Long-term outcome of patients with drug-refractory atrial flutter and fibrillation after single- and dual-site right atrial pacing for arrhythmia prevention

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1998-12, Vol.32 (7), p.1900-1908
• Main Authors: Delfaut, Philippe, Saksena, Sanjeev, Prakash, Atul, Krol, Ryszard B.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents - therapeutic use; Atrial Fibrillation - drug therapy; Atrial Fibrillation - therapy; Biological and medical sciences; Cardiac dysrhythmias; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods; Cardiology. Vascular system; Cross-Over Studies; Electric Countershock; Feasibility Studies; Female; Heart; Humans; Male; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0735-1097; 1558-3597
• DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00489-6

Objectives. An initial crossover study comparing dual- and single-site right atrial pacing was performed followed by a long-term efficacy and safety evaluation of dual-site right atrial pacing in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Also examined was the efficacy of two single-site right atrial pacing modes (high right atrium and coronary sinus ostium) and the long-term need for cardioversion, antithrombotic and antiarrhythmic drug therapies during dual-site atrial pacing. Methods. Thirty consecutive patients with drug-refractory symptomatic AF and documented primary or drug-induced bradycardia were implanted with a dual chamber rate-responsive pacemaker and two atrial leads. Single-site atrial pacing was performed at the high right atrium or the coronary sinus ostium. Continuous atrial pacing was maintained. Results. Mean arrhythmia-free intervals increased from 9 ± 10 days in the control period preceding implant to 143 ± 110 days (p < 0.0001) in single-site right atrial pacing and 195 ± 96 days in dual-site right atrial pacing (p < 0.005 versus single-site pacing and p < 0.0001 versus control). Dual-site right atrial pacing significantly increased the proportion of patients free of AF recurrence (89%) as compared to single-site right atrial pacing (62%, p = 0.02). High right atrial pacing and coronary sinus ostial pacing had similar efficacy for AF prevention. Effective rhythm control was achieved in 86% of patients during dual right atrial pacing. Seventy-eight percent of patients at 1 year and 56% at 3 years remained free of symptomatic AF. The need for cardioversion was reduced after pacemaker implant (p < 0.05) and antithrombotic therapy was reduced (p < 0.06) without any thromboembolic event. Coronary sinus ostial lead dislodgement was not observed after discharge. Conclusions. Atrial pacing in combination with antiarrhythmic drugs eliminates or markedly reduces recurrent AF. Prevention of AF is enhanced by dual-site right atrial pacing. High right atrial and coronary sinus ostial pacing do not differ in efficacy. Dual-site right atrial pacing is safe, achieves long-term rhythm control in most patients, decreases the need for cardioversion, and antithrombotic therapy can be selectively reduced.