Mildly dyskaryotic smear results: does it matter what women know?

• Published in: Family practice 1998-12, Vol.15 (6), p.537-542
• Main Authors: Somerset, M, Baxter, K, Wilkinson, C, Peters, T J
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anxiety; Anxiety - etiology; Anxiety - psychology; Cervical cancer; Educational Measurement; Female; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Knowledge; Patient Education as Topic - methods; Relationship; Screening; Severity of Illness Index; Surveys and Questionnaires; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - classification; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - pathology; Uterine Cervical Dysplasia - psychology; Vaginal Smears - psychology; Women - education; Women - psychology
• ISSN: 0263-2136; 1460-2229; 1460-2229
• DOI: 10.1093/fampra/15.6.537

As of 1992, all women in the UK who have a first mildly dyskaryotic cervical smear are placed under surveillance for 6 months rather than being referred for immediate colposcopy. We aimed to explore the relationship between anxiety and understanding about mild dyskaryotic, and to propose and discuss a method of analysing free text comments written by participants in studies based on structured questionnaires. The freely scripted text of 236 women who had completed a questionnaire as part of a randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of an educational package was analysed. Randomization group status was concealed. Texts expressing similar views were grouped together and categorized. A matrix was drawn up to encompass the categories, and the comments were reallocated accordingly. Examination of the free text revealed two dimensions, concern and knowledge. There were no differences with respect to the apparent level of concern between the two randomization groups. However, comments from the intervention group were significantly more likely to have been classified as expressing good or vague knowledge than those from women in the control group. Although the educational intervention improved women's knowledge about the meaning of an abnormal smear result, this better knowledge was not correlated with less anxiety about the result. The free text analysis was a useful supplement to the main trial questionnaires. It demonstrated the existence of a range of understanding about cervical dyskaryosis, of anxieties relating to the receipt of such a result and the degree of interest women showed in acquiring further information.