Online Weight Training

• Published in: Journal of strength and conditioning research 2008-07, Vol.22 (4), p.1164-1168
• Main Authors: McNamara, John M, Swalm, Ricky L, Stearne, David J, Covassin, Tracey M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; College students; Colleges & universities; Computer-Assisted Instruction; Exercise; Female; Humans; Internet; Kinesiology; Knowledge; Learning; Male; Medical screening; Muscle Strength; Physical Education and Training - methods; Physical fitness; Social interaction; Sports medicine; Weight Lifting; Weightlifting
• ISSN: 1064-8011; 1533-4287
• DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816eb4e0

McNamara, JM, Swalm, RL, Stearne, DJ, Covassin, TM. Online weight training. J Strength Cond Res 22, 1164-1168, 2008-The purpose of this study was to determine how a traditional weight training class compared to nontraditional classes that were heavily laden with technology. Could students learn resistance exercises by watching video demonstrations over the Internet? Three university weight training classes, each lasting 16 weeks, were compared. Each class had the same curriculum and workout requirements but different attendance requirements. The online group made extensive use of the Internet and was allowed to complete the workouts on their own at any gym that was convenient for them. Seventy-nine college-aged students were randomized into 3 groupstraditional (n = 27), hybrid (n = 25), and online (n = 27). They completed pretest and posttest measures on upper-body strength (i.e., bench press), lower-body strength (i.e., back squat), and knowledge (i.e., written exam). The results indicated that all 3 groups showed significant improvement in knowledge (p < 0.05). The online group did not require the students to attend class and may have resulted in significantly lower scores on the bench press (p < 0.05) and squats (p < 0.05). This study indicates that an online weight training course may improve knowledge but not strength. Possible reasons for a lack of improvement in the online group included lack of motivation, low accountability, and the possibility that the self-reported workouts were not accurate. These results suggest that there is a limit to how much technology can be used in a weight training class. If this limit is exceeded, some type of monitoring system appears necessary to ensure that students are actually completing their workouts.