Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values

In most situations, simple techniques for handling missing data (such as complete case analysis, overall mean imputation, and the missing-indicator method) produce biased results, whereas imputation techniques yield valid results without complicating the analysis once the imputations are carried out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of clinical epidemiology 2006-10, Vol.59 (10), p.1087-1091
Main Authors: Donders, A. Rogier T., van der Heijden, Geert J.M.G., Stijnen, Theo, Moons, Karel G.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Bias
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Epidemiology
Humans
Indicator method
Logistic Models
Methods
Missing data
Multiple imputation
Precision
R&D
Research & development
Research Design
Single imputation
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In most situations, simple techniques for handling missing data (such as complete case analysis, overall mean imputation, and the missing-indicator method) produce biased results, whereas imputation techniques yield valid results without complicating the analysis once the imputations are carried out. Imputation techniques are based on the idea that any subject in a study sample can be replaced by a new randomly chosen subject from the same source population. Imputation of missing data on a variable is replacing that missing by a value that is drawn from an estimate of the distribution of this variable. In single imputation, only one estimate is used. In multiple imputation, various estimates are used, reflecting the uncertainty in the estimation of this distribution. Under the general conditions of so-called missing at random and missing completely at random, both single and multiple imputations result in unbiased estimates of study associations. But single imputation results in too small estimated standard errors, whereas multiple imputation results in correctly estimated standard errors and confidence intervals. In this article we explain why all this is the case, and use a simple simulation study to demonstrate our explanations. We also explain and illustrate why two frequently used methods to handle missing data, i.e., overall mean imputation and the missing-indicator method, almost always result in biased estimates.
ISSN:0895-4356
1878-5921
DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014