Loading…

The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version

Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3
Main Authors: Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD, Elram, Tamar, MD, Tsafrir, Avi, MD, Elchalal, Uriel, MD, Ezra, Yossef, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3
container_end_page 157.e3
container_issue 2
container_start_page 157.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 196
creator Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD
Elram, Tamar, MD
Tsafrir, Avi, MD
Elchalal, Uriel, MD
Ezra, Yossef, MD
description Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69020239</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937806022046</els_id><sourcerecordid>69020239</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuWP8AB5cQty9gOk1hCSKgCilqJQ_duee0xdcjGi52t6L_H1i5C4tCTNaP3nme-Yew1hzUHju_GtRnjj7UAwNJYD4N6xlYcVN_igMNztgIA0SrZD2fsPOexlkKJl-yM9xIQUazYzeaemjDb4Gi21ETf5H2cFzNTPOTmgVIOcW6MXyg13oSJXEO_SzGbqbG0vzdTsH9ll-yFN1OmV6f3gm2-fN5cXbe3379-u_p021opuqXlW_DvlULiW44guLTO8r5DKYwH5YYODaHjktBg2al3nRKyA-577NFbecHeHmP3Kf46UF70LmRL03QcWqMCAUKqIhRHoU0x50Re71PYmfSoOehKUI-6EtSVYO2V34rpzSn9sN2R-2c5ISuCD0cBlRUfAiWdbajwXEhkF-1ieDr_4392O4U5WDP9pEfKYzxUtllznYUGfVePVk8IBZWAQukPzKeWcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69020239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17306662</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>breech presentation ; Breech Presentation - therapy ; cesarean section ; external cephalic version ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Pregnancy ; Remission, Spontaneous ; spontaneous version ; Treatment Failure ; Version, Fetal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3</ispartof><rights>Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>2007 Mosby, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17306662$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elram, Tamar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</description><subject>breech presentation</subject><subject>Breech Presentation - therapy</subject><subject>cesarean section</subject><subject>external cephalic version</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Remission, Spontaneous</subject><subject>spontaneous version</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><subject>Version, Fetal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EotuWP8AB5cQty9gOk1hCSKgCilqJQ_duee0xdcjGi52t6L_H1i5C4tCTNaP3nme-Yew1hzUHju_GtRnjj7UAwNJYD4N6xlYcVN_igMNztgIA0SrZD2fsPOexlkKJl-yM9xIQUazYzeaemjDb4Gi21ETf5H2cFzNTPOTmgVIOcW6MXyg13oSJXEO_SzGbqbG0vzdTsH9ll-yFN1OmV6f3gm2-fN5cXbe3379-u_p021opuqXlW_DvlULiW44guLTO8r5DKYwH5YYODaHjktBg2al3nRKyA-577NFbecHeHmP3Kf46UF70LmRL03QcWqMCAUKqIhRHoU0x50Re71PYmfSoOehKUI-6EtSVYO2V34rpzSn9sN2R-2c5ISuCD0cBlRUfAiWdbajwXEhkF-1ieDr_4392O4U5WDP9pEfKYzxUtllznYUGfVePVk8IBZWAQukPzKeWcQ</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creator><creator>Elram, Tamar, MD</creator><creator>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creator><creator>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creator><creator>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</title><author>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD ; Elram, Tamar, MD ; Tsafrir, Avi, MD ; Elchalal, Uriel, MD ; Ezra, Yossef, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>breech presentation</topic><topic>Breech Presentation - therapy</topic><topic>cesarean section</topic><topic>external cephalic version</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Remission, Spontaneous</topic><topic>spontaneous version</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><topic>Version, Fetal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elram, Tamar, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezra, Yossef, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Meir, Assaf, MD</au><au>Elram, Tamar, MD</au><au>Tsafrir, Avi, MD</au><au>Elchalal, Uriel, MD</au><au>Ezra, Yossef, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>157.e1</spage><epage>157.e3</epage><pages>157.e1-157.e3</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Objective The objective of the study was to assess the rate of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version (ECV) at term. Study design We prospectively collected data from all trials of ECV in our center between January 1997 and June 2005. Collected data included demographic and obstetric parameters. Results Six hundred three ECV attempts were included in the study. Success rates were 72.3% and 46.1% for multiparas and nulliparas, respectively. Of the 226 failed attempts (8 were lost to follow-up), the rate of spontaneous version to vertex presentation before the onset of labor was 6.6%. Of all 15 spontaneous versions, 3 were in the nulliparous group (2.3%) and 12 in the multiparous group (12.5%). Conclusion The incidence of spontaneous version after failed ECV is small, at least in nulliparous women. We recommend that ECV attempts should be undertaken in a setting prepared for elective cesarean section in the event of ECV failure, if vaginal breech delivery is not considered an option, and preferably after 39 weeks to decrease neonatal morbidity from respiratory complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>17306662</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2007-02, Vol.196 (2), p.157.e1-157.e3
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69020239
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects breech presentation
Breech Presentation - therapy
cesarean section
external cephalic version
Female
Humans
Incidence
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pregnancy
Remission, Spontaneous
spontaneous version
Treatment Failure
Version, Fetal - statistics & numerical data
title The incidence of spontaneous version after failed external cephalic version
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A14%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20incidence%20of%20spontaneous%20version%20after%20failed%20external%20cephalic%20version&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Ben-Meir,%20Assaf,%20MD&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=157.e1&rft.epage=157.e3&rft.pages=157.e1-157.e3&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.10.889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69020239%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-1b0f5996e1b160213cdc174632af09d846ae6d13e6a68897d4923401f7676fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69020239&rft_id=info:pmid/17306662&rfr_iscdi=true