Loading…

Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers

We studied dairy cows (n=30) walking on concrete and on a soft, high-friction composite rubber surface to examine how flooring influenced gait and how this differed for cows with hoof lesions. Cows had hooves trimmed 9 wk after the trial and were classified as either with or without sole ulcers. Vid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of dairy science 2007-03, Vol.90 (3), p.1235-1242
Main Authors: Flower, F.C., de Passillé, A.M., Weary, D.M., Sanderson, D.J., Rushen, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83
container_end_page 1242
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1235
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 90
creator Flower, F.C.
de Passillé, A.M.
Weary, D.M.
Sanderson, D.J.
Rushen, J.
description We studied dairy cows (n=30) walking on concrete and on a soft, high-friction composite rubber surface to examine how flooring influenced gait and how this differed for cows with hoof lesions. Cows had hooves trimmed 9 wk after the trial and were classified as either with or without sole ulcers. Video recordings of the cows while walking were digitized using motion analysis software to calculate stride variables (length, height, overlap, duration, proportion of triple support, and speed). Gait was scored by a subjective scoring system (1 = sound to 5 = severely lame) and by a continuous visual analog scale for each of 7 gait attributes. Cows with sole ulcers walking on a composite rubber surface had longer strides (156.9±2.6 vs. 149.6±2.6cm), higher stride heights (9.7±0.3 vs. 8.8±0.3cm), more stride overlap (0.4±2.0 vs. −4.3±2.0cm), shorter periods of triple support (3 legs in ground contact; 68.6±2.0 vs. 73.8±2.0%), walked faster (1.22±0.04 vs. 1.17±0.04 m/s) and had lower overall gait scores (2.9±0.1 vs. 3.1±0.1), better tracking-up (19±2 vs. 24±2), better joint flexion (29±2 vs. 33±2), more symmetric steps (31±3 vs. 36±3), and less reluctance to bear weight on their legs (12±2 vs. 16±2) compared with walking on concrete. Similar results were found for cows without sole ulcers. Most of the subjective gait measures could distinguish between cows with and without sole ulcers, but this was not the case for kinematic measures other than stride height. Cows with higher gait scores (more severe lameness) showed the greatest improvement in stride length (r=−0.51), triple support (r=0.59), swing duration (r=−0.44), overall gait score (r=0.46), and reluctance to bear weight (r=0.66) when walking on the rubber surface compared with cows with lower gait scores. These results indicate that rubber flooring provides a more secure footing and is more comfortable to walk on, especially for lame cattle.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71612-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69005137</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030207716120</els_id><sourcerecordid>1261934271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6FTQKioJdb5KmSR9lcHYXFnyog48hTZOZDG2zJu0ufnszf3DAJ5-SC7977rnnIvSWwBUjlfyy69JVA0BpAQzoRxCfBKlIrp6gBeGUF4zU8ila_EUu0IuUdrkkFPhzdEEErQUBWKCmCW6y8TO-8ZutjcUqejP5MOJVH0L04wbfDvcxPNiEr7WfcHB4GR4T_umnLdZjd_iEecJN6C1e98bG9BI9c7pP9tXpvUTr1bcfy5vi7vv17fLrXWE4k1PRcmNrBmUFTnIG0lEKgoNpqwoqaMF1tbZCgLCUU-0IdQCyM8Zk911rJLtEH4662eCv2aZJDT4Z2_d6tGFOqqoBOGEig-_-AXdhjmP2pkjNJS9JCRmqj5CJIaVonbqPftDxtyKg9rGrHLs6xK72mSoQ6hC72ve-Pg2Y28F2585Tzhl4fwJ0Mrp3UY_GpzMnuSQlqc4rbfM5Hn20Kg2677Ms2Y-vsxNFKOMZfHMEnQ5Kb2IWWzcUCAMQpeA1ycTySNh8ggdvo0rG29HYLsuaSXXB_8dmfwAq8rXd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195854140</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Flower, F.C. ; de Passillé, A.M. ; Weary, D.M. ; Sanderson, D.J. ; Rushen, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Flower, F.C. ; de Passillé, A.M. ; Weary, D.M. ; Sanderson, D.J. ; Rushen, J.</creatorcontrib><description>We studied dairy cows (n=30) walking on concrete and on a soft, high-friction composite rubber surface to examine how flooring influenced gait and how this differed for cows with hoof lesions. Cows had hooves trimmed 9 wk after the trial and were classified as either with or without sole ulcers. Video recordings of the cows while walking were digitized using motion analysis software to calculate stride variables (length, height, overlap, duration, proportion of triple support, and speed). Gait was scored by a subjective scoring system (1 = sound to 5 = severely lame) and by a continuous visual analog scale for each of 7 gait attributes. Cows with sole ulcers walking on a composite rubber surface had longer strides (156.9±2.6 vs. 149.6±2.6cm), higher stride heights (9.7±0.3 vs. 8.8±0.3cm), more stride overlap (0.4±2.0 vs. −4.3±2.0cm), shorter periods of triple support (3 legs in ground contact; 68.6±2.0 vs. 73.8±2.0%), walked faster (1.22±0.04 vs. 1.17±0.04 m/s) and had lower overall gait scores (2.9±0.1 vs. 3.1±0.1), better tracking-up (19±2 vs. 24±2), better joint flexion (29±2 vs. 33±2), more symmetric steps (31±3 vs. 36±3), and less reluctance to bear weight on their legs (12±2 vs. 16±2) compared with walking on concrete. Similar results were found for cows without sole ulcers. Most of the subjective gait measures could distinguish between cows with and without sole ulcers, but this was not the case for kinematic measures other than stride height. Cows with higher gait scores (more severe lameness) showed the greatest improvement in stride length (r=−0.51), triple support (r=0.59), swing duration (r=−0.44), overall gait score (r=0.46), and reluctance to bear weight (r=0.66) when walking on the rubber surface compared with cows with lower gait scores. These results indicate that rubber flooring provides a more secure footing and is more comfortable to walk on, especially for lame cattle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71612-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17297100</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena - methods ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; dairy cattle ; dairy cows ; Dairying ; Female ; flooring ; floors ; Floors and Floorcoverings ; Food industries ; Foot Ulcer - prevention &amp; control ; Foot Ulcer - veterinary ; Friction ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gait ; Gait - physiology ; gait scores ; hardness ; Hoof and Claw - pathology ; hoof trimming ; hooves ; Housing, Animal ; image analysis ; lameness ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; Observation - methods ; Rubber ; sole ulcer ; sole ulcers ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2007-03, Vol.90 (3), p.1235-1242</ispartof><rights>2007 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Mar 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030207716120$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18581416$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17297100$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flower, F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Passillé, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weary, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rushen, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>We studied dairy cows (n=30) walking on concrete and on a soft, high-friction composite rubber surface to examine how flooring influenced gait and how this differed for cows with hoof lesions. Cows had hooves trimmed 9 wk after the trial and were classified as either with or without sole ulcers. Video recordings of the cows while walking were digitized using motion analysis software to calculate stride variables (length, height, overlap, duration, proportion of triple support, and speed). Gait was scored by a subjective scoring system (1 = sound to 5 = severely lame) and by a continuous visual analog scale for each of 7 gait attributes. Cows with sole ulcers walking on a composite rubber surface had longer strides (156.9±2.6 vs. 149.6±2.6cm), higher stride heights (9.7±0.3 vs. 8.8±0.3cm), more stride overlap (0.4±2.0 vs. −4.3±2.0cm), shorter periods of triple support (3 legs in ground contact; 68.6±2.0 vs. 73.8±2.0%), walked faster (1.22±0.04 vs. 1.17±0.04 m/s) and had lower overall gait scores (2.9±0.1 vs. 3.1±0.1), better tracking-up (19±2 vs. 24±2), better joint flexion (29±2 vs. 33±2), more symmetric steps (31±3 vs. 36±3), and less reluctance to bear weight on their legs (12±2 vs. 16±2) compared with walking on concrete. Similar results were found for cows without sole ulcers. Most of the subjective gait measures could distinguish between cows with and without sole ulcers, but this was not the case for kinematic measures other than stride height. Cows with higher gait scores (more severe lameness) showed the greatest improvement in stride length (r=−0.51), triple support (r=0.59), swing duration (r=−0.44), overall gait score (r=0.46), and reluctance to bear weight (r=0.66) when walking on the rubber surface compared with cows with lower gait scores. These results indicate that rubber flooring provides a more secure footing and is more comfortable to walk on, especially for lame cattle.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>dairy cattle</subject><subject>dairy cows</subject><subject>Dairying</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>flooring</subject><subject>floors</subject><subject>Floors and Floorcoverings</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Foot Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Foot Ulcer - veterinary</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>gait scores</subject><subject>hardness</subject><subject>Hoof and Claw - pathology</subject><subject>hoof trimming</subject><subject>hooves</subject><subject>Housing, Animal</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>lameness</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>Observation - methods</subject><subject>Rubber</subject><subject>sole ulcer</subject><subject>sole ulcers</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV-L1DAUxYMo7rj6FTQKioJdb5KmSR9lcHYXFnyog48hTZOZDG2zJu0ufnszf3DAJ5-SC7977rnnIvSWwBUjlfyy69JVA0BpAQzoRxCfBKlIrp6gBeGUF4zU8ila_EUu0IuUdrkkFPhzdEEErQUBWKCmCW6y8TO-8ZutjcUqejP5MOJVH0L04wbfDvcxPNiEr7WfcHB4GR4T_umnLdZjd_iEecJN6C1e98bG9BI9c7pP9tXpvUTr1bcfy5vi7vv17fLrXWE4k1PRcmNrBmUFTnIG0lEKgoNpqwoqaMF1tbZCgLCUU-0IdQCyM8Zk911rJLtEH4662eCv2aZJDT4Z2_d6tGFOqqoBOGEig-_-AXdhjmP2pkjNJS9JCRmqj5CJIaVonbqPftDxtyKg9rGrHLs6xK72mSoQ6hC72ve-Pg2Y28F2585Tzhl4fwJ0Mrp3UY_GpzMnuSQlqc4rbfM5Hn20Kg2677Ms2Y-vsxNFKOMZfHMEnQ5Kb2IWWzcUCAMQpeA1ycTySNh8ggdvo0rG29HYLsuaSXXB_8dmfwAq8rXd</recordid><startdate>20070301</startdate><enddate>20070301</enddate><creator>Flower, F.C.</creator><creator>de Passillé, A.M.</creator><creator>Weary, D.M.</creator><creator>Sanderson, D.J.</creator><creator>Rushen, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070301</creationdate><title>Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers</title><author>Flower, F.C. ; de Passillé, A.M. ; Weary, D.M. ; Sanderson, D.J. ; Rushen, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena - methods</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>dairy cattle</topic><topic>dairy cows</topic><topic>Dairying</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>flooring</topic><topic>floors</topic><topic>Floors and Floorcoverings</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Foot Ulcer - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Foot Ulcer - veterinary</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>gait scores</topic><topic>hardness</topic><topic>Hoof and Claw - pathology</topic><topic>hoof trimming</topic><topic>hooves</topic><topic>Housing, Animal</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>lameness</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>Observation - methods</topic><topic>Rubber</topic><topic>sole ulcer</topic><topic>sole ulcers</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flower, F.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Passillé, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weary, D.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, D.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rushen, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flower, F.C.</au><au>de Passillé, A.M.</au><au>Weary, D.M.</au><au>Sanderson, D.J.</au><au>Rushen, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2007-03-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1235</spage><epage>1242</epage><pages>1235-1242</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>We studied dairy cows (n=30) walking on concrete and on a soft, high-friction composite rubber surface to examine how flooring influenced gait and how this differed for cows with hoof lesions. Cows had hooves trimmed 9 wk after the trial and were classified as either with or without sole ulcers. Video recordings of the cows while walking were digitized using motion analysis software to calculate stride variables (length, height, overlap, duration, proportion of triple support, and speed). Gait was scored by a subjective scoring system (1 = sound to 5 = severely lame) and by a continuous visual analog scale for each of 7 gait attributes. Cows with sole ulcers walking on a composite rubber surface had longer strides (156.9±2.6 vs. 149.6±2.6cm), higher stride heights (9.7±0.3 vs. 8.8±0.3cm), more stride overlap (0.4±2.0 vs. −4.3±2.0cm), shorter periods of triple support (3 legs in ground contact; 68.6±2.0 vs. 73.8±2.0%), walked faster (1.22±0.04 vs. 1.17±0.04 m/s) and had lower overall gait scores (2.9±0.1 vs. 3.1±0.1), better tracking-up (19±2 vs. 24±2), better joint flexion (29±2 vs. 33±2), more symmetric steps (31±3 vs. 36±3), and less reluctance to bear weight on their legs (12±2 vs. 16±2) compared with walking on concrete. Similar results were found for cows without sole ulcers. Most of the subjective gait measures could distinguish between cows with and without sole ulcers, but this was not the case for kinematic measures other than stride height. Cows with higher gait scores (more severe lameness) showed the greatest improvement in stride length (r=−0.51), triple support (r=0.59), swing duration (r=−0.44), overall gait score (r=0.46), and reluctance to bear weight (r=0.66) when walking on the rubber surface compared with cows with lower gait scores. These results indicate that rubber flooring provides a more secure footing and is more comfortable to walk on, especially for lame cattle.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>17297100</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71612-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2007-03, Vol.90 (3), p.1235-1242
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69005137
source ScienceDirect Journals; EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Animal productions
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Biomechanical Phenomena - methods
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - prevention & control
dairy cattle
dairy cows
Dairying
Female
flooring
floors
Floors and Floorcoverings
Food industries
Foot Ulcer - prevention & control
Foot Ulcer - veterinary
Friction
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gait
Gait - physiology
gait scores
hardness
Hoof and Claw - pathology
hoof trimming
hooves
Housing, Animal
image analysis
lameness
Least-Squares Analysis
Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams
Observation - methods
Rubber
sole ulcer
sole ulcers
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
title Softer, Higher-Friction Flooring Improves Gait of Cows With and Without Sole Ulcers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A19%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Softer,%20Higher-Friction%20Flooring%20Improves%20Gait%20of%20Cows%20With%20and%20Without%20Sole%20Ulcers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Flower,%20F.C.&rft.date=2007-03-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1235&rft.epage=1242&rft.pages=1235-1242&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71612-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1261934271%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-b5ce930460f85308f220750cb66060b0fd9ae7707e252af12f008dccc172dbc83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195854140&rft_id=info:pmid/17297100&rfr_iscdi=true