Loading…
Post hoc analysis and claims of superiority in the excel trial
[...]the conclusion is based on one post hoc exacerbation analysis performed during the last of three 8-week intervals, whereas seven other analyses of exacerbations showed no significant difference between treatments. Guidelines state that the minimum period for assessing exacerbations should be 6...
Saved in:
Published in: | Respiratory medicine 2007-03, Vol.101 (3), p.681-682 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [...]the conclusion is based on one post hoc exacerbation analysis performed during the last of three 8-week intervals, whereas seven other analyses of exacerbations showed no significant difference between treatments. Guidelines state that the minimum period for assessing exacerbations should be 6 months.3 These guidelines also suggest that changes in concomitant therapy, e.g. exacerbation treatment, can make outcomes less reliable over time. [...]it is essential for all data from the point of randomisation to be incorporated in any exacerbation rate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0954-6111 1532-3064 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.025 |