Loading…

Post hoc analysis and claims of superiority in the excel trial

[...]the conclusion is based on one post hoc exacerbation analysis performed during the last of three 8-week intervals, whereas seven other analyses of exacerbations showed no significant difference between treatments. Guidelines state that the minimum period for assessing exacerbations should be 6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory medicine 2007-03, Vol.101 (3), p.681-682
Main Authors: Naya, Ian P, Andersson, Tomas L.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:[...]the conclusion is based on one post hoc exacerbation analysis performed during the last of three 8-week intervals, whereas seven other analyses of exacerbations showed no significant difference between treatments. Guidelines state that the minimum period for assessing exacerbations should be 6 months.3 These guidelines also suggest that changes in concomitant therapy, e.g. exacerbation treatment, can make outcomes less reliable over time. [...]it is essential for all data from the point of randomisation to be incorporated in any exacerbation rate.
ISSN:0954-6111
1532-3064
DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.025