6iJRQ9VtW3WbV10k6isSNfXo3sJjklVQ_ICLDLzgeC54NyOY_XuwOr-68oXHgzluXAvTJa7ti2d4GqvH655Kot4D618TxfgnA02qlA</recordid><startdate>200510</startdate><enddate>200510</enddate><creator>Bezzina, Andrew J</creator><creator>Smith, Peter B</creator><creator>Cromwell, David</creator><creator>Eagar, Kathy</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200510</creationdate><title>Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department</title><author>Bezzina, Andrew J ; Smith, Peter B ; Cromwell, David ; Eagar, Kathy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>Family Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>inappropriate patient</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Admission</topic><topic>primary care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Terminology as Topic</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bezzina, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Peter B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cromwell, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eagar, Kathy</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Emergency medicine Australasia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bezzina, Andrew J</au><au>Smith, Peter B</au><au>Cromwell, David</au><au>Eagar, Kathy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department</atitle><jtitle>Emergency medicine Australasia</jtitle><addtitle>Emerg Med Australas</addtitle><date>2005-10</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>472</spage><epage>479</epage><pages>472-479</pages><issn>1742-6731</issn><eissn>1742-6723</eissn><abstract>Objective: To review the definition of ‘primary care’ and ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED and develop a generally acceptable working definition of a ‘primary care’ presentation in ED.
Method: A Medline review of articles on primary care in ED and the definitions used.
Results: A total of 34 reviewed papers contained a proposed definition or comment on the definition for potential ‘primary care’, ‘general practice’, or ‘inappropriate’ patients in ED. A representative definition was developed premised on the common factors in these papers:
•
Low urgency/acuity – triage categories four or five in the Australasian Triage Scale
•
Self‐referred – by definition, patients referred by general practitioner/community primary medical services are not primary care cases because a primary care service has referred them on
•
Presenting for a new episode of care (i.e. not a planned return because planned returns are not self‐referred)
•
Unlikely to be admitted (in the opinion of Emergency Nurse interviewers) or ultimately not admitted
Discussion: This definition can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively, depending on the purpose. Appropriateness must be considered in light of a legitimate role for ED in primary care and the balance of resources between primary care and emergency medicine in local settings.</abstract><cop>Melbourne, Australia</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>16302940</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00779.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6731 |
ispartof | Emergency medicine Australasia, 2005-10, Vol.17 (5-6), p.472-479 |
issn | 1742-6731 1742-6723 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68823248 |
source | Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list) |
subjects | Acute Disease Australia Canada emergency department Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration Europe Family Practice Humans inappropriate patient Patient Acceptance of Health Care Patient Admission primary care Primary Health Care - organization & administration Research Design Terminology as Topic Triage - methods United States |
title | Primary care patients in the emergency department: Who are they? A review of the definition of the 'primary care patient' in the emergency department |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T01%3A29%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Primary%20care%20patients%20in%20the%20emergency%20department:%20Who%20are%20they?%20A%20review%20of%20the%20definition%20of%20the%20'primary%20care%20patient'%20in%20the%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=Emergency%20medicine%20Australasia&rft.au=Bezzina,%20Andrew%20J&rft.date=2005-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=479&rft.pages=472-479&rft.issn=1742-6731&rft.eissn=1742-6723&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00779.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68823248%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3199-134c12b6ace29eee156de65778e20993549bba381fbbe88d027428087dcf0e323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68823248&rft_id=info:pmid/16302940&rfr_iscdi=true |