Influence of Learning Resources on Study Time and Achievement Scores in a Problem-Based Curriculum

Many aspects of the problem-based learning cycle aim at stimulating students to elaborate on their knowledge. This elaborative process is considered to be one of the most effective study aids for learning and applying information. One of the opportunities to stimulate this elaboration process is by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice 2006-11, Vol.11 (4), p.381-389
Main Authors: Te Winkel, Wilco, Rikers, Remy, Loyens, Sofie, Schmidt, Henk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic Achievement
Achievement Gains
Educational Measurement
Educational Resources
Health Personnel - education
Humans
Instructional Materials
Learning Processes
Problem Based Learning
Problem-Based Learning - organization & administration
Scores
Student Attitudes
Students
Teaching Materials
Teaching Methods
Universities
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many aspects of the problem-based learning cycle aim at stimulating students to elaborate on their knowledge. This elaborative process is considered to be one of the most effective study aids for learning and applying information. One of the opportunities to stimulate this elaboration process is by offering students more, and more diverse, learning resources. Under laboratory conditions, increasing the richness and diversity of the learning materials has often been shown to support students in learning, remembering and applying information. In this study, a curricular perspective was adopted on the question whether students would benefit from more learning resources. Mean study times and achievement scores for 28 problem-based courses were calculated and included in the analyses. Independent variables in both analyses were the number of primary learning resources (i.e., resources students were recommended to study) and the number of supplementary resources (i.e., related, but non-essential resources). Results showed a significant increase in achievement scores for courses with more primary learning resources, but the effect of supplementary resources was limited.
ISSN:1382-4996
1573-1677
DOI:10.1007/s10459-006-9016-4