Loading…

Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis

Objectives  To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design  Retrospective case study. Setting  Tertiary referral centre. Population  A total of 149 consecutive women...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50
Main Authors: Hewitt, MJ, Anderson, K, Hall, GD, Weston, M, Hutson, R, Wilkinson, N, Perren, TJ, Lane, G, Spencer, JA
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733
container_end_page 50
container_issue 1
container_start_page 46
container_title BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
container_volume 114
creator Hewitt, MJ
Anderson, K
Hall, GD
Weston, M
Hutson, R
Wilkinson, N
Perren, TJ
Lane, G
Spencer, JA
description Objectives  To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design  Retrospective case study. Setting  Tertiary referral centre. Population  A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB. Methods  Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry. Main outcome measures  The rate of site‐specific diagnosis. Results  A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer. Conclusions  IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68933754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68933754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERT_gFZCFBLcEfyS2g8QBKgpUlXoBcbS89mTxktjBTrTdWx-BZ-yTkHRXVOoJXzzS_P6j0fwQwpSUdH5vNyWtJC1IzVTJCBEloVSK8uYJOvnXeHpfk4Jwpo7Rac4bQqhghD9Dx1QyzlXdnKDbH7GHgLd-_IkHSH6MAUyHrUnWh9ibMWafcWzxFH6FuA04Jr_24R2GtvXW2N3S871Zw93tn_XkHTi88nHIOzxG7GCE1PsAOPtxIfIA1s9B7LxZh2X2c3TUmi7Di8N_hr5ffPp2_qW4uv789fzDVWErWYnCVI44WBHi6orVIIyhqlHOUqMYk4QLAEetUoISzg1nzIEiVCprmDRKcn6G3uznDin-niCPuvfZQteZAHHKWqiGc1lXM_jqEbiJUwrzbpqxWlDBaTNDag_ZFHNO0OohzVdIO02JXhTpjV5M6MWEXhTpe0X6Zo6-PMyfVj24h-DByQy8PgAmW9O1yQTr8wOnKiXrhs7c-z239R3s_nsB_fHyeqn4XzoSr7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225616319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</creator><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives  To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design  Retrospective case study. Setting  Tertiary referral centre. Population  A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB. Methods  Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry. Main outcome measures  The rate of site‐specific diagnosis. Results  A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer. Conclusions  IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17233859</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Biopsy, Needle - standards ; Cancer ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Computed tomography guidance ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gynecology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Membranes ; Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology ; ovarian cancer ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology ; peritoneum neoplasms ; Radiography, Interventional - standards ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards ; ultrasound guided guidance ; Women</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50</ispartof><rights>RCOG 2007 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 The Authors Journal compilation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18487591$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17233859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, TJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objectives  To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design  Retrospective case study. Setting  Tertiary referral centre. Population  A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB. Methods  Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry. Main outcome measures  The rate of site‐specific diagnosis. Results  A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer. Conclusions  IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - standards</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Computed tomography guidance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>peritoneum neoplasms</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional - standards</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards</subject><subject>ultrasound guided guidance</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERT_gFZCFBLcEfyS2g8QBKgpUlXoBcbS89mTxktjBTrTdWx-BZ-yTkHRXVOoJXzzS_P6j0fwQwpSUdH5vNyWtJC1IzVTJCBEloVSK8uYJOvnXeHpfk4Jwpo7Rac4bQqhghD9Dx1QyzlXdnKDbH7GHgLd-_IkHSH6MAUyHrUnWh9ibMWafcWzxFH6FuA04Jr_24R2GtvXW2N3S871Zw93tn_XkHTi88nHIOzxG7GCE1PsAOPtxIfIA1s9B7LxZh2X2c3TUmi7Di8N_hr5ffPp2_qW4uv789fzDVWErWYnCVI44WBHi6orVIIyhqlHOUqMYk4QLAEetUoISzg1nzIEiVCprmDRKcn6G3uznDin-niCPuvfZQteZAHHKWqiGc1lXM_jqEbiJUwrzbpqxWlDBaTNDag_ZFHNO0OohzVdIO02JXhTpjV5M6MWEXhTpe0X6Zo6-PMyfVj24h-DByQy8PgAmW9O1yQTr8wOnKiXrhs7c-z239R3s_nsB_fHyeqn4XzoSr7M</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Hewitt, MJ</creator><creator>Anderson, K</creator><creator>Hall, GD</creator><creator>Weston, M</creator><creator>Hutson, R</creator><creator>Wilkinson, N</creator><creator>Perren, TJ</creator><creator>Lane, G</creator><creator>Spencer, JA</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><author>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - standards</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Computed tomography guidance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>peritoneum neoplasms</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional - standards</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards</topic><topic>ultrasound guided guidance</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, TJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hewitt, MJ</au><au>Anderson, K</au><au>Hall, GD</au><au>Weston, M</au><au>Hutson, R</au><au>Wilkinson, N</au><au>Perren, TJ</au><au>Lane, G</au><au>Spencer, JA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>46-50</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objectives  To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design  Retrospective case study. Setting  Tertiary referral centre. Population  A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB. Methods  Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry. Main outcome measures  The rate of site‐specific diagnosis. Results  A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer. Conclusions  IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17233859</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-0328
ispartof BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50
issn 1470-0328
1471-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68933754
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Abdomen
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Biopsy, Needle - methods
Biopsy, Needle - standards
Cancer
Carcinoma - pathology
Computed tomography guidance
Female
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gynecology
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Medical diagnosis
Medical sciences
Membranes
Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology
ovarian cancer
Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology
peritoneum neoplasms
Radiography, Interventional - standards
Retrospective Studies
Stomach
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
Tumors
Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards
ultrasound guided guidance
Women
title Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20with%20peritoneal%20carcinomatosis%20of%20unknown%20origin:%20efficacy%20of%20image%E2%80%90guided%20biopsy%20to%20determine%20site%E2%80%90specific%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Hewitt,%20MJ&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=46-50&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68933754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225616319&rft_id=info:pmid/17233859&rfr_iscdi=true