Loading…

Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes

It is well established that long‐term protection from insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) can be afforded to non‐obese diabetic (NOD) mice by a short course of non‐depleting (nd) anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Since it is increasingly apparent that the CD8+ T cell plays a prominent rol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of immunology 1998-12, Vol.28 (12), p.4362-4373
Main Authors: Parish, Nicole M., Bowie, Laura, Zusman Harach, Silvia, Phillips, Jenny M., Cooke, Anne
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4892-6c52c237ebf2f35e5a06f16be9dfad09c68ab28dec42bfaeb6cf190a0b5880ae3
container_end_page 4373
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4362
container_title European journal of immunology
container_volume 28
creator Parish, Nicole M.
Bowie, Laura
Zusman Harach, Silvia
Phillips, Jenny M.
Cooke, Anne
description It is well established that long‐term protection from insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) can be afforded to non‐obese diabetic (NOD) mice by a short course of non‐depleting (nd) anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Since it is increasingly apparent that the CD8+ T cell plays a prominent role in the development of IDDM, we have investigated the effect of an anti‐CD8 mAb (YTS 105) of the same isotype in both spontaneous and induced IDDM in NOD mice. Treatment with YTS 105 for 3 weeks was able to prevent the transfer of IDDM for a long period, and also substantially reduced spontaneous IDDM in female NOD mice. The role of the thymus in tolerance induction by these antibodies was studied. In the adult transfer model, thymectomized NOD mice, unlike their euthymic counterparts, were not protected long‐term by treatment with YTS 105, and began to become overtly diabetic shortly after treatment. This was also true when the nd anti‐CD4 mAb was used. Protection from spontaneous disease was not affected in the same way by thymectomy. The reasons for the observed effect of the thymus in the transfer model, and the differences between the two models that may explain the contrasting results are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12<4362::AID-IMMU4362>3.0.CO;2-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69101509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69101509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4892-6c52c237ebf2f35e5a06f16be9dfad09c68ab28dec42bfaeb6cf190a0b5880ae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EGpqBT0DKCs0s0pSdR9vNCGkIr0gz6gXTGxaUHLssgvJo4kSod3wC38iX4Kib3iA0G1uue32rVIexNxyWHEC8vPhUFuUlzwSPU57yC66U5OJSyDUXV2mSi_X6unwbl7e32_n1OlnCsti8ErF4wBanbw_ZAoCnsVASHrMn3n8DAJVn6oydKZmLZJUs2Pbu676d_O-fvyztqLPUjVHbd71p-k43ke7GuurtPuh1ZydDNtoN_UhmrPsuckPfRuOgO-9oGIJma13RSP4pe-R04-nZ8T5n2_fv7oqP8c3mQ1lc38QmlUrEucmECXNQ5YRLMso05I7nFSnrtAVlcqkrIS2ZVFROU5UbxxVoqDIpQVNyzl4ccsNQ3yfyI7a1N9Q0uqN-8pgrDjwDda-Rr_gqC7sMxs8Hoxl67wdyuBvqVg975IAzHMQZDs5bxnnLeICDQmI4ZxyIAQ7-hYMJAhYbDI4Q_vw4xVS1ZE_RRxpB_3LQf9QN7f_pfG_j__Q91ZI_5UiwpA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17175436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Parish, Nicole M. ; Bowie, Laura ; Zusman Harach, Silvia ; Phillips, Jenny M. ; Cooke, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Parish, Nicole M. ; Bowie, Laura ; Zusman Harach, Silvia ; Phillips, Jenny M. ; Cooke, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>It is well established that long‐term protection from insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) can be afforded to non‐obese diabetic (NOD) mice by a short course of non‐depleting (nd) anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Since it is increasingly apparent that the CD8+ T cell plays a prominent role in the development of IDDM, we have investigated the effect of an anti‐CD8 mAb (YTS 105) of the same isotype in both spontaneous and induced IDDM in NOD mice. Treatment with YTS 105 for 3 weeks was able to prevent the transfer of IDDM for a long period, and also substantially reduced spontaneous IDDM in female NOD mice. The role of the thymus in tolerance induction by these antibodies was studied. In the adult transfer model, thymectomized NOD mice, unlike their euthymic counterparts, were not protected long‐term by treatment with YTS 105, and began to become overtly diabetic shortly after treatment. This was also true when the nd anti‐CD4 mAb was used. Protection from spontaneous disease was not affected in the same way by thymectomy. The reasons for the observed effect of the thymus in the transfer model, and the differences between the two models that may explain the contrasting results are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-4141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12&lt;4362::AID-IMMU4362&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9862373</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH</publisher><subject>Animals ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology ; CD4 Antigens - immunology ; CD8 Antigens - immunology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - immunology ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - prevention &amp; control ; Female ; Immune Tolerance ; Insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus ; Mice ; Mice, Inbred NOD ; Monoclonal antibody ; NOD mouse ; Thymus ; Thymus Gland - immunology ; Tolerance</subject><ispartof>European journal of immunology, 1998-12, Vol.28 (12), p.4362-4373</ispartof><rights>1998 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim, Fed. Rep. of Germany</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4892-6c52c237ebf2f35e5a06f16be9dfad09c68ab28dec42bfaeb6cf190a0b5880ae3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9862373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parish, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zusman Harach, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes</title><title>European journal of immunology</title><addtitle>Eur J Immunol</addtitle><description>It is well established that long‐term protection from insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) can be afforded to non‐obese diabetic (NOD) mice by a short course of non‐depleting (nd) anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Since it is increasingly apparent that the CD8+ T cell plays a prominent role in the development of IDDM, we have investigated the effect of an anti‐CD8 mAb (YTS 105) of the same isotype in both spontaneous and induced IDDM in NOD mice. Treatment with YTS 105 for 3 weeks was able to prevent the transfer of IDDM for a long period, and also substantially reduced spontaneous IDDM in female NOD mice. The role of the thymus in tolerance induction by these antibodies was studied. In the adult transfer model, thymectomized NOD mice, unlike their euthymic counterparts, were not protected long‐term by treatment with YTS 105, and began to become overtly diabetic shortly after treatment. This was also true when the nd anti‐CD4 mAb was used. Protection from spontaneous disease was not affected in the same way by thymectomy. The reasons for the observed effect of the thymus in the transfer model, and the differences between the two models that may explain the contrasting results are discussed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</subject><subject>CD4 Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>CD8 Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - immunology</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Immune Tolerance</subject><subject>Insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Mice, Inbred NOD</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>NOD mouse</subject><subject>Thymus</subject><subject>Thymus Gland - immunology</subject><subject>Tolerance</subject><issn>0014-2980</issn><issn>1521-4141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkcuO1DAQRS0EGpqBT0DKCs0s0pSdR9vNCGkIr0gz6gXTGxaUHLssgvJo4kSod3wC38iX4Kib3iA0G1uue32rVIexNxyWHEC8vPhUFuUlzwSPU57yC66U5OJSyDUXV2mSi_X6unwbl7e32_n1OlnCsti8ErF4wBanbw_ZAoCnsVASHrMn3n8DAJVn6oydKZmLZJUs2Pbu676d_O-fvyztqLPUjVHbd71p-k43ke7GuurtPuh1ZydDNtoN_UhmrPsuckPfRuOgO-9oGIJma13RSP4pe-R04-nZ8T5n2_fv7oqP8c3mQ1lc38QmlUrEucmECXNQ5YRLMso05I7nFSnrtAVlcqkrIS2ZVFROU5UbxxVoqDIpQVNyzl4ccsNQ3yfyI7a1N9Q0uqN-8pgrDjwDda-Rr_gqC7sMxs8Hoxl67wdyuBvqVg975IAzHMQZDs5bxnnLeICDQmI4ZxyIAQ7-hYMJAhYbDI4Q_vw4xVS1ZE_RRxpB_3LQf9QN7f_pfG_j__Q91ZI_5UiwpA</recordid><startdate>199812</startdate><enddate>199812</enddate><creator>Parish, Nicole M.</creator><creator>Bowie, Laura</creator><creator>Zusman Harach, Silvia</creator><creator>Phillips, Jenny M.</creator><creator>Cooke, Anne</creator><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199812</creationdate><title>Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes</title><author>Parish, Nicole M. ; Bowie, Laura ; Zusman Harach, Silvia ; Phillips, Jenny M. ; Cooke, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4892-6c52c237ebf2f35e5a06f16be9dfad09c68ab28dec42bfaeb6cf190a0b5880ae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology</topic><topic>CD4 Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>CD8 Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - immunology</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Immune Tolerance</topic><topic>Insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Mice, Inbred NOD</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>NOD mouse</topic><topic>Thymus</topic><topic>Thymus Gland - immunology</topic><topic>Tolerance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parish, Nicole M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowie, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zusman Harach, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Jenny M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooke, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parish, Nicole M.</au><au>Bowie, Laura</au><au>Zusman Harach, Silvia</au><au>Phillips, Jenny M.</au><au>Cooke, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes</atitle><jtitle>European journal of immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Immunol</addtitle><date>1998-12</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4362</spage><epage>4373</epage><pages>4362-4373</pages><issn>0014-2980</issn><eissn>1521-4141</eissn><abstract>It is well established that long‐term protection from insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) can be afforded to non‐obese diabetic (NOD) mice by a short course of non‐depleting (nd) anti‐CD4 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Since it is increasingly apparent that the CD8+ T cell plays a prominent role in the development of IDDM, we have investigated the effect of an anti‐CD8 mAb (YTS 105) of the same isotype in both spontaneous and induced IDDM in NOD mice. Treatment with YTS 105 for 3 weeks was able to prevent the transfer of IDDM for a long period, and also substantially reduced spontaneous IDDM in female NOD mice. The role of the thymus in tolerance induction by these antibodies was studied. In the adult transfer model, thymectomized NOD mice, unlike their euthymic counterparts, were not protected long‐term by treatment with YTS 105, and began to become overtly diabetic shortly after treatment. This was also true when the nd anti‐CD4 mAb was used. Protection from spontaneous disease was not affected in the same way by thymectomy. The reasons for the observed effect of the thymus in the transfer model, and the differences between the two models that may explain the contrasting results are discussed.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH</pub><pmid>9862373</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12&lt;4362::AID-IMMU4362&gt;3.0.CO;2-2</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2980
ispartof European journal of immunology, 1998-12, Vol.28 (12), p.4362-4373
issn 0014-2980
1521-4141
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69101509
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animals
Antibodies, Monoclonal - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal - immunology
CD4 Antigens - immunology
CD8 Antigens - immunology
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - immunology
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - prevention & control
Female
Immune Tolerance
Insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus
Mice
Mice, Inbred NOD
Monoclonal antibody
NOD mouse
Thymus
Thymus Gland - immunology
Tolerance
title Thymus‐dependent monoclonal antibody‐induced protection from transferred diabetes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T20%3A39%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thymus%E2%80%90dependent%20monoclonal%20antibody%E2%80%90induced%20protection%20from%20transferred%20diabetes&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20immunology&rft.au=Parish,%20Nicole%20M.&rft.date=1998-12&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4362&rft.epage=4373&rft.pages=4362-4373&rft.issn=0014-2980&rft.eissn=1521-4141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4141(199812)28:12%3C4362::AID-IMMU4362%3E3.0.CO;2-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69101509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4892-6c52c237ebf2f35e5a06f16be9dfad09c68ab28dec42bfaeb6cf190a0b5880ae3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17175436&rft_id=info:pmid/9862373&rfr_iscdi=true