Loading…
The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version
Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obste...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3 |
container_end_page | 157.e3 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 157.e1 |
container_title | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD Elram, Tamar, MD Tsafrir, Avi, MD Elchalal, Uriel, MD Ezra, Yossef, MD |
description | Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69020239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937806022046</els_id><sourcerecordid>69020239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuWP8AB5cQty9gOk1hCSKgCilqJQ_duee0xdcjGi52t6L_H1i5C4tCTNaP3nme-Yew1hzUHju_GtRnjj7UAwNJYD4N6xlYcVN_igMNztgIA0SrZD2fsPOexlkKJl-yM9xIQUazYzeaemjDb4Gi21ETf5H2cFzNTPOTmgVIOcW6MXyg13oSJXEO_SzGbqbG0vzdTsH9ll-yFN1OmV6f3gm2-fN5cXbe3379-u_p021opuqXlW_DvlULiW44guLTO8r5DKYwH5YYODaHjktBg2al3nRKyA-577NFbecHeHmP3Kf46UF70LmRL03QcWqMCAUKqIhRHoU0x50Re71PYmfSoOehKUI-6EtSVYO2V34rpzSn9sN2R-2c5ISuCD0cBlRUfAiWdbajwXEhkF-1ieDr_4392O4U5WDP9pEfKYzxUtllznYUGfVePVk8IBZWAQukPzKeWcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69020239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17306662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>breech presentation ; Breech Presentation - therapy ; cesarean section ; external cephalic version ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Remission, Spontaneous ; spontaneous version ; Treatment Failure ; Version, Fetal - statistics & numerical data</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17306662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elram, Tamar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</description><subject>breech presentation</subject><subject>Breech Presentation - therapy</subject><subject>cesarean section</subject><subject>external cephalic version</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Remission, Spontaneous</subject><subject>spontaneous version</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Version, Fetal - statistics & numerical data</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuWP8AB5cQty9gOk1hCSKgCilqJQ_duee0xdcjGi52t6L_H1i5C4tCTNaP3nme-Yew1hzUHju_GtRnjj7UAwNJYD4N6xlYcVN_igMNztgIA0SrZD2fsPOexlkKJl-yM9xIQUazYzeaemjDb4Gi21ETf5H2cFzNTPOTmgVIOcW6MXyg13oSJXEO_SzGbqbG0vzdTsH9ll-yFN1OmV6f3gm2-fN5cXbe3379-u_p021opuqXlW_DvlULiW44guLTO8r5DKYwH5YYODaHjktBg2al3nRKyA-577NFbecHeHmP3Kf46UF70LmRL03QcWqMCAUKqIhRHoU0x50Re71PYmfSoOehKUI-6EtSVYO2V34rpzSn9sN2R-2c5ISuCD0cBlRUfAiWdbajwXEhkF-1ieDr_4392O4U5WDP9pEfKYzxUtllznYUGfVePVk8IBZWAQukPzKeWcQ</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creator><creator>Elram, Tamar, MD</creator><creator>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creator><creator>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creator><creator>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><author>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>breech presentation</topic><topic>Breech Presentation - therapy</topic><topic>cesarean section</topic><topic>external cephalic version</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Remission, Spontaneous</topic><topic>spontaneous version</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Version, Fetal - statistics & numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elram, Tamar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</au><au>Elram, Tamar, MD</au><au>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</au><au>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</au><au>Ezra, Yossef, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157.e1</spage><epage>157.e3</epage><pages>157.e1-157.e3</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17306662</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-9378 |
ispartof | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3 |
issn | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69020239 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | breech presentation Breech Presentation - therapy cesarean section external cephalic version Female Humans Incidence Obstetrics and Gynecology Pregnancy Remission, Spontaneous spontaneous version Treatment Failure Version, Fetal - statistics & numerical data |
title | The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20incidence%20of%20spontaneous%20version%20after%20failed%20external%20cephalic%20version&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Ben-Meir,%20Assaf,%20MD&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157.e1&rft.epage=157.e3&rft.pages=157.e1-157.e3&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69020239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69020239&rft_id=info:pmid/17306662&rfr_iscdi=true |