Loading…
Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples
This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dairy science 2008-08, Vol.91 (8), p.3114-3118 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3 |
container_end_page | 3118 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3114 |
container_title | Journal of dairy science |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Gonzalo, C. Linage, B. Carriedo, J.A. De La Fuente, L.F. |
description | This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A total of 101 composite ovine milk samples (50 from Assaf ewes and 51 from Churra ewes), ranging between 50×103 and 2,200×103 cells/mL, were divided into 10 aliquots/milk to be analyzed by DCC. Four undiluted aliquots and 4 aliquots diluted 1:1 in PBS were analyzed by using soak times of 0, 1, 2, and 3 min/aliquot, and the other 2 aliquots were diluted 1:1 in propidium iodide or ethidium bromide staining solutions and analyzed by DCC. Milk samples were also analyzed by the Fossomatic method, as a reference. All analyses were carried out in duplicate. Undiluted milk samples with soak times ≥1min showed large coefficients of regression (b=0.96 to 0.98) and correlation (r>0.99) when compared with the Fossomatic method. In these samples, DCC gave repeatability standard deviations (sr=35 to 51×103 cells/mL) lower than other DCC analytical conditions (sr=49 to 74×103 cells/mL), and their log SCC means (5.51 to 5.52) were close to the reference value (5.56). The log SCC means corresponding to samples diluted 1:1 in staining solutions (5.55) did not differ from the reference value; however, these aliquots had lower regression coefficients (b: 0.92 to 0.93). Samples diluted 1:1 in PBS and undiluted samples with a 0-min soak time showed a global accuracy similar to or lower than undiluted samples with soak times ≥1min. Breed did not seem to affect the results. We concluded that undiluted raw milk with a soak time ≥1min and analyzed by DCC shows suitable overall accuracy in ovine milk compared with the reference method and can be considered as the best option for on-farm use from an operational point of view. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3168/jds.2008-1026 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69347296</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030208711068</els_id><sourcerecordid>1553314611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEotvCkSuykOCW4o98ONyqtHxIi3rY9mw59pj1NrEXO1nU38UfrMMGipA42eN55p0Zv1n2iuBzRir-fqfjOcWY5wTT6km2IiUtc0Ya_jRbYUxpjhmmJ9lpjLsUEorL59kJ4VWJKa9X2c_N1ocRtX4YJmeVHK13H9DVQfbTrzvyBo1bQNcHCLLv0YVSU5Dq_vf7JaxlglELKdn6yY0QkPEBbfyQBNRfCWRdkrEO0Ffb36UmxoAaZ6GNl3foxg4wI5e2n0bQSDqNbp1eorkEbeSw7yG-yJ4Z2Ud4uZxn2e3Hq5v2c76-_vSlvVjnqqiqMVc156w2XNNSVYwUVGvCOsq4YVqbpgZc1kAMrSkDjpuOm6ppOlMQhuuulB07y94ddffBf58gjmKwUaV9pAM_RVE1rKhpUyXwzT_gzk_BpdkEaUpOKcdFgvIjpIKPMYAR-2AHGe4FwWK2UiQrxWylmK1M_OtFdOoG0I_04l0C3i6AjEr2JkinbPzDJacLzDl9XGNrv21_2AAiDsnKJEvmlg0RPPUn84T1EYT0qQcLQURlwSnQqUiNQnv7n1kfAMMUxoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195822804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples</title><source>ScienceDirect</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Gonzalo, C. ; Linage, B. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; De La Fuente, L.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C. ; Linage, B. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; De La Fuente, L.F.</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A total of 101 composite ovine milk samples (50 from Assaf ewes and 51 from Churra ewes), ranging between 50×103 and 2,200×103 cells/mL, were divided into 10 aliquots/milk to be analyzed by DCC. Four undiluted aliquots and 4 aliquots diluted 1:1 in PBS were analyzed by using soak times of 0, 1, 2, and 3 min/aliquot, and the other 2 aliquots were diluted 1:1 in propidium iodide or ethidium bromide staining solutions and analyzed by DCC. Milk samples were also analyzed by the Fossomatic method, as a reference. All analyses were carried out in duplicate. Undiluted milk samples with soak times ≥1min showed large coefficients of regression (b=0.96 to 0.98) and correlation (r>0.99) when compared with the Fossomatic method. In these samples, DCC gave repeatability standard deviations (sr=35 to 51×103 cells/mL) lower than other DCC analytical conditions (sr=49 to 74×103 cells/mL), and their log SCC means (5.51 to 5.52) were close to the reference value (5.56). The log SCC means corresponding to samples diluted 1:1 in staining solutions (5.55) did not differ from the reference value; however, these aliquots had lower regression coefficients (b: 0.92 to 0.93). Samples diluted 1:1 in PBS and undiluted samples with a 0-min soak time showed a global accuracy similar to or lower than undiluted samples with soak times ≥1min. Breed did not seem to affect the results. We concluded that undiluted raw milk with a soak time ≥1min and analyzed by DCC shows suitable overall accuracy in ovine milk compared with the reference method and can be considered as the best option for on-farm use from an operational point of view.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1026</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18650287</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JDSCAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Savoy, IL: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>accuracy ; Animal productions ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breeding ; Cell Count - instrumentation ; Cell Count - veterinary ; DeLaval cell counter ; Ethidium ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Least-Squares Analysis ; Linear Models ; Milk - cytology ; Milk - standards ; Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams ; Propidium ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sheep ; sheep milk ; somatic cell count ; Staining and Labeling ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Time Factors ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2008-08, Vol.91 (8), p.3114-3118</ispartof><rights>2008 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Dairy Science Association Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030208711068$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20540882$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18650287$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linage, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carriedo, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente, L.F.</creatorcontrib><title>Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A total of 101 composite ovine milk samples (50 from Assaf ewes and 51 from Churra ewes), ranging between 50×103 and 2,200×103 cells/mL, were divided into 10 aliquots/milk to be analyzed by DCC. Four undiluted aliquots and 4 aliquots diluted 1:1 in PBS were analyzed by using soak times of 0, 1, 2, and 3 min/aliquot, and the other 2 aliquots were diluted 1:1 in propidium iodide or ethidium bromide staining solutions and analyzed by DCC. Milk samples were also analyzed by the Fossomatic method, as a reference. All analyses were carried out in duplicate. Undiluted milk samples with soak times ≥1min showed large coefficients of regression (b=0.96 to 0.98) and correlation (r>0.99) when compared with the Fossomatic method. In these samples, DCC gave repeatability standard deviations (sr=35 to 51×103 cells/mL) lower than other DCC analytical conditions (sr=49 to 74×103 cells/mL), and their log SCC means (5.51 to 5.52) were close to the reference value (5.56). The log SCC means corresponding to samples diluted 1:1 in staining solutions (5.55) did not differ from the reference value; however, these aliquots had lower regression coefficients (b: 0.92 to 0.93). Samples diluted 1:1 in PBS and undiluted samples with a 0-min soak time showed a global accuracy similar to or lower than undiluted samples with soak times ≥1min. Breed did not seem to affect the results. We concluded that undiluted raw milk with a soak time ≥1min and analyzed by DCC shows suitable overall accuracy in ovine milk compared with the reference method and can be considered as the best option for on-farm use from an operational point of view.</description><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Cell Count - instrumentation</subject><subject>Cell Count - veterinary</subject><subject>DeLaval cell counter</subject><subject>Ethidium</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Least-Squares Analysis</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Milk - cytology</subject><subject>Milk - standards</subject><subject>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</subject><subject>Propidium</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>sheep milk</subject><subject>somatic cell count</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEotvCkSuykOCW4o98ONyqtHxIi3rY9mw59pj1NrEXO1nU38UfrMMGipA42eN55p0Zv1n2iuBzRir-fqfjOcWY5wTT6km2IiUtc0Ya_jRbYUxpjhmmJ9lpjLsUEorL59kJ4VWJKa9X2c_N1ocRtX4YJmeVHK13H9DVQfbTrzvyBo1bQNcHCLLv0YVSU5Dq_vf7JaxlglELKdn6yY0QkPEBbfyQBNRfCWRdkrEO0Ffb36UmxoAaZ6GNl3foxg4wI5e2n0bQSDqNbp1eorkEbeSw7yG-yJ4Z2Ud4uZxn2e3Hq5v2c76-_vSlvVjnqqiqMVc156w2XNNSVYwUVGvCOsq4YVqbpgZc1kAMrSkDjpuOm6ppOlMQhuuulB07y94ddffBf58gjmKwUaV9pAM_RVE1rKhpUyXwzT_gzk_BpdkEaUpOKcdFgvIjpIKPMYAR-2AHGe4FwWK2UiQrxWylmK1M_OtFdOoG0I_04l0C3i6AjEr2JkinbPzDJacLzDl9XGNrv21_2AAiDsnKJEvmlg0RPPUn84T1EYT0qQcLQURlwSnQqUiNQnv7n1kfAMMUxoM</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Gonzalo, C.</creator><creator>Linage, B.</creator><creator>Carriedo, J.A.</creator><creator>De La Fuente, L.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Am Dairy Sci Assoc</general><general>American Dairy Science Association</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples</title><author>Gonzalo, C. ; Linage, B. ; Carriedo, J.A. ; De La Fuente, L.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Cell Count - instrumentation</topic><topic>Cell Count - veterinary</topic><topic>DeLaval cell counter</topic><topic>Ethidium</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Least-Squares Analysis</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Milk - cytology</topic><topic>Milk - standards</topic><topic>Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams</topic><topic>Propidium</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>sheep milk</topic><topic>somatic cell count</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzalo, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linage, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carriedo, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Fuente, L.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzalo, C.</au><au>Linage, B.</au><au>Carriedo, J.A.</au><au>De La Fuente, L.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>91</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3114</spage><epage>3118</epage><pages>3114-3118</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><coden>JDSCAE</coden><abstract>This study evaluated the performance of the DeLaval cell counter (DCC) when analyzing ovine milk with different soak times (defined as the permanence time of samples within the DCC cassette before starting the DCC counting procedure) in diluted and undiluted milk samples in 2 dairy sheep breeds. A total of 101 composite ovine milk samples (50 from Assaf ewes and 51 from Churra ewes), ranging between 50×103 and 2,200×103 cells/mL, were divided into 10 aliquots/milk to be analyzed by DCC. Four undiluted aliquots and 4 aliquots diluted 1:1 in PBS were analyzed by using soak times of 0, 1, 2, and 3 min/aliquot, and the other 2 aliquots were diluted 1:1 in propidium iodide or ethidium bromide staining solutions and analyzed by DCC. Milk samples were also analyzed by the Fossomatic method, as a reference. All analyses were carried out in duplicate. Undiluted milk samples with soak times ≥1min showed large coefficients of regression (b=0.96 to 0.98) and correlation (r>0.99) when compared with the Fossomatic method. In these samples, DCC gave repeatability standard deviations (sr=35 to 51×103 cells/mL) lower than other DCC analytical conditions (sr=49 to 74×103 cells/mL), and their log SCC means (5.51 to 5.52) were close to the reference value (5.56). The log SCC means corresponding to samples diluted 1:1 in staining solutions (5.55) did not differ from the reference value; however, these aliquots had lower regression coefficients (b: 0.92 to 0.93). Samples diluted 1:1 in PBS and undiluted samples with a 0-min soak time showed a global accuracy similar to or lower than undiluted samples with soak times ≥1min. Breed did not seem to affect the results. We concluded that undiluted raw milk with a soak time ≥1min and analyzed by DCC shows suitable overall accuracy in ovine milk compared with the reference method and can be considered as the best option for on-farm use from an operational point of view.</abstract><cop>Savoy, IL</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18650287</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2008-1026</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0302 |
ispartof | Journal of dairy science, 2008-08, Vol.91 (8), p.3114-3118 |
issn | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_69347296 |
source | ScienceDirect; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | accuracy Animal productions Animals Biological and medical sciences Breeding Cell Count - instrumentation Cell Count - veterinary DeLaval cell counter Ethidium Food industries Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Least-Squares Analysis Linear Models Milk - cytology Milk - standards Milk and cheese industries. Ice creams Propidium Reproducibility of Results Sheep sheep milk somatic cell count Staining and Labeling Terrestrial animal productions Time Factors Vertebrates |
title | Short Communication: Evaluation of the Overall Accuracy of the DeLaval Cell Counter for Somatic Cell Count in Ovine Milk: Effect of Soak Time in Diluted and Undiluted Milk Samples |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T02%3A07%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Short%20Communication:%20Evaluation%20of%20the%20Overall%20Accuracy%20of%20the%20DeLaval%20Cell%20Counter%20for%20Somatic%20Cell%20Count%20in%20Ovine%20Milk:%20Effect%20of%20Soak%20Time%20in%20Diluted%20and%20Undiluted%20Milk%20Samples&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Gonzalo,%20C.&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=91&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3114&rft.epage=3118&rft.pages=3114-3118&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft.coden=JDSCAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2008-1026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1553314611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-c78837f8d25c63142dd13b238f3ddf97e057e1f2723e809b8f699bf41307b5ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195822804&rft_id=info:pmid/18650287&rfr_iscdi=true |