Self-Reported Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake among College Students

• Published in: Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) Md.), 2006-10, Vol.14 (10), p.1825-1831
• Main Authors: West, Delia Smith, Bursac, Zoran, Quimby, Donna, Prewitt, T. Elaine, Spatz, Thea, Nash, Creshelle, Mays, Glen, Eddings, Kenya
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: adolescents; Adult; African Americans - statistics & numerical data; Arkansas; Beverages; Calories; College students; Colleges & universities; Dietary Sucrose - administration & dosage; Energy drinks; Energy Intake - physiology; European Continental Ancestry Group - statistics & numerical data; Female; Fruit; Fruit juices; Humans; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Obesity; Overweight; Personal health; Public health; Questionnaires; Regression Analysis; Research methodology; Self report; Sex Factors; soda; Soft drinks; Sports drinks; Students - statistics & numerical data; sugar‐sweetened beverages; Surveys and Questionnaires; Teenagers; undergraduates; Universities; weight gain; Weight Gain - physiology
• ISSN: 1930-7381; 1930-739X
• DOI: 10.1038/oby.2006.210

Objective: To characterize sugar‐sweetened beverage intake of college students. Research Methods and Procedures: Undergraduates in an urban southern community campus were surveyed anonymously about sugared beverage consumption (soda, fruit drinks, energy drinks, sports drinks, sweet ice tea) in the past month. Results: Two hundred sixty‐five undergraduates responded (66% women, 46% minority, 100% of volunteers solicited). Most students (95%) reported sugared beverage intake in the past month, and 65% reported daily intake. Men were more likely than women to report daily intake (74% vs. 61%, p = 0.035). Soda was the most common sugar‐sweetened beverage. Black undergraduates reported higher sugared beverage intake than whites (p = 0.02), with 91% of blacks reporting sugar‐sweetened fruit drink intake in the past month and 50% reporting daily consumption. Mean estimated caloric intake from combined types of sugar‐sweetened beverages was significantly higher among black students than whites, 796 ± 941 vs. 397 ± 396 kcal/d (p = 0.0003); the primary source of sugar‐sweetened beverage calories among blacks was sugared fruit drinks (556 ± 918 kcal/d). Younger undergraduates reported significantly higher intake than older students (p = 0.025). Discussion: Self‐reported sugar‐sweetened beverage consumption among undergraduates is substantial and likely contributes considerable non‐nutritive calories, which may contribute to weight gain. Black undergraduates may be particularly vulnerable due to higher sugared beverage intake. Obesity prevention interventions targeting reductions in sugar‐sweetened beverages in this population merit consideration.