Loading…
Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis
Objectives To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Study design Retrospective case study. Setting Tertiary referral centre. Population A total of 149 consecutive women...
Saved in:
Published in: | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733 |
container_end_page | 50 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 46 |
container_title | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology |
container_volume | 114 |
creator | Hewitt, MJ Anderson, K Hall, GD Weston, M Hutson, R Wilkinson, N Perren, TJ Lane, G Spencer, JA |
description | Objectives To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).
Study design Retrospective case study.
Setting Tertiary referral centre.
Population A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB.
Methods Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry.
Main outcome measures The rate of site‐specific diagnosis.
Results A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer.
Conclusions IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68933754</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68933754</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERT_gFZCFBLcEfyS2g8QBKgpUlXoBcbS89mTxktjBTrTdWx-BZ-yTkHRXVOoJXzzS_P6j0fwQwpSUdH5vNyWtJC1IzVTJCBEloVSK8uYJOvnXeHpfk4Jwpo7Rac4bQqhghD9Dx1QyzlXdnKDbH7GHgLd-_IkHSH6MAUyHrUnWh9ibMWafcWzxFH6FuA04Jr_24R2GtvXW2N3S871Zw93tn_XkHTi88nHIOzxG7GCE1PsAOPtxIfIA1s9B7LxZh2X2c3TUmi7Di8N_hr5ffPp2_qW4uv789fzDVWErWYnCVI44WBHi6orVIIyhqlHOUqMYk4QLAEetUoISzg1nzIEiVCprmDRKcn6G3uznDin-niCPuvfZQteZAHHKWqiGc1lXM_jqEbiJUwrzbpqxWlDBaTNDag_ZFHNO0OohzVdIO02JXhTpjV5M6MWEXhTpe0X6Zo6-PMyfVj24h-DByQy8PgAmW9O1yQTr8wOnKiXrhs7c-z239R3s_nsB_fHyeqn4XzoSr7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>225616319</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</creator><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).
Study design Retrospective case study.
Setting Tertiary referral centre.
Population A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB.
Methods Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry.
Main outcome measures The rate of site‐specific diagnosis.
Results A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer.
Conclusions IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-0328</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17233859</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BIOGFQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Biopsy, Needle - methods ; Biopsy, Needle - standards ; Cancer ; Carcinoma - pathology ; Computed tomography guidance ; Female ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Gynecology ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Membranes ; Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology ; ovarian cancer ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology ; peritoneum neoplasms ; Radiography, Interventional - standards ; Retrospective Studies ; Stomach ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards ; Tumors ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards ; ultrasound guided guidance ; Women</subject><ispartof>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50</ispartof><rights>RCOG 2007 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2007 The Authors Journal compilation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18487591$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17233859$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, TJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><title>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</title><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).
Study design Retrospective case study.
Setting Tertiary referral centre.
Population A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB.
Methods Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry.
Main outcome measures The rate of site‐specific diagnosis.
Results A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer.
Conclusions IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy, Needle - standards</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Computed tomography guidance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology</subject><subject>ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>peritoneum neoplasms</subject><subject>Radiography, Interventional - standards</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards</subject><subject>ultrasound guided guidance</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1470-0328</issn><issn>1471-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQxy1ERT_gFZCFBLcEfyS2g8QBKgpUlXoBcbS89mTxktjBTrTdWx-BZ-yTkHRXVOoJXzzS_P6j0fwQwpSUdH5vNyWtJC1IzVTJCBEloVSK8uYJOvnXeHpfk4Jwpo7Rac4bQqhghD9Dx1QyzlXdnKDbH7GHgLd-_IkHSH6MAUyHrUnWh9ibMWafcWzxFH6FuA04Jr_24R2GtvXW2N3S871Zw93tn_XkHTi88nHIOzxG7GCE1PsAOPtxIfIA1s9B7LxZh2X2c3TUmi7Di8N_hr5ffPp2_qW4uv789fzDVWErWYnCVI44WBHi6orVIIyhqlHOUqMYk4QLAEetUoISzg1nzIEiVCprmDRKcn6G3uznDin-niCPuvfZQteZAHHKWqiGc1lXM_jqEbiJUwrzbpqxWlDBaTNDag_ZFHNO0OohzVdIO02JXhTpjV5M6MWEXhTpe0X6Zo6-PMyfVj24h-DByQy8PgAmW9O1yQTr8wOnKiXrhs7c-z239R3s_nsB_fHyeqn4XzoSr7M</recordid><startdate>200701</startdate><enddate>200701</enddate><creator>Hewitt, MJ</creator><creator>Anderson, K</creator><creator>Hall, GD</creator><creator>Weston, M</creator><creator>Hutson, R</creator><creator>Wilkinson, N</creator><creator>Perren, TJ</creator><creator>Lane, G</creator><creator>Spencer, JA</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200701</creationdate><title>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</title><author>Hewitt, MJ ; Anderson, K ; Hall, GD ; Weston, M ; Hutson, R ; Wilkinson, N ; Perren, TJ ; Lane, G ; Spencer, JA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy, Needle - standards</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Computed tomography guidance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology</topic><topic>ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>peritoneum neoplasms</topic><topic>Radiography, Interventional - standards</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards</topic><topic>ultrasound guided guidance</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hewitt, MJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, GD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weston, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutson, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilkinson, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perren, TJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lane, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, JA</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hewitt, MJ</au><au>Anderson, K</au><au>Hall, GD</au><au>Weston, M</au><au>Hutson, R</au><au>Wilkinson, N</au><au>Perren, TJ</au><au>Lane, G</au><au>Spencer, JA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>BJOG</addtitle><date>2007-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>114</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>46</spage><epage>50</epage><pages>46-50</pages><issn>1470-0328</issn><eissn>1471-0528</eissn><coden>BIOGFQ</coden><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the use of image‐guided biopsy (IGB) in routine clinical practice to obtain site‐specific diagnoses in women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).
Study design Retrospective case study.
Setting Tertiary referral centre.
Population A total of 149 consecutive women with PC who underwent IGB.
Methods Biopsy was performed in women considered unsuitable for primary surgery because of poor performance status or disease unlikely to be optimally debulked, with a prior history of malignancy or where there was clinicoradiological uncertainty about primary tumour site. Standard haematoxylin–eosin histological analysis was supplemented with immunohistochemistry.
Main outcome measures The rate of site‐specific diagnosis.
Results A total of 149 women underwent IGB using computed tomography or ultrasound over a 6‐year period. The only complication was one rectus sheath haematoma. In 138 (93%) women, a site‐specific cancer diagnosis was made on the IGB (including 111 müllerian tract, 8 gastrointestinal tract, 4 breast and 3 lymphoma); in ten women, a repeat biopsy was necessary, giving an overall failure rate of 7%. In a further six women, malignancy was confirmed but a site‐specific diagnosis could not be made, and in four women, biopsy showed benign tissue. A site‐specific diagnosis was obtained in 29 of the 32 women (94%) with previous malignancy, of which 18/32 (56%) showed a new primary cancer.
Conclusions IGB is a safe and accurate technique for providing site‐specific diagnoses in women with PC in routine clinical practice, including those with a previous relevant malignancy. IGB can replace laparoscopic or open biopsy in defining primary therapeutic options. The data would suggest that the biopsy should be performed with ultrasound where feasible.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>17233859</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-0328 |
ispartof | BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2007-01, Vol.114 (1), p.46-50 |
issn | 1470-0328 1471-0528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68933754 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Abdomen Biological and medical sciences Biopsy Biopsy, Needle - methods Biopsy, Needle - standards Cancer Carcinoma - pathology Computed tomography guidance Female Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gynecology Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Medical diagnosis Medical sciences Membranes Neoplasms, Unknown Primary - pathology ovarian cancer Peritoneal Neoplasms - pathology peritoneum neoplasms Radiography, Interventional - standards Retrospective Studies Stomach Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards Tumors Ultrasonography, Interventional - standards ultrasound guided guidance Women |
title | Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image‐guided biopsy to determine site‐specific diagnosis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A49%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%20with%20peritoneal%20carcinomatosis%20of%20unknown%20origin:%20efficacy%20of%20image%E2%80%90guided%20biopsy%20to%20determine%20site%E2%80%90specific%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=BJOG%20:%20an%20international%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynaecology&rft.au=Hewitt,%20MJ&rft.date=2007-01&rft.volume=114&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=46&rft.epage=50&rft.pages=46-50&rft.issn=1470-0328&rft.eissn=1471-0528&rft.coden=BIOGFQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01176.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68933754%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4746-a4d0deb00d5425e6aa1898dc1a8227036eed1c8861033a322de80178ca27a8733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=225616319&rft_id=info:pmid/17233859&rfr_iscdi=true |