Loading…
Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection
The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminesc...
Saved in:
Published in: | Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Korean |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 359 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 355 |
container_title | Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Huh, Hee Jin Chae, Seok-Lae Cha, Young Joo |
description | The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea.
We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant.
The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested.
Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69076801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69076801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpV0D1PwzAYBGAPIFqV_gEG5IktwY5jOx6h4kuqxAJz9Dp2qCF2QuyA0l9PJcrAdMuj0-kQuqAkZ6xk1x_vnc8LQmReyJznjPMTtKRcVZngjC_QOkanCS2KQtKyPEMLWhFVCkKXaL_p_QCji33AMU1mxt8u7bAN-9lb7LyfQg8xwowhGNzsrHfd5F2wsbGh-S_afsQ7O0ByyUV8i7_cOEUcp7GFg4SQ3JsN2Nhkm-T6cI5OW-iiXR9zhV7v7142j9n2-eFpc7PNhoKolAFVwghrtKEGGko1lLKUUinaQkUlM4UwBoRkpSZca82rtpIKhDJaSgYVW6Gr395h7D8nG1Pt3WF910Gw_RRroYgUFaEHeHmEk_bW1MPoPIxz_fcW-wFuv3Ah</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69076801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><description>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea.
We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant.
The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested.
Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-6535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18094601</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>Korea (South)</publisher><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood ; Humans ; Luminescent Measurements - methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi, 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Seok-Lae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><title>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</title><addtitle>Korean J Lab Med</addtitle><description>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea.
We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant.
The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested.
Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</description><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luminescent Measurements - methods</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1598-6535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpV0D1PwzAYBGAPIFqV_gEG5IktwY5jOx6h4kuqxAJz9Dp2qCF2QuyA0l9PJcrAdMuj0-kQuqAkZ6xk1x_vnc8LQmReyJznjPMTtKRcVZngjC_QOkanCS2KQtKyPEMLWhFVCkKXaL_p_QCji33AMU1mxt8u7bAN-9lb7LyfQg8xwowhGNzsrHfd5F2wsbGh-S_afsQ7O0ByyUV8i7_cOEUcp7GFg4SQ3JsN2Nhkm-T6cI5OW-iiXR9zhV7v7142j9n2-eFpc7PNhoKolAFVwghrtKEGGko1lLKUUinaQkUlM4UwBoRkpSZca82rtpIKhDJaSgYVW6Gr395h7D8nG1Pt3WF910Gw_RRroYgUFaEHeHmEk_bW1MPoPIxz_fcW-wFuv3Ah</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Huh, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Chae, Seok-Lae</creator><creator>Cha, Young Joo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><author>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luminescent Measurements - methods</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Seok-Lae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huh, Hee Jin</au><au>Chae, Seok-Lae</au><au>Cha, Young Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</atitle><jtitle>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Lab Med</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>355-359</pages><issn>1598-6535</issn><abstract>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea.
We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant.
The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested.
Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pmid>18094601</pmid><doi>10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1598-6535 |
ispartof | Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi, 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359 |
issn | 1598-6535 |
language | kor |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69076801 |
source | EZB Free E-Journals |
subjects | Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood Humans Luminescent Measurements - methods Reagent Kits, Diagnostic Reference Values Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20study%20with%20enzyme%20immunoassay%20and%20chemiluminescence%20immunoassay%20for%20hepatitis%20B%20virus%20surface%20antigen%20detection&rft.jtitle=Taehan%20Chindan%20K%C5%8Fmsa%20%C5%ACihakhoe%20chi&rft.au=Huh,%20Hee%20Jin&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=355-359&rft.issn=1598-6535&rft_id=info:doi/10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69076801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69076801&rft_id=info:pmid/18094601&rfr_iscdi=true |