Loading…

Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection

The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminesc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359
Main Authors: Huh, Hee Jin, Chae, Seok-Lae, Cha, Young Joo
Format: Article
Language:Korean
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 359
container_issue 5
container_start_page 355
container_title Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi
container_volume 27
creator Huh, Hee Jin
Chae, Seok-Lae
Cha, Young Joo
description The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea. We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant. The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested. Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.
doi_str_mv 10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69076801</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69076801</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpV0D1PwzAYBGAPIFqV_gEG5IktwY5jOx6h4kuqxAJz9Dp2qCF2QuyA0l9PJcrAdMuj0-kQuqAkZ6xk1x_vnc8LQmReyJznjPMTtKRcVZngjC_QOkanCS2KQtKyPEMLWhFVCkKXaL_p_QCji33AMU1mxt8u7bAN-9lb7LyfQg8xwowhGNzsrHfd5F2wsbGh-S_afsQ7O0ByyUV8i7_cOEUcp7GFg4SQ3JsN2Nhkm-T6cI5OW-iiXR9zhV7v7142j9n2-eFpc7PNhoKolAFVwghrtKEGGko1lLKUUinaQkUlM4UwBoRkpSZca82rtpIKhDJaSgYVW6Gr395h7D8nG1Pt3WF910Gw_RRroYgUFaEHeHmEk_bW1MPoPIxz_fcW-wFuv3Ah</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69076801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><source>EZB Free E-Journals</source><creator>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><description>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea. We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant. The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested. Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1598-6535</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18094601</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>Korea (South)</publisher><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood ; Humans ; Luminescent Measurements - methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Reference Values ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi, 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18094601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Seok-Lae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><title>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</title><addtitle>Korean J Lab Med</addtitle><description>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea. We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant. The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested. Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</description><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Luminescent Measurements - methods</subject><subject>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1598-6535</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpV0D1PwzAYBGAPIFqV_gEG5IktwY5jOx6h4kuqxAJz9Dp2qCF2QuyA0l9PJcrAdMuj0-kQuqAkZ6xk1x_vnc8LQmReyJznjPMTtKRcVZngjC_QOkanCS2KQtKyPEMLWhFVCkKXaL_p_QCji33AMU1mxt8u7bAN-9lb7LyfQg8xwowhGNzsrHfd5F2wsbGh-S_afsQ7O0ByyUV8i7_cOEUcp7GFg4SQ3JsN2Nhkm-T6cI5OW-iiXR9zhV7v7142j9n2-eFpc7PNhoKolAFVwghrtKEGGko1lLKUUinaQkUlM4UwBoRkpSZca82rtpIKhDJaSgYVW6Gr395h7D8nG1Pt3WF910Gw_RRroYgUFaEHeHmEk_bW1MPoPIxz_fcW-wFuv3Ah</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Huh, Hee Jin</creator><creator>Chae, Seok-Lae</creator><creator>Cha, Young Joo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</title><author>Huh, Hee Jin ; Chae, Seok-Lae ; Cha, Young Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Luminescent Measurements - methods</topic><topic>Reagent Kits, Diagnostic</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huh, Hee Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chae, Seok-Lae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Young Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huh, Hee Jin</au><au>Chae, Seok-Lae</au><au>Cha, Young Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection</atitle><jtitle>Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi</jtitle><addtitle>Korean J Lab Med</addtitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>355</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>355-359</pages><issn>1598-6535</issn><abstract>The serological detection of the surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the basis of detection of HBV infections in blood donors and patients with hepatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of HBsAg enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HBsAg chemiluminescence immunoassay used in Korea. We compared seven assays: Architect i2000 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Elecsys 2010 immunoanalyzer (Roche Diagnostics, Germany), Advia Centaur (Bayer Healthcare, USA), Murex HBsAg version 3 (Abbott Laboratories, USA), Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (DADE Behring, Germany), LG HBsAg ELISA (LG, Korea), and Genedia HBsAg ELISA 3.0 (Greencross Medical Science, Korea). We evaluated the sensitivity of each assay by testing serially diluted WHO HBsAg reference material, two seroconversion panels, and recombinant HBsAg with three mutations in the 'a' determinant. The lowest HBsAg level detected by each assay using WHO reference material was variable from 0.05 (Murex and Advia) to 0.2 IU/mL. When testing 21 seroconversion panels, the total number of positive samples was 15 by Murex and 14 by Architect. Murex, LG, and Architect detected all of the 3 mutant samples tested. Analytical sensitivity and mutant detecting ability among HBsAg commercial assays were variable and not related to the analytical methods, but related to the manufacturer's reagents. We suggest that each laboratory should select an HBsAg assay based on analytical performance, test throughput, and the applicability of full automation.</abstract><cop>Korea (South)</cop><pmid>18094601</pmid><doi>10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1598-6535
ispartof Taehan Chindan Kŏmsa Ŭihakhoe chi, 2007-10, Vol.27 (5), p.355-359
issn 1598-6535
language kor
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69076801
source EZB Free E-Journals
subjects Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens - blood
Humans
Luminescent Measurements - methods
Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
Reference Values
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Comparison study with enzyme immunoassay and chemiluminescence immunoassay for hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A46%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20study%20with%20enzyme%20immunoassay%20and%20chemiluminescence%20immunoassay%20for%20hepatitis%20B%20virus%20surface%20antigen%20detection&rft.jtitle=Taehan%20Chindan%20K%C5%8Fmsa%20%C5%ACihakhoe%20chi&rft.au=Huh,%20Hee%20Jin&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=355&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=355-359&rft.issn=1598-6535&rft_id=info:doi/10.3343/kjlm.2007.27.5.355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69076801%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p209t-a196d6edbd1dac11ba47477991fa8173d26dda6734b05bbb58f879a69db773a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69076801&rft_id=info:pmid/18094601&rfr_iscdi=true