Loading…

Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam

Despite certain shortcomings, boiling is still the most common means of treating water in the home and the benchmark against which alternative household-based disinfection and filtration methods must be measured. We assessed the microbiological effectiveness and cost of boiling among a vulnerable po...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental science & technology 2008-06, Vol.42 (12), p.4255-4260
Main Authors: Clasen, Thomas F, Thao, Do Hoang, Boisson, Sophie, Shipin, Oleg
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153
container_end_page 4260
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4255
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 42
creator Clasen, Thomas F
Thao, Do Hoang
Boisson, Sophie
Shipin, Oleg
description Despite certain shortcomings, boiling is still the most common means of treating water in the home and the benchmark against which alternative household-based disinfection and filtration methods must be measured. We assessed the microbiological effectiveness and cost of boiling among a vulnerable population relying on unimproved water sources and commonly practicing boiling as a means of disinfecting water. In a 12 week study among 50 households from a rural community in Vietnam, boiling was associated with a 97% reduction in geometric mean thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs) (p < 0.001). Despite high levels of faecal contamination in source water, 37% of stored water samples from self-reported boilers met the WHO standard for safe drinking water (0 TTC/100 mL), and 38.3% fell within the low risk category (1–10 TTC/100 mL). Nevertheless, 60.5% of stored drinking water samples were positive for TTC, with 22.2% falling into the medium risk category (11–100 TTC/100 mL). The estimated cost of wood used to boil water was US$ 0.272 per month for wood collectors and US$ 1.68 per month for wood purchasers, representing approximately 0.48% to 1.04%, respectively, of the average monthly income of participating households.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es7024802
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69294948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69294948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1vFCEYB3DSaNrt2oNfwBATm3gYCwwwzNF9qbpd-25rPEgYhmnozsIWZox-e9nspk300BMJ_PLneQHgNUYfMCL4yMQCESoQ2QEDzAjKmGD4BRgghPOszPn3PbAf4z1CiORI7II9LDhijOIB-PnV6uAr61t_Z7Vq4bRpjO7sL-NMjFC5Go597KBv4Mjb1ro72Hk4sdG6tYOTYN1ifXurOhOgdfCyDynmxprOqeUr8LJRbTQH23MIvh1Pr8efs_nZpy_jj_NM0YJ1GatrTDRnpNFCcyp4UdJSqboiTU5oQQpCNa0FZaWqG1OhmgttjBKCkIpSzPIhONzkroJ_6E3s5NJGbdpWOeP7KHlJUiIVz0KCylwUvEjw7T_w3vfBpSZkGiLmFJd5Qu83KM0wxmAauQp2qcIfiZFcr0Y-ribZN9vAvlqa-klud5FAtgE2dub347sKC5nqKZi8Pr-SVyez0ez0x7m8SP7dxisdn4r7_-O_feejCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230164193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Clasen, Thomas F ; Thao, Do Hoang ; Boisson, Sophie ; Shipin, Oleg</creator><creatorcontrib>Clasen, Thomas F ; Thao, Do Hoang ; Boisson, Sophie ; Shipin, Oleg</creatorcontrib><description>Despite certain shortcomings, boiling is still the most common means of treating water in the home and the benchmark against which alternative household-based disinfection and filtration methods must be measured. We assessed the microbiological effectiveness and cost of boiling among a vulnerable population relying on unimproved water sources and commonly practicing boiling as a means of disinfecting water. In a 12 week study among 50 households from a rural community in Vietnam, boiling was associated with a 97% reduction in geometric mean thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs) (p &lt; 0.001). Despite high levels of faecal contamination in source water, 37% of stored water samples from self-reported boilers met the WHO standard for safe drinking water (0 TTC/100 mL), and 38.3% fell within the low risk category (1–10 TTC/100 mL). Nevertheless, 60.5% of stored drinking water samples were positive for TTC, with 22.2% falling into the medium risk category (11–100 TTC/100 mL). The estimated cost of wood used to boil water was US$ 0.272 per month for wood collectors and US$ 1.68 per month for wood purchasers, representing approximately 0.48% to 1.04%, respectively, of the average monthly income of participating households.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es7024802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18605541</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis ; Data Collection ; Demography ; Disinfection &amp; disinfectants ; Disinfection - economics ; Drinking water ; Environmental science ; Filters ; Hot Temperature ; Microbiology ; Remediation and Control Technologies ; Rural areas ; Rural Health ; Vietnam ; Water Microbiology ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2008-06, Vol.42 (12), p.4255-4260</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Jun 15, 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18605541$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clasen, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thao, Do Hoang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boisson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipin, Oleg</creatorcontrib><title>Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Despite certain shortcomings, boiling is still the most common means of treating water in the home and the benchmark against which alternative household-based disinfection and filtration methods must be measured. We assessed the microbiological effectiveness and cost of boiling among a vulnerable population relying on unimproved water sources and commonly practicing boiling as a means of disinfecting water. In a 12 week study among 50 households from a rural community in Vietnam, boiling was associated with a 97% reduction in geometric mean thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs) (p &lt; 0.001). Despite high levels of faecal contamination in source water, 37% of stored water samples from self-reported boilers met the WHO standard for safe drinking water (0 TTC/100 mL), and 38.3% fell within the low risk category (1–10 TTC/100 mL). Nevertheless, 60.5% of stored drinking water samples were positive for TTC, with 22.2% falling into the medium risk category (11–100 TTC/100 mL). The estimated cost of wood used to boil water was US$ 0.272 per month for wood collectors and US$ 1.68 per month for wood purchasers, representing approximately 0.48% to 1.04%, respectively, of the average monthly income of participating households.</description><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfection - economics</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Filters</subject><subject>Hot Temperature</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Remediation and Control Technologies</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural Health</subject><subject>Vietnam</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1vFCEYB3DSaNrt2oNfwBATm3gYCwwwzNF9qbpd-25rPEgYhmnozsIWZox-e9nspk300BMJ_PLneQHgNUYfMCL4yMQCESoQ2QEDzAjKmGD4BRgghPOszPn3PbAf4z1CiORI7II9LDhijOIB-PnV6uAr61t_Z7Vq4bRpjO7sL-NMjFC5Go597KBv4Mjb1ro72Hk4sdG6tYOTYN1ifXurOhOgdfCyDynmxprOqeUr8LJRbTQH23MIvh1Pr8efs_nZpy_jj_NM0YJ1GatrTDRnpNFCcyp4UdJSqboiTU5oQQpCNa0FZaWqG1OhmgttjBKCkIpSzPIhONzkroJ_6E3s5NJGbdpWOeP7KHlJUiIVz0KCylwUvEjw7T_w3vfBpSZkGiLmFJd5Qu83KM0wxmAauQp2qcIfiZFcr0Y-ribZN9vAvlqa-klud5FAtgE2dub347sKC5nqKZi8Pr-SVyez0ez0x7m8SP7dxisdn4r7_-O_feejCA</recordid><startdate>20080615</startdate><enddate>20080615</enddate><creator>Clasen, Thomas F</creator><creator>Thao, Do Hoang</creator><creator>Boisson, Sophie</creator><creator>Shipin, Oleg</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080615</creationdate><title>Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam</title><author>Clasen, Thomas F ; Thao, Do Hoang ; Boisson, Sophie ; Shipin, Oleg</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfection - economics</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Filters</topic><topic>Hot Temperature</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Remediation and Control Technologies</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural Health</topic><topic>Vietnam</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clasen, Thomas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thao, Do Hoang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boisson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shipin, Oleg</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clasen, Thomas F</au><au>Thao, Do Hoang</au><au>Boisson, Sophie</au><au>Shipin, Oleg</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2008-06-15</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4255</spage><epage>4260</epage><pages>4255-4260</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Despite certain shortcomings, boiling is still the most common means of treating water in the home and the benchmark against which alternative household-based disinfection and filtration methods must be measured. We assessed the microbiological effectiveness and cost of boiling among a vulnerable population relying on unimproved water sources and commonly practicing boiling as a means of disinfecting water. In a 12 week study among 50 households from a rural community in Vietnam, boiling was associated with a 97% reduction in geometric mean thermotolerant coliforms (TTCs) (p &lt; 0.001). Despite high levels of faecal contamination in source water, 37% of stored water samples from self-reported boilers met the WHO standard for safe drinking water (0 TTC/100 mL), and 38.3% fell within the low risk category (1–10 TTC/100 mL). Nevertheless, 60.5% of stored drinking water samples were positive for TTC, with 22.2% falling into the medium risk category (11–100 TTC/100 mL). The estimated cost of wood used to boil water was US$ 0.272 per month for wood collectors and US$ 1.68 per month for wood purchasers, representing approximately 0.48% to 1.04%, respectively, of the average monthly income of participating households.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>18605541</pmid><doi>10.1021/es7024802</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2008-06, Vol.42 (12), p.4255-4260
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69294948
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Costs and Cost Analysis
Data Collection
Demography
Disinfection & disinfectants
Disinfection - economics
Drinking water
Environmental science
Filters
Hot Temperature
Microbiology
Remediation and Control Technologies
Rural areas
Rural Health
Vietnam
Water Microbiology
Water Supply
title Microbiological Effectiveness and Cost of Boiling to Disinfect Drinking Water in Rural Vietnam
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T05%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbiological%20Effectiveness%20and%20Cost%20of%20Boiling%20to%20Disinfect%20Drinking%20Water%20in%20Rural%20Vietnam&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Clasen,%20Thomas%20F&rft.date=2008-06-15&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4255&rft.epage=4260&rft.pages=4255-4260&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es7024802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E69294948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a475t-5dd12c652fc8c64867949aadb2f32472724c4d8459adfeb0d68ceea8822b44153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230164193&rft_id=info:pmid/18605541&rfr_iscdi=true