The effects of experimental parameters and calibration on MTDSC data

To produce accurate and artefact-free MTDSC data it is necessary to choose suitable experimental parameters (i.e. modulation period, temperature amplitude, sample mass and pan type). A poor choice of parameters can result in distortion of the modulation and inaccurate heat capacity data and can also...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of pharmaceutics 1999-12, Vol.192 (1), p.21-32
Main Authors: Hill, Vivienne L., Craig, Duncan Q.M., Feely, Liam C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aluminum Oxide
Analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Calibration
Calorimetry, Differential Scanning
Experimental parameters
General pharmacology
Heat capacity
Medical sciences
Modulation
MTDSC
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Software
Temperature
Thermodynamics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To produce accurate and artefact-free MTDSC data it is necessary to choose suitable experimental parameters (i.e. modulation period, temperature amplitude, sample mass and pan type). A poor choice of parameters can result in distortion of the modulation and inaccurate heat capacity data and can also affect the result of the deconvolution procedure. This paper aims to review these effects and to offer some guidance on how to achieve optimum results. In particular, it is suggested that the modulation parameters should be chosen to ensure that the sample can follow the programme without thermal gradients developing and also that at least six modulations should take place during any thermal transition. Two methods of calibration are discussed; a one-point method is sufficient in most cases but a temperature-dependent method should be used when more accurate data are required or for sub-ambient experiments.
ISSN:0378-5173
1873-3476
DOI:10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00268-9