Delineation of the Structural Basis for the Activation Properties of the Dopamine D1 Receptor Subtypes

• Published in: The Journal of biological chemistry 1999-11, Vol.274 (45), p.31882-31890
• Main Authors: Iwasiow, Rafal M., Nantel, Marie-France, Tiberi, Mario
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amino Acid Sequence; Antipsychotic Agents - metabolism; Benzazepines - metabolism; Binding, Competitive; Cell Line; Dopamine - metabolism; Humans; Kinetics; Molecular Sequence Data; Protein Conformation; Receptors, Dopamine D1 - genetics; Receptors, Dopamine D1 - metabolism; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - chemistry; Recombinant Fusion Proteins - metabolism; Structure-Activity Relationship
• ISSN: 0021-9258; 1083-351X
• DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.45.31882

To delineate the structural determinants involved in the constitutive activation of the D1 receptor subtypes, we have constructed chimeras between the D1A and D1B receptors. These chimeras harbored a cognate domain corresponding to transmembrane regions 6 and 7 as well as the third extracellular loop (EL3) and cytoplasmic tail, a domain referred herein to as the terminal receptor locus (TRL). A chimeric D1A receptor harboring the D1B-TRL (chimera 1) displays an increased affinity for dopamine that is indistinguishable from the wild-type D1B receptor. Likewise, a chimeric D1B receptor containing the D1A-TRL cassette (chimera 2) binds dopamine with a reduced affinity that is highly reminiscent of the dopamine affinity for the wild-type D1A receptor. Furthermore, we show that the agonist independent activity of chimera 1 is identical to the wild-type D1B receptor whereas the chimera 2 displays a low agonist independent activity that is indistinguishable from the wild-type D1A receptor. Dopamine potencies for the wild-type D1A and D1B receptor were recapitulated in cells expressing the chimera 2 or chimera 1, respectively. However, the differences observed in agonist-mediated maximal activation of adenylyl cyclase elicited by the D1A and D1B receptors remain unchanged in cells expressing the chimeric receptors. To gain further mechanistic insights into the structural determinants of the TRL involved in the activation properties of the D1 receptor subtypes, we have engineered two additional chimeric D1 receptors that contain the EL3 region of their respective cognate wild-type counterparts (hD1A-EL3B and hD1B-EL3A). In marked contrast to chimera 1 and 2, dopamine affinity and constitutive activation were partially modulated by the exchange of the EL3. Meanwhile, hD1A-EL3B and hD1B-EL3A mutant receptors display a full switch in the agonist-mediated maximal activation, which is reminiscent of their cognate wild-type counterparts. Overall, our studies suggest a fundamental role for the TRL in shaping the intramolecular interactions implicated in the constitutive activation and coupling properties of the dopamine D1 receptor subtypes.