Loading…
Estimated H-atom anisotropic displacement parameters: a comparison between different methods and with neutron diffraction results
Anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) are compared for H atoms estimated using three recently described procedures, both among themselves and with neutron diffraction results. The results convincingly demonstrate that all methods are capable of giving excellent results for several benchmark sys...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations of crystallography Foundations of crystallography, 2008-07, Vol.64 (4), p.465-475 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) are compared for H atoms estimated using three recently described procedures, both among themselves and with neutron diffraction results. The results convincingly demonstrate that all methods are capable of giving excellent results for several benchmark systems and identify systematic discrepancies for several atom types. A revised and extended library of internal H‐atom mean‐square displacements is presented for use with Madsen's SHADE web server [J. Appl. Cryst. (2006), 39, 757–758; http://shade.ki.ku.dk], and the improvement over the original SHADE results is substantial, suggesting that this is now the most readily and widely applicable of the three approximate procedures. Using this new library – SHADE2 – it is shown that, in line with expectations, a segmented rigid‐body description of the heavy atoms yields only a small improvement in the agreement with neutron results. The SHADE2 library, now incorporated in the SHADE web server, is recommended as a routine procedure for deriving estimates of H‐atom ADPs suitable for use in charge‐density studies on molecular crystals, and its widespread use should reveal remaining deficiencies and perhaps overcome the inherent bias in the majority of such studies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0108-7673 1600-5724 2053-2733 |
DOI: | 10.1107/S010876730801341X |