Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry and optical coherence tomography

• Published in: Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2006-11, Vol.34 (8), p.751-754
• Main Authors: Leung, Dexter YL, Lam, Douglas KT, Yeung, Barry YM, Lam, Dennis SC
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Weights and Measures; cornea; Cornea - anatomy & histology; Cornea - diagnostic imaging; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological - instrumentation; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; optical coherence tomography; pachymetry; Reproducibility of Results; Tomography, Optical Coherence - methods; Ultrasonography - methods; ultrasound
• ISSN: 1442-6404; 1442-9071
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01343.x

Purpose:  Measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) plays an important role in both diagnostic and therapeutic assessment of ocular diseases. Although ultrasound pachymetry (U‐PACH) is regarded as the golden standard for measurement of CCT, optical coherence tomography (OCT) may offer advantages as it can locate the central cornea with precision with no corneal touch. Nevertheless, the agreement of OCT with U‐PACH has not yet been gauged by Bland–Altman analysis. This study compares CCT measurement by OCT with that by U‐PACH. Methods:  Healthy subjects without ocular abnormality (except refractive errors less than or equal to −6.0 D), contact lens wear or ocular surgery were recruited. CCT was measured in one eye of normal subjects using OCT and U‐PACH. Results were compared using correlation and Bland–Altman plots. Results:  Fifty subjects were recruited. Mean ± SD CCT measured by OCT was 565 ± 33 µm. This was highly correlated (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.934) with the mean thickness measured by U‐PACH (543 ± 33 µm). The coefficients of variation were good and comparable at 7.9% for U‐PACH and 3.5% for OCT. Compared with U‐PACH, OCT consistently overestimated the CCT by a mean of 23 µm as shown on Bland–Altman plot. Conclusion:  CCT measured by OCT and U‐PACH is highly correlated. With appropriate adjustment factor, OCT agrees well with U‐PACH and is a reliable alternative for CCT measurement.