Loading…

Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology

This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recogni...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of audiology 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318
Main Authors: Iwaki, Takako, Blamey, Peter, Kubo, Takeshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93
container_end_page 318
container_issue 6
container_start_page 311
container_title International journal of audiology
container_volume 47
creator Iwaki, Takako
Blamey, Peter
Kubo, Takeshi
description This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14992020802130848
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69235755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69235755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMofv8AN9KV6KKatEmboBu_FQcGRNchTV5nIm0zJq0y_nojMyAi6CqP5NzLy0Foj-Bjgjk-IVSIDGdxzEiOOeUraJOUmKec8GI1zvE9jUC5gbZCeMGYlJTxdbRBOCsEwfkmeriwrTOqSUI_GAshGYLtJokyatbbN0jMvFOt1YlX3QQSFy9b-6F667rk8PzqcXyU9KCnnWvcZL6D1mrVBNhdntvo-eb66fIuHY1v7y_PR6mmOetTIjTTPAMoFONgQGDQXBvKtQClKsBEQ1GV2NSGUlNkrK6AZiJnXFBmKpFvo4NF78y71wFCL1sbNDSN6sANQcbPlYSS4l-wEFnOSsYiSBag9i4ED7WcedsqP5cEyy_V8pfqmNlflg9VC-Y7sXQbgbMFYLva-Va9O98Y2at543wdfWobZP5X_-mP-BRU00-18iBf3OC7aPiP7T4BMVGe-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69235755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14992020802130848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18569103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>ADRO ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Speech ; Bimodal ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Deafness - therapy ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; HAMOC ; Hearing aid ; Humans ; Japanese hearing in noise test ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Sound Localization ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318</ispartof><rights>2008 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31247</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18569103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blamey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</description><subject>ADRO</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Bimodal</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>HAMOC</subject><subject>Hearing aid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japanese hearing in noise test</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMofv8AN9KV6KKatEmboBu_FQcGRNchTV5nIm0zJq0y_nojMyAi6CqP5NzLy0Foj-Bjgjk-IVSIDGdxzEiOOeUraJOUmKec8GI1zvE9jUC5gbZCeMGYlJTxdbRBOCsEwfkmeriwrTOqSUI_GAshGYLtJokyatbbN0jMvFOt1YlX3QQSFy9b-6F667rk8PzqcXyU9KCnnWvcZL6D1mrVBNhdntvo-eb66fIuHY1v7y_PR6mmOetTIjTTPAMoFONgQGDQXBvKtQClKsBEQ1GV2NSGUlNkrK6AZiJnXFBmKpFvo4NF78y71wFCL1sbNDSN6sANQcbPlYSS4l-wEFnOSsYiSBag9i4ED7WcedsqP5cEyy_V8pfqmNlflg9VC-Y7sXQbgbMFYLva-Va9O98Y2at543wdfWobZP5X_-mP-BRU00-18iBf3OC7aPiP7T4BMVGe-g</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Iwaki, Takako</creator><creator>Blamey, Peter</creator><creator>Kubo, Takeshi</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><author>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ADRO</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Bimodal</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>HAMOC</topic><topic>Hearing aid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japanese hearing in noise test</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blamey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwaki, Takako</au><au>Blamey, Peter</au><au>Kubo, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>311-318</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>18569103</pmid><doi>10.1080/14992020802130848</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1499-2027
ispartof International journal of audiology, 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318
issn 1499-2027
1708-8186
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69235755
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects ADRO
Adult
Aged
Audiometry, Speech
Bimodal
Cochlear implant
Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation
Cochlear Implants
Deafness - diagnosis
Deafness - therapy
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
HAMOC
Hearing aid
Humans
Japanese hearing in noise test
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
Sound Localization
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T22%3A56%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bimodal%20studies%20using%20adaptive%20dynamic%20range%20optimization%20(ADRO)%20technology&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Iwaki,%20Takako&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=311-318&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14992020802130848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E69235755%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69235755&rft_id=info:pmid/18569103&rfr_iscdi=true