Loading…

Periosteal margin in soft‐tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND. Soft‐tissue sarcomas frequently rest in contact with bone. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the risk of local recurrence for sarcomas adjacent to bone and to determine whether the periosteum provides an adequate margin of resection. METHODS. Fifty patients with soft‐tissue sarcom...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer 2007-02, Vol.109 (3), p.598-602
Main Authors: Lin, Patrick P., Pino, Eduardo Diaz, Normand, Anne N., Deavers, Michael T., Cannon, Christopher P., Ballo, Matthew T., Pisters, Peter W.T., Pollock, Raphael E., Lewis, Valerae O., Zagars, Gunar K., Yasko, Alan W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND. Soft‐tissue sarcomas frequently rest in contact with bone. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the risk of local recurrence for sarcomas adjacent to bone and to determine whether the periosteum provides an adequate margin of resection. METHODS. Fifty patients with soft‐tissue sarcomas abutting bone were treated at a single institution between 1990 and 2004. All patients had high‐grade, T2 (>5 cm), nonmetastatic disease in the lower extremity. Bone contact was verified by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or computed tomography (CT) scans. Forty‐three of 50 patients received preoperative radiation with a mean dose of 50 Gy. In 11 cases a composite resection of bone and soft tissue was performed. In 39 cases the excision involved only soft tissue. RESULTS. True bone invasion was verified by histopathologic examination in 3 of 50 cases (6%). Local recurrence in the soft tissues developed in 8 of 50 (16%) patients. In no case did the recurrence involve destruction of cortical bone or erosion into bone. The recurrent tumor resided against the region of previous bone contact in 1 of 8 cases. There was no statistically significant difference in local recurrence between patients who had composite bone resection and patients who had soft‐tissue resection only (P = .87). CONCLUSIONS. Relatively few sarcomas are able to penetrate cortical bone. Composite bone and soft‐tissue resections are indicated primarily for frank bone invasion. In the absence of this, the periosteum is an adequate surgical margin for sarcomas treated with wide excision and radiation. Cancer 2007;109:598–602. © 2006 American Cancer Society. Fifty patients with deep, high‐grade, T2 soft‐tissue sarcomas abutting bone were analyzed retrospectively for recurrence in bone. The periosteum is an adequate margin in the large majority of cases, and composite bone/soft‐tissue resections are recommended only for frank bone invasion.
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.22429