Loading…
Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality
This study aimed at assessment of efficacy of selective in-plane shielding in adults by quantitative evaluation of the achieved dose reduction and image quality. Commercially available accessories for in-plane shielding of the eye lens, thyroid and breast, and an anthropomorphic phantom were used fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | European radiology 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2334-2340 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23 |
container_end_page | 2340 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2334 |
container_title | European radiology |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Geleijns, J Salvadó Artells, M Veldkamp, W J H López Tortosa, M Calzado Cantera, A |
description | This study aimed at assessment of efficacy of selective in-plane shielding in adults by quantitative evaluation of the achieved dose reduction and image quality. Commercially available accessories for in-plane shielding of the eye lens, thyroid and breast, and an anthropomorphic phantom were used for the evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Organ dose and total energy imparted were assessed by means of a Monte Carlo technique taking into account tube voltage, tube current, and scanner type. Image quality was quantified as noise in soft tissue. Application of the lens shield reduced dose to the lens by 27% and to the brain by 1%. The thyroid shield reduced thyroid dose by 26%; the breast shield reduced dose to the breasts by 30% and to the lungs by 15%. Total energy imparted (unshielded/shielded) was 88/86 mJ for computed tomography (CT) brain, 64/60 mJ for CT cervical spine, and 289/260 mJ for CT chest scanning. An increase in image noise could be observed in the ranges were bismuth shielding was applied. The observed reduction of organ dose and total energy imparted could be achieved more efficiently by a reduction of tube current. The application of in-plane selective shielding is therefore discouraged. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68832565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19482483</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctq3TAQhkVpaU7TPkA3RVDozu3oYtlelpBeIFACyVrIupzjYFuORg6cp-grR-45UOimqwHNN__Mr5-Q9ww-M4DmCwIIARWAqoCzpuIvyI5JwSsGrXxJdtCJtmq6Tl6QN4gPANAx2bwmF0wpKJzYkd-3q5nzkE0enjw1iB5x8nOmMVD0o7d_3oe5WkYze4qHwY9umPdbPw-Iq8fSpTZOy5q9ozlOcZ_McjjSfEhx3R-ofzLjWvTjvA2ZHmPqC-kiloWzo8Nk9p4-rmYc8vEteRXMiP7duV6S-2_Xd1c_qptf339efb2prOQyV0EEK4KStQcrG9NZUfyIWjhVc7C2Y9652kJQzJiet65TDgwo2zsWgvNcXJJPJ90lxcdiIutpQOvHzWVcUau2FbxW9X9B1smWy1YU8OM_4ENc01xMaMF4I5liHRSKnSibImLyQS-pfEA6agZ6C1WfQtUlVL2FqrdbP5yV137y7u_EOUXxDJDXoEk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3127416190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Geleijns, J ; Salvadó Artells, M ; Veldkamp, W J H ; López Tortosa, M ; Calzado Cantera, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Geleijns, J ; Salvadó Artells, M ; Veldkamp, W J H ; López Tortosa, M ; Calzado Cantera, A</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed at assessment of efficacy of selective in-plane shielding in adults by quantitative evaluation of the achieved dose reduction and image quality. Commercially available accessories for in-plane shielding of the eye lens, thyroid and breast, and an anthropomorphic phantom were used for the evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Organ dose and total energy imparted were assessed by means of a Monte Carlo technique taking into account tube voltage, tube current, and scanner type. Image quality was quantified as noise in soft tissue. Application of the lens shield reduced dose to the lens by 27% and to the brain by 1%. The thyroid shield reduced thyroid dose by 26%; the breast shield reduced dose to the breasts by 30% and to the lungs by 15%. Total energy imparted (unshielded/shielded) was 88/86 mJ for computed tomography (CT) brain, 64/60 mJ for CT cervical spine, and 289/260 mJ for CT chest scanning. An increase in image noise could be observed in the ranges were bismuth shielding was applied. The observed reduction of organ dose and total energy imparted could be achieved more efficiently by a reduction of tube current. The application of in-plane selective shielding is therefore discouraged.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16604323</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Bismuth ; Brain ; Breast ; Computed tomography ; Eye lens ; Humans ; Image quality ; Lenses ; Medical imaging ; Monte Carlo Method ; Neuroimaging ; Noise reduction ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Quality assessment ; Quantitative analysis ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Protection - methods ; Shielding ; Soft tissues ; Spine ; Spine (cervical) ; Thyroid ; Thyroid gland ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2334-2340</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2006.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16604323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geleijns, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvadó Artells, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, W J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López Tortosa, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzado Cantera, A</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>This study aimed at assessment of efficacy of selective in-plane shielding in adults by quantitative evaluation of the achieved dose reduction and image quality. Commercially available accessories for in-plane shielding of the eye lens, thyroid and breast, and an anthropomorphic phantom were used for the evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Organ dose and total energy imparted were assessed by means of a Monte Carlo technique taking into account tube voltage, tube current, and scanner type. Image quality was quantified as noise in soft tissue. Application of the lens shield reduced dose to the lens by 27% and to the brain by 1%. The thyroid shield reduced thyroid dose by 26%; the breast shield reduced dose to the breasts by 30% and to the lungs by 15%. Total energy imparted (unshielded/shielded) was 88/86 mJ for computed tomography (CT) brain, 64/60 mJ for CT cervical spine, and 289/260 mJ for CT chest scanning. An increase in image noise could be observed in the ranges were bismuth shielding was applied. The observed reduction of organ dose and total energy imparted could be achieved more efficiently by a reduction of tube current. The application of in-plane selective shielding is therefore discouraged.</description><subject>Bismuth</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Eye lens</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Neuroimaging</subject><subject>Noise reduction</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Protection - methods</subject><subject>Shielding</subject><subject>Soft tissues</subject><subject>Spine</subject><subject>Spine (cervical)</subject><subject>Thyroid</subject><subject>Thyroid gland</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkctq3TAQhkVpaU7TPkA3RVDozu3oYtlelpBeIFACyVrIupzjYFuORg6cp-grR-45UOimqwHNN__Mr5-Q9ww-M4DmCwIIARWAqoCzpuIvyI5JwSsGrXxJdtCJtmq6Tl6QN4gPANAx2bwmF0wpKJzYkd-3q5nzkE0enjw1iB5x8nOmMVD0o7d_3oe5WkYze4qHwY9umPdbPw-Iq8fSpTZOy5q9ozlOcZ_McjjSfEhx3R-ofzLjWvTjvA2ZHmPqC-kiloWzo8Nk9p4-rmYc8vEteRXMiP7duV6S-2_Xd1c_qptf339efb2prOQyV0EEK4KStQcrG9NZUfyIWjhVc7C2Y9652kJQzJiet65TDgwo2zsWgvNcXJJPJ90lxcdiIutpQOvHzWVcUau2FbxW9X9B1smWy1YU8OM_4ENc01xMaMF4I5liHRSKnSibImLyQS-pfEA6agZ6C1WfQtUlVL2FqrdbP5yV137y7u_EOUXxDJDXoEk</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Geleijns, J</creator><creator>Salvadó Artells, M</creator><creator>Veldkamp, W J H</creator><creator>López Tortosa, M</creator><creator>Calzado Cantera, A</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality</title><author>Geleijns, J ; Salvadó Artells, M ; Veldkamp, W J H ; López Tortosa, M ; Calzado Cantera, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bismuth</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Eye lens</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Neuroimaging</topic><topic>Noise reduction</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Protection - methods</topic><topic>Shielding</topic><topic>Soft tissues</topic><topic>Spine</topic><topic>Spine (cervical)</topic><topic>Thyroid</topic><topic>Thyroid gland</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geleijns, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvadó Artells, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, W J H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López Tortosa, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzado Cantera, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geleijns, J</au><au>Salvadó Artells, M</au><au>Veldkamp, W J H</au><au>López Tortosa, M</au><au>Calzado Cantera, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2334</spage><epage>2340</epage><pages>2334-2340</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>This study aimed at assessment of efficacy of selective in-plane shielding in adults by quantitative evaluation of the achieved dose reduction and image quality. Commercially available accessories for in-plane shielding of the eye lens, thyroid and breast, and an anthropomorphic phantom were used for the evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality. Organ dose and total energy imparted were assessed by means of a Monte Carlo technique taking into account tube voltage, tube current, and scanner type. Image quality was quantified as noise in soft tissue. Application of the lens shield reduced dose to the lens by 27% and to the brain by 1%. The thyroid shield reduced thyroid dose by 26%; the breast shield reduced dose to the breasts by 30% and to the lungs by 15%. Total energy imparted (unshielded/shielded) was 88/86 mJ for computed tomography (CT) brain, 64/60 mJ for CT cervical spine, and 289/260 mJ for CT chest scanning. An increase in image noise could be observed in the ranges were bismuth shielding was applied. The observed reduction of organ dose and total energy imparted could be achieved more efficiently by a reduction of tube current. The application of in-plane selective shielding is therefore discouraged.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>16604323</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
ispartof | European radiology, 2006-10, Vol.16 (10), p.2334-2340 |
issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68832565 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Bismuth Brain Breast Computed tomography Eye lens Humans Image quality Lenses Medical imaging Monte Carlo Method Neuroimaging Noise reduction Phantoms, Imaging Quality assessment Quantitative analysis Radiation Dosage Radiation Protection - methods Shielding Soft tissues Spine Spine (cervical) Thyroid Thyroid gland Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
title | Quantitative assessment of selective in-plane shielding of tissues in computed tomography through evaluation of absorbed dose and image quality |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T13%3A37%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20assessment%20of%20selective%20in-plane%20shielding%20of%20tissues%20in%20computed%20tomography%20through%20evaluation%20of%20absorbed%20dose%20and%20image%20quality&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Geleijns,%20J&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2334&rft.epage=2340&rft.pages=2334-2340&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-006-0217-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19482483%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-f3fc3f645e0c47a9c3043353d6520cc91edd5c0f61aab28d96d0a06cbd1ffde23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3127416190&rft_id=info:pmid/16604323&rfr_iscdi=true |