How breast cancer treatment decisions are made by women in North Dakota

• Published in: The American journal of surgery 1998-12, Vol.176 (6), p.515-519
• Main Authors: Stafford, Douglas, Szczys, Robert, Becker, Ricky, Anderson, Julie, Bushfield, Susan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Aged; Breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Cancer therapies; Decision Making; Female; Health services; Humans; Mastectomy; Mastectomy, Radical; Mastectomy, Segmental; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; North Dakota; Patient Education as Topic; Patients; Physician-Patient Relations; Prognosis; Questionnaires; Radiation; Radiation Oncology; Radiation therapy; Rural Population; Statistical analysis; Surgeons; Surgery; Surveys; Teaching hospitals; Womens health
• ISSN: 0002-9610; 1879-1883
• DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00257-8

Background: Although equally effective, women in rural midwestern states choose modified radical mastectomy (MRM) over breast conservation surgery for early stage breast cancer. This study assessed treatment decisions by the women of North Dakota. Methods: Surveys were sent to women treated for early stage breast cancer from 1990 through 1992. Separate surveys were sent out to surgeons in the state. The questions assessed physician and patient perceptions of treatment and the decision making process. Results: A majority of surgeons believed that the long-term and disease-free survival was equal and that the preference for choosing MRM was due mostly to inconvenience of radiotherapy. The women reported that the surgeon was the most influential in the treatment decision and that concerns over radiation, duration of treatment, and travel restrictions all were factors in the decision. Conclusions: Education of surgeons and patients plus the early involvement of the radiation oncologist in discussing options is essential in the treatment of early stage breast cancer.