A Controlled Daytime Challenge of Motor Performance and Vigilance in Sleep Bruxers

• Published in: Journal of dental research 1999-11, Vol.78 (11), p.1754-1762
• Main Authors: Major, M., Rompre, P.H., Guitard, F., Tenbokum, L., O'Connor, K., Nielsen, T., Lavigne, G.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Arousal - physiology; Circadian Rhythm - physiology; Dentistry; Electrocardiography - statistics & numerical data; Electroencephalography - statistics & numerical data; Electromyography - statistics & numerical data; Female; Humans; Male; Masticatory Muscles - physiology; Motor Activity - physiology; Patient Selection; Reaction Time - physiology; Sleep Bruxism - physiopathology; Sleep Bruxism - psychology; Statistics, Nonparametric
• ISSN: 0022-0345; 1544-0591
• DOI: 10.1177/00220345990780111301

Many etiological factors have been suggested for sleep bruxism. Among these, elevated mental and physical alertness has been proposed to characterize sleep bruxers. The present study tests the hypothesis that, during the daytime, sleep bruxers are more vigilant and more prone to react to a motor command than are control subjects. Seven sleep bruxers, diagnosed polysomnographically according to validated research criteria, were matched for age and gender to seven control subjects. A simple reaction time task was selected to assess daytime vigilance and motor responsiveness. The following physiological measures were recorded: reaction time, error rate, electroencephalography, electrocardiography, electromyography, and video detection of body movements. Analysis of these variables showed no differences between groups. During the test, bruxers and controls showed a parallel decrease in EEG vigilance and heart rate over time. Frequency of orofacial and body movements was the same in both groups, and no clenching activity was observed during the experimental test. Subjects' visual analog scale ratings revealed that both controls and bruxers were more competitive after the test than before, and bruxers were slightly more anxious than controls before and after the test. Together, the results indicate that sleep bruxers are neither more vigilant nor more prone to react to a motor command during the daytime than are control subjects.