Loading…
Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity
Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique for estimating test performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) of DNA-amplification tests for detecting infectious diseases. It has recently been claimed that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of specificity are typically less biased tha...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 1999-12, Vol.52 (12), p.1231-1237 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-18dcf59e95fae9e8f26f8589db06e80a0e0c8472f11c2c9ae137409e5077c7093 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1237 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1231 |
container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Hadgu, Alula |
description | Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique for estimating test performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) of DNA-amplification tests for detecting infectious diseases. It has recently been claimed that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of specificity are typically less biased than those based on culture and that the discrepant analysis–based specificity shows little appreciable bias. In this article, I show that those conclusions are incorrect. Using a typical example from the published literature, I show that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of sensitivity and specificity can generate a significant and clinically important overestimation of the true sensitivity and specificity values. Moreover, I demonstrate that the concept of discrepant analysis is profoundly flawed and unscientific. It violates a fundamental principle of diagnostic testing—the principle that the new test should not be used to determine the true disease status. Thus, the major problem with discrepant analysis is not only that it is biased but that it is unscientific. Therefore, discrepant analysis should not be adopted for the evaluation of any diagnostic or screening test. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00101-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69327398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435699001018</els_id><sourcerecordid>69327398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-18dcf59e95fae9e8f26f8589db06e80a0e0c8472f11c2c9ae137409e5077c7093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1PAyEQhonRaP34CRoOxuhhFXaXBbyY-m1S46H1TJAdFLNl60Kb9N_L1qqHCRnyzJt550XokJJzSmh1MSZCsqwsWHUq5Rkh6TMTG2hABRcZkzndRIM_ZAfthvCZIE4420Y7lDBBuOAD9HHrgulgpn3EQ6-bZXDhEg_xtdMBaqx9X_jVB-PAR2edwc8QP9oa27bDdyG6qY7Ov-MJhIjH4IOLbuHicjU6noHpZ1K_j7asbgIcrN899Hp_N7l5zEYvD083w1FmirKMGRW1sUyCZFaDBGHzygomZP1GKhBEEyBGlDy3lJrcSA204CWRwAjnhhNZ7KGTH91Z137N01JqmhxC02gP7TyoShY5L6RI4NEanL9NoVazLlnplur3Ngk4XgM6GN3YTnvjwj9HZc5pr3P1g0FytXDQqdWtDNSuAxNV3bqkqfrQ1Co01SeipFSr0JQovgFqm4hU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69327398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Hadgu, Alula</creator><creatorcontrib>Hadgu, Alula</creatorcontrib><description>Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique for estimating test performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) of DNA-amplification tests for detecting infectious diseases. It has recently been claimed that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of specificity are typically less biased than those based on culture and that the discrepant analysis–based specificity shows little appreciable bias. In this article, I show that those conclusions are incorrect. Using a typical example from the published literature, I show that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of sensitivity and specificity can generate a significant and clinically important overestimation of the true sensitivity and specificity values. Moreover, I demonstrate that the concept of discrepant analysis is profoundly flawed and unscientific. It violates a fundamental principle of diagnostic testing—the principle that the new test should not be used to determine the true disease status. Thus, the major problem with discrepant analysis is not only that it is biased but that it is unscientific. Therefore, discrepant analysis should not be adopted for the evaluation of any diagnostic or screening test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00101-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10580787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Bacterial diseases of the genital system ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis ; Chlamydia Infections - microbiology ; Chlamydia trachomatis ; Chlamydia trachomatis - genetics ; Discrepant analysis ; Discriminant Analysis ; DNA, Bacterial - analysis ; DNA-amplification tests ; Gene Amplification ; Human bacterial diseases ; Humans ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Models, Theoretical ; Observer Variation ; sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1999-12, Vol.52 (12), p.1231-1237</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-18dcf59e95fae9e8f26f8589db06e80a0e0c8472f11c2c9ae137409e5077c7093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1192718$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10580787$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hadgu, Alula</creatorcontrib><title>Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique for estimating test performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) of DNA-amplification tests for detecting infectious diseases. It has recently been claimed that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of specificity are typically less biased than those based on culture and that the discrepant analysis–based specificity shows little appreciable bias. In this article, I show that those conclusions are incorrect. Using a typical example from the published literature, I show that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of sensitivity and specificity can generate a significant and clinically important overestimation of the true sensitivity and specificity values. Moreover, I demonstrate that the concept of discrepant analysis is profoundly flawed and unscientific. It violates a fundamental principle of diagnostic testing—the principle that the new test should not be used to determine the true disease status. Thus, the major problem with discrepant analysis is not only that it is biased but that it is unscientific. Therefore, discrepant analysis should not be adopted for the evaluation of any diagnostic or screening test.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chlamydia Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis</subject><subject>Chlamydia trachomatis - genetics</subject><subject>Discrepant analysis</subject><subject>Discriminant Analysis</subject><subject>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>DNA-amplification tests</subject><subject>Gene Amplification</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>specificity</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkU1PAyEQhonRaP34CRoOxuhhFXaXBbyY-m1S46H1TJAdFLNl60Kb9N_L1qqHCRnyzJt550XokJJzSmh1MSZCsqwsWHUq5Rkh6TMTG2hABRcZkzndRIM_ZAfthvCZIE4420Y7lDBBuOAD9HHrgulgpn3EQ6-bZXDhEg_xtdMBaqx9X_jVB-PAR2edwc8QP9oa27bDdyG6qY7Ov-MJhIjH4IOLbuHicjU6noHpZ1K_j7asbgIcrN899Hp_N7l5zEYvD083w1FmirKMGRW1sUyCZFaDBGHzygomZP1GKhBEEyBGlDy3lJrcSA204CWRwAjnhhNZ7KGTH91Z137N01JqmhxC02gP7TyoShY5L6RI4NEanL9NoVazLlnplur3Ngk4XgM6GN3YTnvjwj9HZc5pr3P1g0FytXDQqdWtDNSuAxNV3bqkqfrQ1Co01SeipFSr0JQovgFqm4hU</recordid><startdate>19991201</startdate><enddate>19991201</enddate><creator>Hadgu, Alula</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991201</creationdate><title>Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity</title><author>Hadgu, Alula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-18dcf59e95fae9e8f26f8589db06e80a0e0c8472f11c2c9ae137409e5077c7093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Bacterial diseases of the genital system</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chlamydia Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis</topic><topic>Chlamydia trachomatis - genetics</topic><topic>Discrepant analysis</topic><topic>Discriminant Analysis</topic><topic>DNA, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>DNA-amplification tests</topic><topic>Gene Amplification</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadgu, Alula</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadgu, Alula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1999-12-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1231</spage><epage>1237</epage><pages>1231-1237</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>Discrepant analysis is a widely used technique for estimating test performance indices (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) of DNA-amplification tests for detecting infectious diseases. It has recently been claimed that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of specificity are typically less biased than those based on culture and that the discrepant analysis–based specificity shows little appreciable bias. In this article, I show that those conclusions are incorrect. Using a typical example from the published literature, I show that the discrepant analysis–based estimates of sensitivity and specificity can generate a significant and clinically important overestimation of the true sensitivity and specificity values. Moreover, I demonstrate that the concept of discrepant analysis is profoundly flawed and unscientific. It violates a fundamental principle of diagnostic testing—the principle that the new test should not be used to determine the true disease status. Thus, the major problem with discrepant analysis is not only that it is biased but that it is unscientific. Therefore, discrepant analysis should not be adopted for the evaluation of any diagnostic or screening test.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>10580787</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00101-8</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 1999-12, Vol.52 (12), p.1231-1237 |
issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69327398 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Bacterial diseases Bacterial diseases of the genital system Biological and medical sciences Chlamydia Infections - diagnosis Chlamydia Infections - microbiology Chlamydia trachomatis Chlamydia trachomatis - genetics Discrepant analysis Discriminant Analysis DNA, Bacterial - analysis DNA-amplification tests Gene Amplification Human bacterial diseases Humans Infectious diseases Medical sciences Models, Theoretical Observer Variation sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity specificity |
title | Discrepant Analysis: A Biased and an Unscientific Method for Estimating Test Sensitivity and Specificity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T19%3A20%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discrepant%20Analysis:%20A%20Biased%20and%20an%20Unscientific%20Method%20for%20Estimating%20Test%20Sensitivity%20and%20Specificity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Hadgu,%20Alula&rft.date=1999-12-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1231&rft.epage=1237&rft.pages=1231-1237&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00101-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E69327398%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-18dcf59e95fae9e8f26f8589db06e80a0e0c8472f11c2c9ae137409e5077c7093%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69327398&rft_id=info:pmid/10580787&rfr_iscdi=true |