Loading…
S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests
Our purpose was to determine whether S-100B or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) concentrations in the serum of patients with large uveal melanomas were better markers for the presentation of metastases than liver function tests. We also investigated whether increased marker levels were related to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tumor biology 2007-01, Vol.28 (2), p.63-69 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 69 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Tumor biology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Missotten, G S Korse, C M van Dehn, C Linders, T C Keunen, J E Jager, M J Bonfrer, J M |
description | Our purpose was to determine whether S-100B or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) concentrations in the serum of patients with large uveal melanomas were better markers for the presentation of metastases than liver function tests. We also investigated whether increased marker levels were related to known clinical and histopathological prognostic parameters.
Total S-100B (A1B + BB) and MIA concentrations were measured in the sera from 104 patients with uveal melanoma prior to enucleation and in the sera from 50 healthy controls. Concentrations were also determined in the sera from 30 patients with known uveal melanoma metastases. Liaison Sangtec 100, an automated immunoluminometric assay measuring the total S-100B, and Roche MIA ELISA were used to quantify these proteins in serum. Results were compared with liver function tests [alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase].
The mean S-100B and MIA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with metastases compared to melanoma patients without metastases. At the time of enucleation, S-100B and MIA were not prognostic for metastases in uveal melanoma, but S-100B and LD were the best tests to predict the occurrence of metastatic disease during the follow-up period.
In our study, the S-100B and MIA serum concentrations were not correlated with any tested established prognostic parameter. S-100B and LD showed better performance in identifying melanoma metastases than gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and MIA. A prospective follow-up study is needed to evaluate S-100B and MIA in identifying early micrometastasis in uveal melanoma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000099151 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69037139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1223981861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-d92844c763b9a871a9ceddca056e0154ad50cdcaf893949994b531dcda2e55283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQx4MotlYPfgEJHrxtzXN3c6zFFxQ8qOclm6Q2ZTe7JtmW4pc3YlVwGJgHP2b-MwCcYzTFmItrlEwIzPEBGGNGaIZoiQ5TjjDKGCnpCJyEsEYowSI_BiNckJxxWo7Bx3OGEbqBve-isQ5Kp2FrGum6VkLrVra2sfM7KFW0Gxt3v2DyYWNk80cH5Y1x1r1N4Qyqru2lt6FzcGvjCjZ2YzxcDi7NSb1oQgyn4Ggpm2DO9nECXu9uX-YP2eLp_nE-W2Q9oXnMtCAlY6rIaS1kWWAplNFaScRzky5iUnOkUr0sBRVMCMFqTrFWWhLDebp-Aq6-5ybt70PaXLU2KNMk3aYbQpULRAtMRQIv_4HrbvAuaasIIQUhAn9BF3toqFujq97bVvpd9fNT-gkYOnhH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222722919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Missotten, G S ; Korse, C M ; van Dehn, C ; Linders, T C ; Keunen, J E ; Jager, M J ; Bonfrer, J M</creator><creatorcontrib>Missotten, G S ; Korse, C M ; van Dehn, C ; Linders, T C ; Keunen, J E ; Jager, M J ; Bonfrer, J M</creatorcontrib><description>Our purpose was to determine whether S-100B or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) concentrations in the serum of patients with large uveal melanomas were better markers for the presentation of metastases than liver function tests. We also investigated whether increased marker levels were related to known clinical and histopathological prognostic parameters.
Total S-100B (A1B + BB) and MIA concentrations were measured in the sera from 104 patients with uveal melanoma prior to enucleation and in the sera from 50 healthy controls. Concentrations were also determined in the sera from 30 patients with known uveal melanoma metastases. Liaison Sangtec 100, an automated immunoluminometric assay measuring the total S-100B, and Roche MIA ELISA were used to quantify these proteins in serum. Results were compared with liver function tests [alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase].
The mean S-100B and MIA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with metastases compared to melanoma patients without metastases. At the time of enucleation, S-100B and MIA were not prognostic for metastases in uveal melanoma, but S-100B and LD were the best tests to predict the occurrence of metastatic disease during the follow-up period.
In our study, the S-100B and MIA serum concentrations were not correlated with any tested established prognostic parameter. S-100B and LD showed better performance in identifying melanoma metastases than gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and MIA. A prospective follow-up study is needed to evaluate S-100B and MIA in identifying early micrometastasis in uveal melanoma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-4283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0380</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000099151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17264538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; Case-Control Studies ; Extracellular Matrix Proteins - blood ; Female ; gamma-Glutamyltransferase - blood ; Humans ; Liver Function Tests ; Male ; Melanoma - blood ; Melanoma - secondary ; Neoplasm Proteins - blood ; Nerve Growth Factors - blood ; Prognosis ; S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit ; S100 Proteins - blood ; Skin Neoplasms - blood ; Skin Neoplasms - secondary ; Uveal Neoplasms - blood ; Uveal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><ispartof>Tumor biology, 2007-01, Vol.28 (2), p.63-69</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222722919?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,25736,27907,27908,36995,36996,44573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17264538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Missotten, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korse, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dehn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linders, T C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keunen, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonfrer, J M</creatorcontrib><title>S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests</title><title>Tumor biology</title><addtitle>Tumour Biol</addtitle><description>Our purpose was to determine whether S-100B or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) concentrations in the serum of patients with large uveal melanomas were better markers for the presentation of metastases than liver function tests. We also investigated whether increased marker levels were related to known clinical and histopathological prognostic parameters.
Total S-100B (A1B + BB) and MIA concentrations were measured in the sera from 104 patients with uveal melanoma prior to enucleation and in the sera from 50 healthy controls. Concentrations were also determined in the sera from 30 patients with known uveal melanoma metastases. Liaison Sangtec 100, an automated immunoluminometric assay measuring the total S-100B, and Roche MIA ELISA were used to quantify these proteins in serum. Results were compared with liver function tests [alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase].
The mean S-100B and MIA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with metastases compared to melanoma patients without metastases. At the time of enucleation, S-100B and MIA were not prognostic for metastases in uveal melanoma, but S-100B and LD were the best tests to predict the occurrence of metastatic disease during the follow-up period.
In our study, the S-100B and MIA serum concentrations were not correlated with any tested established prognostic parameter. S-100B and LD showed better performance in identifying melanoma metastases than gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and MIA. A prospective follow-up study is needed to evaluate S-100B and MIA in identifying early micrometastasis in uveal melanoma.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gamma-Glutamyltransferase - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver Function Tests</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melanoma - blood</subject><subject>Melanoma - secondary</subject><subject>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Nerve Growth Factors - blood</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit</subject><subject>S100 Proteins - blood</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Uveal Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Uveal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><issn>1010-4283</issn><issn>1423-0380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLAzEQx4MotlYPfgEJHrxtzXN3c6zFFxQ8qOclm6Q2ZTe7JtmW4pc3YlVwGJgHP2b-MwCcYzTFmItrlEwIzPEBGGNGaIZoiQ5TjjDKGCnpCJyEsEYowSI_BiNckJxxWo7Bx3OGEbqBve-isQ5Kp2FrGum6VkLrVra2sfM7KFW0Gxt3v2DyYWNk80cH5Y1x1r1N4Qyqru2lt6FzcGvjCjZ2YzxcDi7NSb1oQgyn4Ggpm2DO9nECXu9uX-YP2eLp_nE-W2Q9oXnMtCAlY6rIaS1kWWAplNFaScRzky5iUnOkUr0sBRVMCMFqTrFWWhLDebp-Aq6-5ybt70PaXLU2KNMk3aYbQpULRAtMRQIv_4HrbvAuaasIIQUhAn9BF3toqFujq97bVvpd9fNT-gkYOnhH</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Missotten, G S</creator><creator>Korse, C M</creator><creator>van Dehn, C</creator><creator>Linders, T C</creator><creator>Keunen, J E</creator><creator>Jager, M J</creator><creator>Bonfrer, J M</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests</title><author>Missotten, G S ; Korse, C M ; van Dehn, C ; Linders, T C ; Keunen, J E ; Jager, M J ; Bonfrer, J M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-d92844c763b9a871a9ceddca056e0154ad50cdcaf893949994b531dcda2e55283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gamma-Glutamyltransferase - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver Function Tests</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melanoma - blood</topic><topic>Melanoma - secondary</topic><topic>Neoplasm Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Nerve Growth Factors - blood</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit</topic><topic>S100 Proteins - blood</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Uveal Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Uveal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Missotten, G S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korse, C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dehn, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linders, T C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keunen, J E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jager, M J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonfrer, J M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (ProQuest Medical & Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tumor biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Missotten, G S</au><au>Korse, C M</au><au>van Dehn, C</au><au>Linders, T C</au><au>Keunen, J E</au><au>Jager, M J</au><au>Bonfrer, J M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests</atitle><jtitle>Tumor biology</jtitle><addtitle>Tumour Biol</addtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>69</epage><pages>63-69</pages><issn>1010-4283</issn><eissn>1423-0380</eissn><abstract>Our purpose was to determine whether S-100B or melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) concentrations in the serum of patients with large uveal melanomas were better markers for the presentation of metastases than liver function tests. We also investigated whether increased marker levels were related to known clinical and histopathological prognostic parameters.
Total S-100B (A1B + BB) and MIA concentrations were measured in the sera from 104 patients with uveal melanoma prior to enucleation and in the sera from 50 healthy controls. Concentrations were also determined in the sera from 30 patients with known uveal melanoma metastases. Liaison Sangtec 100, an automated immunoluminometric assay measuring the total S-100B, and Roche MIA ELISA were used to quantify these proteins in serum. Results were compared with liver function tests [alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase (LD), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase].
The mean S-100B and MIA concentrations were significantly higher in patients with metastases compared to melanoma patients without metastases. At the time of enucleation, S-100B and MIA were not prognostic for metastases in uveal melanoma, but S-100B and LD were the best tests to predict the occurrence of metastatic disease during the follow-up period.
In our study, the S-100B and MIA serum concentrations were not correlated with any tested established prognostic parameter. S-100B and LD showed better performance in identifying melanoma metastases than gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and MIA. A prospective follow-up study is needed to evaluate S-100B and MIA in identifying early micrometastasis in uveal melanoma.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>17264538</pmid><doi>10.1159/000099151</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-4283 |
ispartof | Tumor biology, 2007-01, Vol.28 (2), p.63-69 |
issn | 1010-4283 1423-0380 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69037139 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Aged Biomarkers, Tumor - blood Case-Control Studies Extracellular Matrix Proteins - blood Female gamma-Glutamyltransferase - blood Humans Liver Function Tests Male Melanoma - blood Melanoma - secondary Neoplasm Proteins - blood Nerve Growth Factors - blood Prognosis S100 Calcium Binding Protein beta Subunit S100 Proteins - blood Skin Neoplasms - blood Skin Neoplasms - secondary Uveal Neoplasms - blood Uveal Neoplasms - pathology |
title | S-100B protein and melanoma inhibitory activity protein in uveal melanoma screening. A comparison with liver function tests |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T04%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=S-100B%20protein%20and%20melanoma%20inhibitory%20activity%20protein%20in%20uveal%20melanoma%20screening.%20A%20comparison%20with%20liver%20function%20tests&rft.jtitle=Tumor%20biology&rft.au=Missotten,%20G%20S&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=69&rft.pages=63-69&rft.issn=1010-4283&rft.eissn=1423-0380&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000099151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1223981861%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p236t-d92844c763b9a871a9ceddca056e0154ad50cdcaf893949994b531dcda2e55283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222722919&rft_id=info:pmid/17264538&rfr_iscdi=true |