Loading…
Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL
Objectives Data have suggested benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major reason for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL. If this hypothesis were correct, within these ranges, a smaller prostate volume would be a stronger predictor of cancer than...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2007, Vol.69 (1), p.103-107 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513 |
container_end_page | 107 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Al-Azab, Rami Toi, Ants Lockwood, Gina Kulkarni, Girish S Fleshner, Neil |
description | Objectives Data have suggested benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major reason for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL. If this hypothesis were correct, within these ranges, a smaller prostate volume would be a stronger predictor of cancer than the PSA level itself (the relative contribution from cancer is greater in smaller glands). Methods We examined our institutional data set of transrectal ultrasound-guided procedures from 2000 to 2003. We studied patients who presented for their first prostate biopsy with a PSA level of 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL. The indications for biopsy were elevated age-specific PSA level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Other covariates included patient age, abnormal transrectal ultrasound findings, transrectal ultrasound volume, and biopsy sampling scheme. Univariate analyses were used to assess the association between each variable and cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was then used to determine the adjusted risk factors for cancer at biopsy. Results On univariate analyses, all measured covariates were predictive of cancer. On multivariate modeling, the significant risk factors (in order of strength) for positive biopsy findings were smaller prostate volume (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68976176</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090429506021650</els_id><sourcerecordid>68976176</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIREPhEUDewG6mx56xZ7wBtQFKpUhUStutZXwJDhM7tT1UeSZeEkeJWokNK-tY37n9_6mqtxgaDJidrZsphjGsdg0BYA3wBjr8rJphSvqac06fVzMADnVHOD2pXqW0hgIy1r-sTnBPemBkmFV_rmNIWWaD7sI4bQy6SmiZY_ArkzK6jkY7lUNEwaK59MpE9NnJlQ_JJSQzuonSp2hUliO6HXOUKUxe15eT00ajx9oXLmzTDj24_PPxs15ujXLWKXTus1sZj-7kOJmELkx-MCUkDSDpNSqbIb862yxeVy-sHJN5c3xPq9uvX27m3-rF98ur-fmiVl035FoTKrsWDOihVS2llre2ByytlpyQEpAWKKeaWYV1zzroqRw6a1jbttxS3J5WHw51tzHcl4my2LikzDhKb8KUBBt4z3DPCkgPoCo7FRms2Ea3kXEnMIi9S2Itji6JvUsCuCgulbx3xwbTj43RT1lHWwrw_gjIpORoi8rKpSduoBgXWwv36cCZIsdvZ6JIyplik3Z7U4QO7r-jfPynghqdd6XpL7MzaR2m6IvWAotEBIjl_qT2FwUMCGYU2r8KLclV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68976176</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Al-Azab, Rami ; Toi, Ants ; Lockwood, Gina ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Fleshner, Neil</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Azab, Rami ; Toi, Ants ; Lockwood, Gina ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Fleshner, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Data have suggested benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major reason for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL. If this hypothesis were correct, within these ranges, a smaller prostate volume would be a stronger predictor of cancer than the PSA level itself (the relative contribution from cancer is greater in smaller glands). Methods We examined our institutional data set of transrectal ultrasound-guided procedures from 2000 to 2003. We studied patients who presented for their first prostate biopsy with a PSA level of 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL. The indications for biopsy were elevated age-specific PSA level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Other covariates included patient age, abnormal transrectal ultrasound findings, transrectal ultrasound volume, and biopsy sampling scheme. Univariate analyses were used to assess the association between each variable and cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was then used to determine the adjusted risk factors for cancer at biopsy. Results On univariate analyses, all measured covariates were predictive of cancer. On multivariate modeling, the significant risk factors (in order of strength) for positive biopsy findings were smaller prostate volume (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, P <0.001), increasing age (OR 1.72, P <0.001), increasing PSA (OR 1.64, P <0.001), and the presence of hypoechoic lesions (OR 2.42, P <0.001). Conclusions When the PSA level is in the 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL range, a smaller prostate volume is the strongest predictor of cancer detection. These data support previous studies suggesting the amount of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major factor responsible for elevated PSA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17270628</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URGYAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases ; Organ Size ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - blood ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectum ; Ultrasonography ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2007, Vol.69 (1), p.103-107</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18511295$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17270628$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Azab, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Ants</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Girish S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleshner, Neil</creatorcontrib><title>Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>Objectives Data have suggested benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major reason for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL. If this hypothesis were correct, within these ranges, a smaller prostate volume would be a stronger predictor of cancer than the PSA level itself (the relative contribution from cancer is greater in smaller glands). Methods We examined our institutional data set of transrectal ultrasound-guided procedures from 2000 to 2003. We studied patients who presented for their first prostate biopsy with a PSA level of 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL. The indications for biopsy were elevated age-specific PSA level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Other covariates included patient age, abnormal transrectal ultrasound findings, transrectal ultrasound volume, and biopsy sampling scheme. Univariate analyses were used to assess the association between each variable and cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was then used to determine the adjusted risk factors for cancer at biopsy. Results On univariate analyses, all measured covariates were predictive of cancer. On multivariate modeling, the significant risk factors (in order of strength) for positive biopsy findings were smaller prostate volume (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, P <0.001), increasing age (OR 1.72, P <0.001), increasing PSA (OR 1.64, P <0.001), and the presence of hypoechoic lesions (OR 2.42, P <0.001). Conclusions When the PSA level is in the 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL range, a smaller prostate volume is the strongest predictor of cancer detection. These data support previous studies suggesting the amount of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major factor responsible for elevated PSA.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</subject><subject>Organ Size</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkstuEzEUhkcIREPhEUDewG6mx56xZ7wBtQFKpUhUStutZXwJDhM7tT1UeSZeEkeJWokNK-tY37n9_6mqtxgaDJidrZsphjGsdg0BYA3wBjr8rJphSvqac06fVzMADnVHOD2pXqW0hgIy1r-sTnBPemBkmFV_rmNIWWaD7sI4bQy6SmiZY_ArkzK6jkY7lUNEwaK59MpE9NnJlQ_JJSQzuonSp2hUliO6HXOUKUxe15eT00ajx9oXLmzTDj24_PPxs15ujXLWKXTus1sZj-7kOJmELkx-MCUkDSDpNSqbIb862yxeVy-sHJN5c3xPq9uvX27m3-rF98ur-fmiVl035FoTKrsWDOihVS2llre2ByytlpyQEpAWKKeaWYV1zzroqRw6a1jbttxS3J5WHw51tzHcl4my2LikzDhKb8KUBBt4z3DPCkgPoCo7FRms2Ea3kXEnMIi9S2Itji6JvUsCuCgulbx3xwbTj43RT1lHWwrw_gjIpORoi8rKpSduoBgXWwv36cCZIsdvZ6JIyplik3Z7U4QO7r-jfPynghqdd6XpL7MzaR2m6IvWAotEBIjl_qT2FwUMCGYU2r8KLclV</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Al-Azab, Rami</creator><creator>Toi, Ants</creator><creator>Lockwood, Gina</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Girish S</creator><creator>Fleshner, Neil</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL</title><author>Al-Azab, Rami ; Toi, Ants ; Lockwood, Gina ; Kulkarni, Girish S ; Fleshner, Neil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases</topic><topic>Organ Size</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Azab, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toi, Ants</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Gina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Girish S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleshner, Neil</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Azab, Rami</au><au>Toi, Ants</au><au>Lockwood, Gina</au><au>Kulkarni, Girish S</au><au>Fleshner, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>103-107</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><coden>URGYAZ</coden><abstract>Objectives Data have suggested benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major reason for elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL. If this hypothesis were correct, within these ranges, a smaller prostate volume would be a stronger predictor of cancer than the PSA level itself (the relative contribution from cancer is greater in smaller glands). Methods We examined our institutional data set of transrectal ultrasound-guided procedures from 2000 to 2003. We studied patients who presented for their first prostate biopsy with a PSA level of 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL. The indications for biopsy were elevated age-specific PSA level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings. Other covariates included patient age, abnormal transrectal ultrasound findings, transrectal ultrasound volume, and biopsy sampling scheme. Univariate analyses were used to assess the association between each variable and cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was then used to determine the adjusted risk factors for cancer at biopsy. Results On univariate analyses, all measured covariates were predictive of cancer. On multivariate modeling, the significant risk factors (in order of strength) for positive biopsy findings were smaller prostate volume (odds ratio [OR] 0.26, P <0.001), increasing age (OR 1.72, P <0.001), increasing PSA (OR 1.64, P <0.001), and the presence of hypoechoic lesions (OR 2.42, P <0.001). Conclusions When the PSA level is in the 2.0 to 9.0 ng/mL range, a smaller prostate volume is the strongest predictor of cancer detection. These data support previous studies suggesting the amount of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and not cancer, as the major factor responsible for elevated PSA.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17270628</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.041</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4295 |
ispartof | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2007, Vol.69 (1), p.103-107 |
issn | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_68976176 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Biopsy - methods Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases Organ Size Predictive Value of Tests Prostate - pathology Prostate-Specific Antigen - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - blood Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Rectum Ultrasonography Urology |
title | Prostate Volume Is Strongest Predictor of Cancer Diagnosis at Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy with Prostate-Specific Antigen Values Between 2.0 and 9.0 ng/mL |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T23%3A55%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prostate%20Volume%20Is%20Strongest%20Predictor%20of%20Cancer%20Diagnosis%20at%20Transrectal%20Ultrasound-Guided%20Prostate%20Biopsy%20with%20Prostate-Specific%20Antigen%20Values%20Between%202.0%20and%209.0%20ng/mL&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Al-Azab,%20Rami&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=103-107&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft.coden=URGYAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2006.09.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E68976176%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-d25a430e0d83c355f93f701afda92293f230595d6fc1d764075a84fe63339f513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68976176&rft_id=info:pmid/17270628&rfr_iscdi=true |