Loading…
Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology
This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recogni...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of audiology 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93 |
container_end_page | 318 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 311 |
container_title | International journal of audiology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Iwaki, Takako Blamey, Peter Kubo, Takeshi |
description | This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/14992020802130848 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69235755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69235755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMofv8AN9KV6KKatEmboBu_FQcGRNchTV5nIm0zJq0y_nojMyAi6CqP5NzLy0Foj-Bjgjk-IVSIDGdxzEiOOeUraJOUmKec8GI1zvE9jUC5gbZCeMGYlJTxdbRBOCsEwfkmeriwrTOqSUI_GAshGYLtJokyatbbN0jMvFOt1YlX3QQSFy9b-6F667rk8PzqcXyU9KCnnWvcZL6D1mrVBNhdntvo-eb66fIuHY1v7y_PR6mmOetTIjTTPAMoFONgQGDQXBvKtQClKsBEQ1GV2NSGUlNkrK6AZiJnXFBmKpFvo4NF78y71wFCL1sbNDSN6sANQcbPlYSS4l-wEFnOSsYiSBag9i4ED7WcedsqP5cEyy_V8pfqmNlflg9VC-Y7sXQbgbMFYLva-Va9O98Y2at543wdfWobZP5X_-mP-BRU00-18iBf3OC7aPiP7T4BMVGe-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69235755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14992020802130848</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18569103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>ADRO ; Adult ; Aged ; Audiometry, Speech ; Bimodal ; Cochlear implant ; Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation ; Cochlear Implants ; Deafness - diagnosis ; Deafness - therapy ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; HAMOC ; Hearing aid ; Humans ; Japanese hearing in noise test ; Middle Aged ; Patient Satisfaction ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Sound Localization ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>International journal of audiology, 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318</ispartof><rights>2008 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31247</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18569103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blamey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><title>International journal of audiology</title><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><description>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</description><subject>ADRO</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Bimodal</subject><subject>Cochlear implant</subject><subject>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cochlear Implants</subject><subject>Deafness - diagnosis</subject><subject>Deafness - therapy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>HAMOC</subject><subject>Hearing aid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Japanese hearing in noise test</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Sound Localization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1499-2027</issn><issn>1708-8186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAURYMofv8AN9KV6KKatEmboBu_FQcGRNchTV5nIm0zJq0y_nojMyAi6CqP5NzLy0Foj-Bjgjk-IVSIDGdxzEiOOeUraJOUmKec8GI1zvE9jUC5gbZCeMGYlJTxdbRBOCsEwfkmeriwrTOqSUI_GAshGYLtJokyatbbN0jMvFOt1YlX3QQSFy9b-6F667rk8PzqcXyU9KCnnWvcZL6D1mrVBNhdntvo-eb66fIuHY1v7y_PR6mmOetTIjTTPAMoFONgQGDQXBvKtQClKsBEQ1GV2NSGUlNkrK6AZiJnXFBmKpFvo4NF78y71wFCL1sbNDSN6sANQcbPlYSS4l-wEFnOSsYiSBag9i4ED7WcedsqP5cEyy_V8pfqmNlflg9VC-Y7sXQbgbMFYLva-Va9O98Y2at543wdfWobZP5X_-mP-BRU00-18iBf3OC7aPiP7T4BMVGe-g</recordid><startdate>200806</startdate><enddate>200806</enddate><creator>Iwaki, Takako</creator><creator>Blamey, Peter</creator><creator>Kubo, Takeshi</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200806</creationdate><title>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</title><author>Iwaki, Takako ; Blamey, Peter ; Kubo, Takeshi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>ADRO</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Bimodal</topic><topic>Cochlear implant</topic><topic>Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cochlear Implants</topic><topic>Deafness - diagnosis</topic><topic>Deafness - therapy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>HAMOC</topic><topic>Hearing aid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Japanese hearing in noise test</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Sound Localization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwaki, Takako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blamey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwaki, Takako</au><au>Blamey, Peter</au><au>Kubo, Takeshi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology</atitle><jtitle>International journal of audiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Audiol</addtitle><date>2008-06</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>311-318</pages><issn>1499-2027</issn><eissn>1708-8186</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO®) processing for six bimodal listeners who used a hearing aid in one ear and a cochlear implant in the other. 'Bimodal' refers to the use of acoustic and electrical stimulation together. Bimodal speech recognition thresholds with the Japanese hearing in noise test were significantly lower for two ADRO devices than two non-ADRO devices in quiet, in noise from the front, and in noise from the implanted side. When the noise was presented from the non-implanted side there was no significant difference between the ADRO and non-ADRO conditions. The hearing aid measure of contrast questionnaire indicated that participants preferred ADRO in 77.3% of situations. ADRO was especially preferred in more difficult situations. The ADRO processing was designed for use in bimodal prostheses, and this study confirmed that speech intelligibility and sound quality improvements are obtainable by using ADRO in a bimodal context.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>18569103</pmid><doi>10.1080/14992020802130848</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1499-2027 |
ispartof | International journal of audiology, 2008-06, Vol.47 (6), p.311-318 |
issn | 1499-2027 1708-8186 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69235755 |
source | Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | ADRO Adult Aged Audiometry, Speech Bimodal Cochlear implant Cochlear Implantation - instrumentation Cochlear Implants Deafness - diagnosis Deafness - therapy Equipment Design Female Follow-Up Studies HAMOC Hearing aid Humans Japanese hearing in noise test Middle Aged Patient Satisfaction Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Sound Localization Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Bimodal studies using adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO) technology |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T22%3A56%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bimodal%20studies%20using%20adaptive%20dynamic%20range%20optimization%20(ADRO)%20technology&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20audiology&rft.au=Iwaki,%20Takako&rft.date=2008-06&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=311-318&rft.issn=1499-2027&rft.eissn=1708-8186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14992020802130848&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E69235755%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c435t-19c5c82ee6a58ede90ec8cd48c9eaabe01ce6b70dfd44d625fbe429358945db93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69235755&rft_id=info:pmid/18569103&rfr_iscdi=true |